Minority communities have seen a fall in civic participation since the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Many individuals have reasons why they have not participated in recent elections, and many political scientists are discovering potential institutional factors that are limiting minority participation. Demographics like age, income, and education; US citizenship; political learning; and a decline in social networks affect civic participation at the civic level and things like voting complexity, technology failures, and a need for poll worker training, voting early and reduction of polling places are institutional barriers for minorities. However, minority communities and political parties seeking their votes do have options and strategies …show more content…
Individual factors that have led to a decrease in minority civic participation are a piece in understanding why minority civic participation has decreased since the Voting Rights Act passed in 1965. Demographics show that younger people participate less in civic life, and the minority community has a higher share of younger people than whites. People with less education participate less, and minority communities have a higher share of non-college graduate compared to whites. And finally, people with lower incomes participate less, and minority communities have a higher share of people with lower incomes. (Week 6 Lecture 1). All these factors indirectly show that minority communities are participating less …show more content…
All these factors are handled by the state or a smaller organization for the state. Where individual factors are more personal and self-determining, these institutional factors are set by somebody else and are affecting the minority communities. This includes state measures that effectively make voting more complex or time-constraining. States have the power to make voting registration longer and harder and cut the registration windows so that less people end up registering and inevitably voting (Week 6 Lecture 1). As technology gets more advanced, there are attempts to incorporate it into voting procedures in order to cut costs, which is reasonable. However, most poll workers are older and are not as familiar with new technology as younger people, so polling places need to hire younger poll workers which is more difficult (Week 6 Lecture 1). States can also cut the cost of election by encouraging voting early and cutting the number of polling places and that has been implemented in the past, but recently some states are discouraging early voting and not replacing the polling places, effectively making voting harder for everyone (Week 6 Lecture 1). Since minority communities are less likely to be educated in the civic life, they would be less motivated to travel
At just about the same time, the percentage increase of eligible voters in United States presidential elections almost tripled, rising from 26.9 to 80.2 percent (Document A). These two statistics were the result of the changes in voting laws that removed restrictions upon eligible voters. It also reflected a citizenship that had begun to realize they had control and a stake in their
We see multiple successes of voting equality attempted through amendments, however, the Supreme Court’s decision on Shelby County v. Holder has pushed back years and years of effort for voting rights. Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling was in Shelby County’s favor, stating that the Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional along with Section 5. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr, who wrote the majority’s opinion, said that the power to regulate election was reserved to the states, not the federal government. As a result to the court’s decision, the federal government can no longer determine which voting law discriminates and can be passed. After the case, many states had freely passed new voting laws; the most common voting law states passed
With compulsory voting many countries become successful. Germany,Peru, Australia and many more countries have been required to vote since the late 1800’s to the late 1900’s (Doc A). In Brazil those who don 't vote have to pay a fine, causing many to not miss their voting slot time
Many of the issues that affect every day Americans such as education and economic growth are equally important in these communities. However, some issues like immigration and the War on Drugs hold a higher priority and have been at the forefront of Latino civic engagement for decades. Despite this truth, their resolution has been delayed endlessly as attention is dedicated elsewhere. An increase in civic engagement and political representation signifies increased attention to these important issues, allowing Latino leaders to help set the agenda and ensure these various issues are on course to their
However, there are more voter participations, but women, Native Americans, and African Americans cannot
After the Civil War in 1865, Republicans in Congress introduced a series of Constitutional Amendments to secure civil and political rights for African Americans. The right that gave black men the privilege to vote provoked the greatest controversy, especially in the North. In 1867, Congress passed the law and African American men began voting in the South, but in the North, they kept denying them this basic right (“African Americans,” 2016). Republicans feared that they would eventually lose control of Congress on the Democrats and thought that their only solution was to include the black men votes. Republicans assumed that all African American votes would go to all the Republicans in the North, as they did in the South and by increasing the
For the first time in our nation’s short history, citizen’s voices were beginning to have more and more of an influence on our governing body. However, during this era, political freedoms were also being restricted. Despite the Fifteenth Amendment granting the right to vote to all male citizens, some—specifically those who were black or poor—were discouraged or even barred from voting due to “…literacy tests and residency and registration requirements” (Foner 701). Despite gaining political freedoms during the Progressive era, many were still restricted from doing so. Much like political freedoms, there were also expansions and restrictions of economic freedoms during the Progressive Era as well.
In my essay I will provide three reasons why I do not believe Texas is operating within a democracy-a political system where the many rule. According to Author Robert Dahl, a democracy should provide opportunities for effective participation, equality in voting and inclusion of adults. There are socioeconomic factors- such ethnicity, education and income which are mentioned by author of our textbook, that impact voter participation. To begin, let’s look at the role a person ethnicity plays in a democracy. Next, examine the level of education and how it correlates to voting.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a large portion of Americans were restricted from civil and political rights. In American government in Black and White (Second ed.), Paula D. McClain and Steven C. Tauber and Vanna Gonzales’s power point slides, the politics of race and ethnicity is described by explaining the history of discrimination and civil rights progress for selective groups. Civil rights were retracted from African Americans and Asian Americans due to group designation, forms of inequality, and segregation. These restrictions were combatted by reforms such as the Thirteenth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fifteenth amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, etc. Although civil and political
To accomplish social equality and justice has been a long controversial issue in U.S. history. Voting Rights Act of 1965 should be understood as a tremendous accomplishment today because it not only represent a symbol of the triumph of fighting social injustice, but also open the first gate for African American and minority to strive for more political power in order to create a “great society.”
This unfamiliarity and thought of the process being confusing deters the younger people from registering to vote in the first place. By removing this process, voters can just show up to cast their votes and move on with their day without worrying about this potentially confusing process. These three methods combined could increase the voter turnout for each
The increasing numbers of Latino youth who obtain college degrees are become active in politics, with the biggest trend of Latino population is youth and growth we can only hope for even more support in politics. “For the first time ever, Latinos accounted for one in ten votes cast nationwide in the presidential election, and Obama recorded the highest ever vote total for any presidential candidate among Latinos, at 75%” (Barreto and Segura 145). The Latino vote is becoming a crucial element to politics because of their size in population. . “While turnout declined nationally from 2008 to 2012 (by 2%), among Latinos there was a 28% increase in votes cast in 2012 (from 9.7 million to 12.5 million) and Obama further increased his vote share among Latinos in 2012 compared to 2008” (Barreto and Segura 145). In recent polls
“ While compulsion of any kind is a restriction, so is the compulsion to drive only on the right side of the road.” ( “Is It Time To Consider Mandatory Voting Laws? Worsening Voting Statistics Make a Strong Case.” by John W. Dean.) One way voter turnout can increase is by compulsory (required) voting.
It is clear that American voters tend to avoid local elections and off-year elections. Run-off elections are also likely to register lower voter turnout as compared to first-round elections. The larger the gap between first round elections and run-off elections, the higher the decline in voter turnout. Moreover, there are lower percentages of young people voting as compared to the older population. This is an important point to note since it highlights that young people do not have information guiding them on the importance of voting.
The right to vote was a privilege given to only a particular group of people in the past. The right to participate in the judicial system to some is an honor. This process allows people to voice and chose who they want in office or what issue they want to support. Voter Id laws are incorporated into our society as a form of control in order to keep people silent. Voter id laws are under controversy because the law is viewed as being discriminatory against minorities.