This appeal arises from an order declining to ratify an auditor’s account following a foreclosure sale, and the denial of a motion filed by appellants, Laura H.G. O’Sullivan, et al. (The “Substitute Trustees”) to reconsider. Appellee, Jacquelyn L. McNair (“McNair”) has not responded to the Substitute Trustees’ appeal. On appeal, the Substitute Trustees presents one issue for our review. We rephrase the Substitute Trustees’ question as follows: Whether the circuit court erred refusing to ratify the foreclosure sale when it found that the attorney’s fees sought by the Substitute Trustees to be unreasonable. For the reasons set forth below, we shall affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 22, 2006, McNair purchased real property located at 2000 Wintergreen Place, Posedale, Maryland 21237 (“the property”). McNair purchased the property in exchange for a note for $195,455.00 which was secured by a deed of trust on the property.
…show more content…
. .” Subsequently, McNair fell into default and a foreclosure sale was held on June 21, 2013. The property was sold for $192.808.33, and McNair was credited an additional $66.24 for property taxes paid on the property. At the time of the foreclosure sale, McNair’s outstanding obligation on the note was $192,609.80. Pursuant to paragraph 18 of the deed of trust, the auditor’s account awarded a trustees’ commission in the amount of $9,640.42, and attorneys’ fees in the amount of
The trial court determined that the transfer constituted a fraudulent conveyance. 3. Michael Sark was unable to pay his creditors including Quality leasing. Michael and Paula filled a bankruptcy but their case was dismissed in October 2008. In December sarks took title to their resident, a property worth $203,500 to their son for $1.
The Board of Directors, of the Pinion Ridge Homeowners Association. having duly noticed and convened a meeting of the board pursuant to Elizabeth Tuttle’s rental house Whereas circumstances have arisen that indicate to the board that Elizabeth Tuttle did not apply for any building permits through San Miguel county or the state of New Mexico to remodel a shop .An apartment was built in its place .whereas having duly deliberated on and investigated the covenants of association forbids a second building to be built on a single duelling. The board adopts the following resolution to be inserted in the minutes of the meeting It is hereby resolved owner shall not rent or lease the apartment building .Elizabeth Tuttle must disconnect the main water
The Howes at 55385 CR 35 stressed the importance of buying up any property to prevent others from building around us. Now that the Howes are selling, their is no respect for the the declarations of restrictions or the respect of the neighboring properties. Jeffery and Tamela Osborn at 55401 CR 35, Middlebury, IN have tried to purchase the said property parcel D - 3acres on the north of our property for several years and most recent before the Howes listed their home and a portion of their property for sale so we could maintain and mow parcel D. The Howes at 55385 CR 35 requesting the variance never accepted our request to purchase or even told us what they wanted for the property.
The regulation states, an employee must be restored to a position that is geographically proximate to their previous position. Furthermore, it is an interference of an employee’s right, to which he or she is entitled under FMLA, by failing to restore him or her to an equivalent position upon return to work. 29 C.F.R. § 825.215. In the case of McFadden v. Seagoville State Bank, the employee’s previous job before taking FMLA leave required a seven mile commute one way, which takes ten minutes to drive.
M. “Motorized vehicles” to include all personal, joint, partnership, business interest; automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, aircraft, and all forms of watercraft rergistered in the United States and foreign. N. “Court Ordered Judgement”, “Aboved Styled Case”, shall mean a June 24, 2010, Broward County 17Th Judicial Circuit Court Order Judgment, recorded in Broward County Florida as; SEAN THOMAS v. LAKE HART DEVELOPER, LLC; et al, case number: 07-14768 (25). The Debtors place of
According to Find A Case, the Thomson v. Voldahl case is a case in which, “Plaintiff taxpayers seek judgment in favor of Winnebago County for special assessment funds paid by the county to defendants as partial payment on void contracts. Plaintiffs seek eventual repayment of such funds to them as the special assessment taxpayers. Trial court dismissed plaintiffs ' petition. We reverse and remand.” (FindACase, n.d.).
The petitioner’s original bond was revoked after evidence that he was intimidating the witness and after the petitioner screamed and shouted racial slurs at the magistrate judge as well as spit on his face. This behavior furthered supported that Charles Sell was suffering from a delusional disorder. The district court concluded that the decision to involuntarily medicate Charles Sell to restore his health and competence is constitutional. The courts also concluded that the drugs administered must not have any negative effects. They also stated that drugs used were medically appropriate for Charles Sell and it gave him the right to due process and protected his fifth and sixth amendment right to a fair trial.
Introduction Blake Goodwin is the CEO of Goodwin Wealth Management. He was deciding to hire a consultant to make an assessment of his situation. Three large companies had expressed interest to acquire Goodwin Wealth Management. In the fall 2007, Ice Financial Income Fund, First Canadian Band, and Brawn Financial Corporation were the potential suitors and they had made offers to acquire the company. Blake Goodwin had to decide whether to sell the company and if he sold it, which buyer was the best one.
During the year 1993, Maurice Turner, a police officer in Cobb County, Georgia, listed Julia Lynn Womack as the inheritor on his life insurance policies and retirement account. The two got married three months later and not even six months later, she started an affair with Randy Thompson. Supposdly she led him to believe that she was divorced. In March of 1995, Mr. Turner began to experience flu-like symptoms and as a result he made his way to the emergency room where he would be treated then sent home.
COMES NOW R. Mark Armstrong, pro se (“Plaintiff”), and hereby files a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. The causes of action include but are not limited to: 1) Qua Tam (Claims A, B and C) Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) (1972) [33 U.S.C. § 1367] : Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) (1976) [42 U.S.C. § 6971] : FCA, 31 U.S.C. 3730(b)-(g) 2)Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) 18 U.S.C. §1961 et seq., 3) Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (Claim A) First Amendment as controlled by Garcetti_v._Ceballos Violations, (Claim B) Fourteenth Amendment Violations, 4) Retaliation under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), 5) Intentional infliction of emotional distress, for prima facie tort Tortuous Breach of Implied Covenant
The New Jersey Superior Court’s Chancery division granted summary judgment in favor of the
Ophelia Paquet is a woman who pushed society and the government to recognize her and her marriage by awarding her ownership of property that she lived on for 30 years with her husband. When Ophilia’s husband died without a will, she was awarded owner until her brother-in-law, John contested it. The issue that arose was the race of Ophelia, Fred and John. Fred a white man, married Ophelia, a Tillamook Indian wife. “Miscegenation law kept property within racial boundaries by invalidating marriages between white men and women of color whenever ancillary white relatives like John Paquet contested them.”
Kids ranging from 8-15 years are tried as a juvenile and to transfer the case into adult court, they would fill out an application to do so. Kids committing crimes such as armed robbery, rape, or even murder should be tried as an adult. This type of allegation will not go unseen just because he/ she is a child. Even though these criminals are children, they will not or should not be exempt from the law or juvenile justice system.
Later in the interview she reported that she had been experiencing fear and anxiety that the worst could happen to her. Ms. NS elaborated on the response that there would be always a possibility that unthinkable events could happen, especially after she had already encounter events like losing her home, getting kicked out from her Godmother’s house, and losing her grandmother and friend around the same time. Precipitating Factors and History of the Problem Ms. NS reported that she and her family lost her grandmother around two years ago. Upon the loss of her grandmother, Ms. NS stated that the house she had lived in as long as she could remember had to be sold.
The plaintiff is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However, the issue should have been decided by the jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual. The issue is whether the district court correctly granted summary judgment in the favor of the defendant because the shaker table rotation rule at issue was an essential function of the employee’s job.