Napoleon Dynamite is dumb and is a waste of time movie, that stereotypes high school nerds. Napoleon Dynamite takes place in the small, rural town of Preston, Idaho. It tells the story of a young teenager, Napoleon, played by Jon Heder, who is an awkward, unpopular geek who wants to fit in. Napoleon lives with his grandmother and his brother, Kip. When his grandmother gets injured and spends time in a hospital, his uncle Rico comes to look after them. Napoleon later meets Deb, and the new kid at school, Pedro. Neither of them are very popular either. They become best friends and hang out together. Napoleon and Deb help Pedro when he decides to run for student body president against Summer, who is very popular and is the captain of the cheerleading …show more content…
It has a weak plot that is hard to follow. It's about the main character’s social clumsiness and lack of communication skills as he tries to fit in. The movie has not a lot of action, showing the character's absence of emotion. If this was meant to be a comedy, it wasn’t very funny. The comedy comes from Napoleon and his friend’s awkwardness. The sense of humor is bad, It makes the audience laugh at the character and not with the character. This starts off slow and ends the same, there are no major events that happen in the movie. The movie makes no attempt to make Napoleon and his friends likable. This is a movie mocking and disrespecting nerds. Napoleon Dynamite is a waste of time. The theme of the movie unclear, and gets across no message. The directing is horrible, the scenes were cheesy and raw. The movie is hard to watch and is dull. The acting is vague and the main characters speak in a low tone that is hard to understand. The movie has no realistic conflict that gets resolved. Napoleon Dynamite pushes the stupidity and foolishness to a whole new level. Overall the movie makes no sense and is hard to enjoy. This movie is a compilation of random events that happen put into one
Even though this movie has a unique style of quirky humor that is not common in most comedic films, it still resonates with a larger audience. People who are fans of the movie
Type of source: Movie Napoleon dynamite Hess, J. (Director). (2004). Napoleon Dynamite [Motion picture on DVD]. Milano:
Rudd, Malco, and Rogen provide so many gut-busting laughs that the movie can float with them alone. Many of the film’s best moments come from the interactions of these three actors, who also are able to offer some of the most quotable lines of dialogue in the film. In addition to the supporting cast, there are also a great number of cameo appearances from other comedians and stars such as Jonah Hill, David Koechner, and Kevin Hart to name a few. The worst aspect of this film is the somewhat long running time.
Most people decide to live in the present or plan for the future in most of their lives, but many people focus on the past not only as their ages of glory but also as the only important point in their lives. A particularly poignant example of this phenomenon is the titular character uncle, Rico, from the movie Napoleon Dynamite. Rico’s saga consists of a middle-aged man who lets his teenage aspirations of being a star football player control his thinking long into adulthood. Uncle Rico provides a fantastic example of the common phenomenon of desiring and dreaming for possibilities from the past instead of actively attempting to improve his own life in the present. Uncle Rico is one of many people in the modern age who live sad existences focusing
But for those who want to know more about law, tribunal, politics, and history, this movie is highly recommended as me myself rate this film 4,5 of
Throughout the history, different medias-(Movies, tv shows, novels, songs) tackle the topic of teenage society. Jerad Hess, the director of the film Napoleon Dynamite, used many satirical device such as Exaggeration, Parody, irony, to interpret the life of a teenager in Idaho . The representation of teenage society in Napoleon Dynamite express the ups and downs of teenage life and mock/ exaggerate the life of teenegers and other contemperoty problems and situations. The director's main objective is to exaggerate and to reveal the covel changes of the country through a point of view of a teenager and the impact of those changes in their life. The immigration of Latin Americans to America and from urban areas to more rural areas are portrayed through the character Pedro and his interactions with protagonist-Napoleon Dynamite and other characters.
The uniqueness that this movie provides is that we can actually see the aggressors and how they act when talking about the events that took place and it gives the aggressors a way to show the world how they felt and how their actions were affect their
Honestly, the part that made me laugh at in the film is when Sandra Bullock and Brendan Fraser are talking and ended up fussing about the door locks. Bullock takes out her anger on a Mexican locksmith who is changing their door locks at home. Bullock said your “Amigo in there is going to sell our keys to one of his homeys.” And its a little bit funny when the mexican guy puts the keys down and calmly walking out at the end. But I just felt bad for him hearing those words and its heartbreaking to know that these things happen every second.
Overall, the film could not get any better. I love how the film takes viewers on a journey of a simple minded, small town, Alabama boy. The fact that this simple minded man did everything, that an average minded person wishes they could, is so fascinating. Another thing about the movie that was so interesting is the way they captivated every historical event from the late 1950’s to late 80’s. Everything about the film was amazing; from the way each line was said with precision, to the made up city of Alabama.
I glad to see someone on this site with a similar viewpoint on this movie. Personally for me it never displayed that "it" factor. Whoa… I’m not sure if it was the noteworthy cult film references it made to begin with, or if it was the nostalgic 90’s hip-hop culture, it emulated later on, regardless of what it was this movie flat-out blew me away in all sorts of ways that I didn’t expect. La Haine centers around a trio of friends from the French slum of banlieusards.
The movie itself was okay, but Percival decisions to lessen the character of the storyteller, Death, to leave out parts of Max’s character as a fighter and the beginning of his friendship with the man who spared his life, and to changes the circumstances in which the mayor and his wife quit using Rosa to wash their clothing, ultimately destroy the movie. Death, the narrator, describes the souls he collects and the reader hears him throughout the book, always there, but
I really enjoyed this movie, even though this is my second time seeing it, so i was able to really pick up on what is going the second time. I think the movie did a great job portraying mental health issues, they showed the impacts it has on family and friends. I think it could help people either get help or at least be aware of mental health
As the movie went on, I enjoyed it more and more. This movie did really good with entertainment and got better as it went on. This movie did have good meaning behind it as well as comedy and
Fruitvale Station is based on a true story that occurred in Oakland, California in 2009. Oscar Grant III was unarmed and lying face down on a subway platform. He was shot by a white Bay Area Rapid Transit Police Officer. This movie is about what we can imagine when we cast our gaze across the longstanding divides in this segregated American society. Oscar Grant was a real 22 - year old man.
It’s inspirational, motivational, entertaining and comical. Forrest Gump is legitimately one of the greatest movies of all time. My decision to choose this movie was not at all influenced by the opinion that this is one of the greatest movies ever created, nor was it based on the fact that the number of times I watch