ipl-logo

Nuclear Energy Persuasive Essay

1117 Words5 Pages

The world is in need of fossil fuels. Without them, we would not have cars, airplanes, and not to mention enough energy. A lot of energy is produced from them. They are a very big support. Unfortunately, they are running out. Over the past 200 years, we have consumed an unbelievable amount of them. Not only that, but they have cause never ending environmental problems like climate change. Finally when they will be gone, they will be gone forever. Thus, we need to find a new method before they are gone. The world is a mysterious place where we can find anything in it, but the most important thing to remember is not everything is perfect. Today, the most germane method found in replacement of fossil fuels is nuclear power plants. They are an …show more content…

Stating the obvious that one of the main necessities for achieving human progress is a sufficient source of energy. I am going to be taking France as an example, a country in Western Europe that plays a significant role in production of energy. It is important to state both the advantages as well as the disadvantages to make the right decision of whether countries in western Europe, specifying France should increase the production of energy or not in nuclear power stations. To start with, France gets about three quarters of electricity from nuclear power. It is also known that France originates 75% of its electricity from nuclear energy. Being above what is average. Secondly, it is the world’s largest net exporter of electricity because of the extremely low price of generation and gains 3 million a year due to this. Which is a very big advantage. In addition, In the form of fission, nuclear energy is the primary source of energy in France. It has 58 nuclear reactors (3) giving a total capacity of 63.2 Gwe, providing 416 billion kWh. France today owns a significant level of energy independence and nearly lowest cost electricity in europe. Adding to a very low level of C02 emissions per capita from electricity generation because about 90% of its electricity is nuclear or hydro. C02 emissions are …show more content…

They are having second thoughts. In addition, the costly price of nuclear power plants and nuclear inflexibilty, meaning it has slow start up and shutdown hours. Finally, as I mentioned before, nuclear waste, a very hazardous

Show More
Related

  • Examples Of Proof Why Canada Should Use More Nuclear Energy

    695 Words  | 3 Pages

    Facts, data, expert opinion: a) Low Pollution such as air pollution, water pollution - Nuclear power also has a lot fewer greenhouse emissions. It has been determined that the amount of greenhouse gases have decreased by almost half because of the prevalence in the utilization of nuclear power. Nuclear energy has the least effect on nature since it doesn’t discharge any gasses like methane and carbon dioxide b) Low Operating Costs - The cost of the uranium, which is utilized as a fuel in this process, is low. Also, even though the expense of setting up nuclear power plants is moderately high, the expense of running them is quite low. The normal life of nuclear reactor is anywhere from 40-60 years, depending on how often it is used and how it is being

    Read More

  • Coal In Centralia Research Paper

    836 Words  | 4 Pages

    As this forms we now have a fuel source that we can collect and use. What

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay-Nuclear Energy Is Australia's Future

    607 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nuclear power produces fewer carbon emissions than traditional energy sources because energy is not produced by burning molecules but splitting atoms. ‘An energy mix including nuclear power has the lowest impact on wildlife and Ecosystems’ as shown by a Conservation Biology paper. Consequently, greenhouse gas emissions have reduced by nearly half which shows the benefits and popularity of nuclear power use. Nuclear power has many environmental benefits such as small waste production, leaves no adverse effect on water, land or any habitats. By reducing fossil fuel consumption and switching to Nuclear Energy, we will sustain the environment, quality of air, improving the overall quality of

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The China Syndrome

    925 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, the cons of nuclear energy are numerous. For example, not only are there high risks of potential meltdowns, but the nuclear waste that is is created is extremely toxic. Also, the energy source of nuclear energy is Uranium, which is a scarce resource, and its supply is estimated to last only for the next 30 to 60 years. Why are people choosing to build numerous nuclear power plants all over the world when we will eventually get stuck with them and their radioactive waste in a short period of time? The film The China Syndrome is fair to the nuclear industry because it explains the potenial dangers of a nuclear power plant realistically to the

    Read More

  • How Does Fracking Affect The Environment

    1292 Words  | 6 Pages

    Our society is in constant need of energy. 40 percent of the United States energy consumption is from oil. Coal provides 23 percent and natural gas provides 22 percent of our energy. These sources and how much we get from them will soon have to change because as most of us know, our fossil fuels are limited. Once these fossil fuels are used, they cannot be replaced.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Energy

    3678 Words  | 15 Pages

    Nuclear energy may be the solution that eliminates our concern for energy production in the future, but it still remains a huge issue for the environment. Despite its wide use in many developed countries, nuclear energy poses many threats to both the

