Imagine our world without the start or end of 80’s trends. Both the start and end of “80’s Fashion” was started by mob mentality. According to an article on Brains.org, “Mob or Herd mentality refers to the behavioral tendency of people (or other social animals) to act in unison with the group of which they are a part,” (What is Mob…). 80’s fashion was started by a small group of people which much of the United States later followed. Mob mentality occurs all over the country and is a big part of the world’s culture, as it is also highly focused on in literary works. Mob Mentality was used in both A Gathering of Old Men by Earnest Gaines and Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, and they also have deeper connections within each other. Earnest …show more content…
When Cassius got Brutus to conspire against Caesar it led to others joining this group of conspirators. Caesar did not like Cassius, so Cassius wanted to have him assassinated. The only way Cassius could do that was if he had a group of people to help him. Cassius convinced Brutus, Caesar’s most trusted friend, and a group of senators that they were going to assassinate Caesar for the good of Rome. Rome was not to be ruled by one single leader, but as Caesar got more powerful he eventually became the dictator of Rome. Many people knew that this was not right, but did not speak out about it. Brutus’ ancestors were the reason Rome was turned into a republic, so Brutus cared dearly about his country. Brutus and Caesar were actually very close friends, and when others found out that Brutus was in on the assassination it convinced them to help, as well. The mob mentality in Julius Caesar was formed by Cassius when he got Brutus to side with him. The mob’s mentality was so strong that Brutus lied to his wife when she asked if he was keeping secrets from her. Portia, Burtus’ wife was becoming suspicious when she noticed him acting differently lately. One night Portia confronted her husband, and asked him why he had been acting so strangely. Brutus replied, “I am not well in health and that is all,” (1028). As Brutus said this he lied right to his wife’s face. Brutus lying to his …show more content…
There are more connections in the two works than just the author using mob mentality. The way the author writes about the character that benefits from the group. In Earnest Gaines’ novel, A Gathering of Old Men, a crowd of old men bonded together to protect each other in a time of crisis. In William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, a group of conspirators came together to assassinate Caesar for the greater good of Rome. In both of these works mob mentality is used to benefit one single person. In A Gathering of Old Men, the mob protects the murderer of Beau Bauton. The actual murderer of Beau Bauton was Charlie, and he was the only one who benefited from the group of old men. Similar to how Charlie benefited from the mob in A Gathering of Old Men, Cassius benefited from the mob in Julius Caesar. Cassius hated Caesar, so he wanted him dead. Cassius convinced a group of senators that they were going to kill Caesar for the greater good of Rome. When the group assassinated Caesar Cassius had gotten what he wanted all along. In addition to the connections that only one person was benefited in each writing but there are also connections in the way each author approached the mob mentality theme. Gaines’ mob was to protect one single person, but it actually was letting a murderer run loose. Shakespeare’s mob was to help Rome but was just really killing someone over a grudge. In both pieces
Julius Caesar was a powerful general and politician of Rome. He had many friends and many enemies as well. One of his closest friends goes by the name of Marc Antony who was not only the lover of Cleopatra, but another Roman general that worked under Caesar. As history states, Brutus, a senator of Rome, was frightened that Caesar would become too powerful and become King of Rome. In order to prevent this from happening, 60 conspirators, all led by Brutus, stabbed Caesar to death.
In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the character Cassius wishes to convince Brutus to join him in conspiring against Caesar because he and his co-conspirators believe Caesar is unfit to rule Rome. In this passage, Cassius persuades Brutus through his pathos, ethos, and logos. Cassius exploits Brutus’s pathos in that he compliments Brutus to inflate his ego, as shown when Cassius says Brutus has “hidden worthiness” (1,2,57) and his worthiness earns him “many of the best respect in Rome” (1,2,59). Cassius utilizes these compliments in order to make Brutus see himself as a chosen one to aid Cassius in removing Caesar from the throne. Moreover, Cassius attempts to sway Brutus through his pathos by capitalizing Brutus’s fear for the future of Rome,
In recent years, we have had a series of events that have sparked outrage across our world. This outrage sometimes leads to an issue I have in contemporary culture: mob mentality. “Herd mentality”, or more commonly known as “mob mentality” refers to how people lose their self-awareness and moral code when they are with a group of people. Mob mentality usually drives people to do things they wouldn’t normally do, such as jumping someone, Whether it be a large amount of people online harassing an artist or a movement that has been tainted by the aggressive nature of some, herd/mob mentality has become a more prevalent and pressing issue in the 21st century.
