1. Describe the possible factors that provoked Martin Guerre to leave his wife.
What factor is the most important?
There are quite a few possible factors that proved Martin Guerre to leave his wife which include the seeking of adventure by a young man wanting more than his life in Artigat could provide. Martin Guerre was a teenage when he was married to his also young bride that was forced upon them; forced marriage was common for the time for alliances and power moves to become a stronger family. Then impotence strikes the young couple for 8 years (Davis 1983, 16 & 20). During the marriage there were growing tensions within the family on both sides of the marriage. The tensions apexes when Martin Guerre was accused of stealing grain from
…show more content…
What was the verdict and penalty of the Parlement of Toulouse against Arnaud du Tilh? What were the possible penalties?
The Parlement of Toulouse gave Arnaund du Tilh the verdict of guilty and sentenced him to die. The initial idea of punishment was beheading. Unfortunately, that death sentenced for Arnaud was only replaced with death by hanging without torture (Davis 1983, 89). Another penalty to Arnauds crimes was a formal apology to the Artigat (Davis 1983, 91). Public penalties of death throughout history have often been the town’s entertainment, which drew crowds from the surrounding areas to watch.
5. Describe the relationship between the real Martin Guerre and Bertrande after the
…show more content…
The rejoined couple conceived more children, which there is the Guerre name still in Artigat (Davis 1983, 124). They were dependent on each other in life. Bertrande had the security of a husband and Martin had a wife to care for him in his crippled state (Davis 1983, 124). Davis assumes that the story slowly declined in popularity within Artigat. Yet, this is small town/ city France which with all likelihood produced an Urban legend that dogged Martin and Bertrande on constant reminder and assumedly the following generations that claimed the Martin
The judges sent investigators to Spain to check Pansette’s testimony about his activities there. The Parliament made the crippled man prove that he was Martin Guerre. Martin’s sisters recognized him as their brother, while Bertrande conceded he was her true husband. Pansette was sentenced to death by hanging for his crimes. Bertrande was spared based on her gender.
The story of Bernhardt “Bernie” Tiede is well known for its realistic and entertaining motion picture. This adaptation depicts the impression of a warm, caring man who the community wouldn’t believe partook in the murder of an elderly woman. It is not the question if Bernie committed the act, rather than “did he plan it?” I believe this crime was not premeditated, but was done in the “heat of the moment”.
Such as characters ; Dr.Manette, Charles Darnay, and Sydney Carton. The first Character, Dr.Manette, is a physician and a former prisoner of the Bastille. He was brought to his “death” when he was put in prison for 18 years.
One after another victim-to-victim fell to the unjust and unlawful acts of the justice system of the time without any help from the surrounding society. Justine was the first to fall because of how no one stood up for her in the society that lived all around her therefore she took the fall for everything. Second to feel the heat was Mr. De Lacy who consequently dragged the whole family down the government did not want Mr. De Lacy poking around anymore so they framed him. No one tried to appeal the trial or even tried to find evidence to help his case. Finally Victor, the one who sat there and did not speak up for Justine, felt the cold shoulder from society too when he was accused of murder.
Jurgis Rudkus, the main character in The Jungle by Upton Sinclair, has a very rough journey when he moves to America from Lithuania. He faces many hardships and they're difficult for anyone to endure. Throughout the novel Jurgis is put through the justice/prison system multiple times, and each time he experienced something new, whether it be the unjust treatment he received, the food he was served, or even the condition of his cell and daily life there. The novel portrayed the justice system as an unfair one. They treat immigrants and the poor unfairly.
Thrilling, thought-provoking, and invigorating, murder mysteries consist of detectives who are given the facts of the case and witness statements. With much backtracking, they connect what they discover to solve the murder. One murder mystery that generates these above feelings is the murder of Augustus Millbrae (“The Art of Murder”). Six subjects admitted to Millbrae’s murder; however, one artist stood out the most, Filippo Morte.