    Read More

  • Nuclear Power Argumentative Essay

    944 Words  | 4 Pages

    The potential is limitless, and it should be realized as they have low greenhouse gas emissions, are efficient, powerful, cheap and reliable. Positives outweigh the negatives, and we should keep on using nuclear energy. Firstly, nuclear power generation has low greenhouse gas emissions, which make it good for the environment. The actual fission

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power Plants

    253 Words  | 2 Pages

    They also don't have renewable energy, meaning it will eventually be consumed. Although nuclear power plants don't release as much carbon dioxide as coal power plants mining the uranium still releases a lot of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Nuclear power plants can help the environment drastically but they also come with a drastic price, they won't last forever

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power Plants

    602 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nuclear power plants have many flaws and risks, and analysing the Fukushima incident this can be noted. An earthquake caused the boiling water reactors to lose off-site electrical power, and the subsequent tsunami formed an inundation which produced an general black out, losing all control systems, safety mechanisms, etc. the first thing that happened is that they took on account the seismicity of the place, not the probability for tsunamis. With no energy they didn´t t have the energy to cool the excess heat. They tried pumping water, but there wasn´t any emergency procedure for the event.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power Plants

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    Nuclear power plants provide cheap, clean, and efficient energy and new technology might soon overcome the current drawbacks. Disasters like the ones at Chernobyl and Fukushima have long given nuclear energy an ill-deserved reputation. It produces no greenhouse gases and only trace amounts of radiation at a comparable price to coal power. However, the large initial cost and the potential for meltdowns has prevented nuclear energy from growing to supply a significant portion of the world’s electricity. Safety features on current nuclear reactors make a nuclear disaster highly unlikely, but technological advances could soon negate those risks completely.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Reactors

    675 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this day and age we seem to come across one big question where is are next source of power going to come from and for lots of countries out there seem to becoming very dependent on nuclear reactors as a main power source maybe this is because of the high energy output it has or maybe it's because of the high high availability of uranium and plutonium that is needed as the main fuel source for the reactor or it could be a combination of both of these factors. Even though the use of these nuclear reactors as a main source of energy has its benefits, the dangers these nuclear reactors pose are still very great. Accident do occur at these power plants some are small and not so bad and others can be catastrophic and accidents are not the only

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech Outline

    1286 Words  | 6 Pages

    How Technology has changed the World I. Intro a. Over time humans have destroyed the environment with pollution and now we are creating new technologies to spot polluting our planet. b. Technology is rapidly evolving and it has changed the way people live out their lives. People have become attached to technology and it is affecting the way we live both physically and mentally.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power

    607 Words  | 3 Pages

    California should not have nuclear power plants built because the stake is placed way too high. On April 26, 1986, a nuclear power plant at Chernobyl exploded, resulting in huge releases of radioactive materials. This impacted the health of countless adults and children. According to the WHO’s article, many people have acquired thyroid cancer, ARS, and cataracts from the Chernobyl incident.

    Read More

  • Nuclear Fission Essay

    1472 Words  | 6 Pages

    Even though the application of the energy source as a alternative is a affordable, establishing a plant for it would require a high initial cost and would also take up to 5-10 years, along with this, the safety measures that need to be utilized inside the plants would be very expensive ("Disadvantages of Nuclear"). To build the complex technologies that are needed and the extreme safety measures that must be built, would require a staggering amount of money, for it to be built and also for the factories to run effectively. If the safety measures aren’t taken strictly then just accidents like the two major nuclear catastrophes at Chernobyl and Fukushima will repeat itself ("Advantages & Disadvantages of Nuclear"). As nuclear reactors cannot explode like nuclear bombs, as that would require a mix of 90% highly reactive fuel vs about 4-5% of highly reactive furl for nuclear power, which can melt down if the safety measures are not properly carried out, with some highly disastrous consequences ("Advantages & Disadvantages of Nuclear"). The radiation from Chernobyl incident extended as far a Sweden and Italy resulting in thousands of cancer cases to arise in those areas.

    Read More

  • Nuclear Energy Good Or Bad

    1917 Words  | 8 Pages

    Fukushima, Chernobyl, Iran and radiation, are the words which come to our mind when we encounter the term nuclear issues. Ironically, despite its widespread use in many countries today, the use of nuclear power continues to be one of the most highly debated topics over the past 80 years since its first use. As seen from these common terms which we relate nuclear energy to, both the good and bad of nuclear power have been well portrayed to us, though the negative images of it have been illustrated to us more strongly by the media than its good. Where did this great controversy stem from, and where does it stand today? Detractors would say that they object the use of nuclear energy based on the devastation it may bring when an accident occurs.

    Read More

More about Nuclear Energy Persuasive Essay

Open Document