Brutus and the senators had made a plan to kill Caesar. Even though Caesar was his friend, Brutus joins the conspiracyagainst Caesar’s life because he feels that Caesar’s death is better for Rome. Brutus did not want to allow Caesar to rise to power and turn his back onto the people of Rome. Brutus felt like Caesar was being a dictator. “Which, hatched, would as his kind grow mischievous, And kill him in a shell” (2,1,33-34) Similar to how Cady, Janice and Damian made a plan to destroy Regina.
Thus demonstrating how mob mentality can impact an individual and ultimately drive the action of the play. This shows us how one person who starts
A quality all humans possess is questioning leadership. The reasons why we challenge or rebel against our leaders describe what kind of individual we are. Cassius and Brutus have different reasons for questioning Caesars power. Both characters have a common goal but exceedingly different values, thought process, and motives for killing Caesar. Cassius and Brutus are characters who have opposite values.
And while Brutus did work in part with other conspirators, which eventually led to him killing Caesar, he did it for a more morally sound reason which was that Caesar was going to cause the downfall of Rome because he was too ambitious, which is ironic because Caesar's death led to a string of unfit leaders, and civil unrest that eventually led to the downfall of the roman empire. Brutus was also focused on preventing corruption. “The name of Cassius honors this corruption,/ And chastisement doth therefore hide his head (IV.iii.15-6)... Remember March, the ides of March remember./ Did not great Julius bleed for justice' sake” (IV.iii.18-9).
Power in Lord of The Flies and Julius Caesar Ralph and Brutus have power over others and use that power for the greater good. In Julius Caesar and Lord of The Flies, power is used differently than others. Ralph and Brutus use their power for good. On the other hand, people like Jack and Cassius use their power irresponsibly. The wrong people were hurt under their power and not for a good reason.
Brutus was one, if not the only one, who helped kill Julius Caesar for reasons that were not selfish. Cassius tells Brutus that Julius was a greedy man that needed to be killed for the good of Rome. Brutus believes Cassius and gets the last blow at Julius which is the stab that ended Julius’ life. Later when Brutus finds out the truth he is angry at Cassius for lying and leading him to kill his good friend.
In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the person most responsible for the death of Julius Caesar is Cassius, he started the conspiracy and developed the plan of how to manipulate and convince Brutus to kill Caesar and lead Rome. While it may look like Brutus was the one responsible for his death, it was Cassius who made him think that he needed to that by slipping fake letters into his room. Cassius began the rebellion against Caesar, and then developed a plan to make Brutus think he need to kill Caesar and become the leader, and finally as well as the other conspirators, Cassius contributed to stabbing Caesar. TS 1: in the beginning of the story we are introduced to the conspirators, who are lead by Cassius and we discover that they are determined to destroy Caesar. In the beginning of the play Cassius is trying to convince Brutus that there is nothing special about Caesar, he is “Like a Colossus, and [they] petty men Walk under his huge legs”(I, II, 137).
Cassius saves the life of Caesar, sees him beg for water, and witnesses his epileptic seizure. From these weaknesses, Cassius finds himself to be just as worthy of the crown as is Caesar. His reasons are emotionally tied to getting rid of Caesar, Brutus chooses to become a conspirator for the good of Rome. He does not know how Caesar will use his power.
Lucius Junius Brutus one of Brutus’ ancestor that turned Rome into a republic. Brutus loves caesar but doesn't want him to become king. Brutus doesn't have a personal reason to kill Caesar but for the good of Rome he has to. The country of rome would fall to Caesar if he became king because he is corrupt.
He helped plan it and he was one of the people who went through with killing Caesar. Second, it was important to Cassius to protect the Republic. Along with many other people, he didn't want Rome to become a dictatorship. Third, Cassius persuades Casca, Decius, Metellus, Brutus, and Trebonius to help him murder Caesar. He must have been very passionate about Caesar dying because it would probably take a lot of convincing to get five other people to help
(III, I, 90-91). This is Brutus trying to comfort the people and get them to listen to what they had to say about murdering him. The conspirators feared tyranny and they were willing to do anything to be free of it. But, they wouldn’t know how the people would react so they were giving them a reason to a
Brutus is without a doubt the most noble character in this play. Nonetheless, his impeccable sense of morality also blindfolds him to other people’s sordid motives and makes him easy to be manipulated. Indeed, Brutus is easily manipulated by Cassius in Act 1, Scene 2. In hope to convince Brutus to join the conspirators, Cassius says “Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings” (1.2.150-152). As a result, Brutus starts to believes that it is his job to murder Caesar, as he says in Act 2, Scene 1: “It must be by his death: and for my part, I know no personal cause to spurn at him, but for the general” (2.1.14-16).