These accounts caused other people to be accused of such a event, which led to the higher courts taking action on the evidence and prosecutions. Several important figures were taken of their lives by the rope. Throughout this play a certain value was promptly expressed by many characters. A value is something of worth to a person, and it is by one’s judgment
Hugh Richardson was the presiding magistrate at Louis Riel’s trial. The government had appointed him out of satisfaction. What was unjust about appointing him was his lack of independence and the fact that he was part of the Orange Order Protestants of which were the individuals who wanted to see Riel dead. Richardson did not speak French and lacked experience in trials such as Riel’s. When it came time to for him to make his judgement, it was “less than a dozen words” and he had given no reasons whatsoever as to why he made the ruling he did.
It was a sunny day in Red Hook Brooklyn. The suns rays were shining over the docks as the sounds of ships entering and exiting the port could be heard throughout the neighborhood. The serenity of the day was shattered when a cry was heard throughout the neighborhood; “Eddie Carbone!” The eerie silence following this shout is broken by the cries of Catherine and Beatrice Carbone. This day was the day that Mr. Eddie Carbone was slaughtered in the street.
Moral Ambiguity and History within The Assault Harry Mulisch’s The Assault is a self-proclaimed “story of an incident” (3) wherein “the rest [of the events are] a postscript” (55). The incident in question is the murder of Anton Steenwijk’s parents, and the postscript refers to the future, where Anton uncovers details relating to the incident. Despite Mulisch’s definitive distinction between events, however, the incident itself is convoluted and its details shift over the span of the work. Through the development of major and supporting characters, Mulisch brings forth a diverse range of perspectives and reconstructs the history of the incident, thereby exploring the motif of moral ambiguity within The Assault.
The Worst Crime: Matt’s or Richard’s “Killings”, written by Andre Dubus, illustrates how the death of a loved one may lead to dire consequences for all the parties included. Matt Fowler’s son, Frank, was murdered in cold blood by a jealous soon-to-be ex-husband, Richard Strout. When the death of Frank sunk into the lives of the Fowler’s, Matt believed he had to retaliate in some sort of fashion. The sort of fashion he chose was to seek revenge and kill Richard for his wrongdoings, which he did. Some people believe that the murder committed by Richard Strout can be considered more serious because of his act of passion and his lackadaisical style of living without worrying about his future.
The two wants to be married and live happily forever. However, right after the marriage everything gave gone south when Tybalt and Romeo fight which Romeo slain Tybalt. This led to the banishment of Romeo and the marriage plan of Juliet and Paris. Friar Laurence sets
Andre Dubus, short stories contain a common theme of revenge, morality, and justice. In “Killings” published in 1979, Andre displays the theme of revenge and justice through the development of characters, the title of the story, and the thrill of the suspense. Dubus neglects to take sides with the characters in the “Killings”, which leaves it upon the readers to make assumption whether the killings were justifiable. Dubus has a very unique style of writing, the main characters in “Killings” were given a choice that could’ve led them to a completely different outcome. Dubus keeps the readers on their toes because the opposite usually ends up happening.
The Death Penalty, loss of life due to previous crimes and actions, is believed by some to be extremely costly, inhumane, and cruel unlike some others whom believe it is just, right, and provides closure. The Death Penalty is not a quick and easy process. Most who get sentenced to deaths row wait years for their ultimate punishment of death. Some believe that it is not right to punish and kill a human for actions they have done because, they believe that the inmate should have another chance. Then others believe that it is right to punish someone for their actions especially if their actions involve killing another or multiple humans.
H. Auden, in an essay The Guilty Vicarage, describes how the detective novels depict not just one guilty criminal, but, by putting the of suspicion on each and every member of the closed society, marks each and every member as such. The detective, by identifying the criminal and purging them from the society absolves the guilt of the entire society. According to Auden, the detective absolves not just the suspects of their guilt, but provides the same absolution/salvation to the readers of detective fiction also. Auden thus, points out some of the more unwitting functions of detective fiction, that is, to work as a literary embodiment of a mechanism which assumes everybody to be guilty and thereby the need of subjecting all to confession. In The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, once the confessions from all major characters is extracted, the most significant of all confessions still remains -- that of the murderer.