ipl-logo

Nullification Dbq Essay

445 Words2 Pages

In the early 1830’s, South Carolina had the idea that they could nullify the law. This meant that the states could disregard some of the federal laws. A man named John C. Calhoun Promoted the idea. In 1828, there was a tariff passed that put a tax on all imports. Calhoun and a lot of Southern states were outraged. They thought this was one way to prevent succession. Some thought that state government outranked federal government, so they could decide which laws to follow, and which to ignore. Due to this conflict, there were two sides. Only the merchants of Charleston and the small farmers of the up country supported the Union side. Many of the people supported the nullification. The South thought that they were being treated unfairly. Senator …show more content…

Webster argued that from the beginning the Revolution had been a crusade of the united colonies rather than of each separately. True sovereignty, he stated, resided in the people as a whole for whom both state and federal governments acted as agents in the people's behalf. Haynes agreed with Calhoun and thought that states could nullify laws but Webster argued that it would lead to a civil war. Andrew Jackson, a slave owner and a southerner, was president while Calhoun was vice president. Jackson supported the Union and didn’t agree with the nullification. In the end, he said that anyone that supported it would be convicted of an act of treason. He didn’t think that it was necessary to act upon this and he said you would use the military he need be. But being the president, he needed to make both sides happy. In the end, the tariffs were lowered and the people accepted it. This event was a big thing in our countries history but do I think that it could've been prevented? I do think that if the Tariff wasn’t passed, then this specific event maybe could've been avoided. But the north and south never agreed. So who's to say that another problem could of erose? I believe that both sides had different forms of living and doing things, so for them to be in agreement with one another would be close to impossible. So I don’t think an event like this could've been

Show More
Related

  • Mcculloch Vs. Maryland 1819: Enumerated Powers Of The National Government

    904 Words  | 4 Pages

    When congress was siding more with free states, Southern Leader, John C. Calhoun, created the “doctrine of nullification” which states that “a state has the constitutional right to nullify a national law” (73). This action almost lead to war when South Carolina invoked this doctrine and Andrew Jackson took military action to keep the union in tact. Although both sides were able to reach a compromise, a civil war will take place 30 years from then. Another spike in tensions was the Dred Scott decision (1857). A slave named Dred Scott argued that since his master died in a free state, and the Missouri Compromise of 1820, a federal law, made slavery in a free state illegal, he was a free man.

    Read More

  • Why Did Jackson And Calhoun Contribute To The Civil War

    849 Words  | 4 Pages

    Nullification was a controversial constitutional theory started by John C. Calhoun. He came up with the idea because he believed the tariff of 1816 was responsible for fall of South Carolinas economy. When in fact it was the exhausted farm land in the state which had caused the downfall. With his future political dreams resting on how he met this challenge in his home state he developed the theory of nullification. The theory stated that a state can suspend, within its boundaries, a federal law that was thought to be unconstitutional.

    Read More

  • Differences Between Virginia And Kentucky Resolutions

    856 Words  | 4 Pages

    The resolution made it clear that it was wrong to allow the exercise of power by “Alien and Sedation Acts." In this case, the powers in these acts were not delegated to the federal government . It can be argued that the nullification proclamation was misguided. It declared that the people of South Carolina shall consider all acts developed by the Federal Government to abolish or shut its ports, or block free entry of vessels to the ports. This was inconsistent with the long-term continuance of the state with the union.

    Read More

  • Why John C. Calhoun Supported States Rights

    171 Words  | 1 Pages

    JOHN CALHOUN: John C. Calhoun served as Adams vice president, Calhoun supported states rights. Calhoun to prevent the federal government from weakening states rights. John C. Calhoun was a very significant individual in the South and in our country. John C. Calhoun was a young war hawk that got elected to Congress. He favored going to war with Great Britain.

    Read More

  • Liberty And Union Speech By The Citizens Of South Carolina And Daniel Webster

    1213 Words  | 5 Pages

    1). In both documents Daniel Webster and the citizens of South Carolina convey a strong argument regarding the topic of states being able to nullify federal laws. In the Liberty and Union speech, Daniel Webster addresses the topic and opposes the doctrine by stating how the government and Constitution was created by and for the people and on how the American people have preserved their own chosen Constitution for the past 40 years since it has been created. Because of this, the American people have prospered happily, grown and become stronger with America, as the country has progressed. While Daniel Webster stated valid points regarding South Carolina’s Senator Robert Haynes, in 1832, South Carolina held a convention to represent their official position on the nullification of federal laws towards President Andrew Jackson and the tariffs of 1832.

    Read More

  • John C Calhoun Character Traits

    1419 Words  | 6 Pages

    In this essay he claimed original sovereignty for the people acting through the states and advocated state veto or nullification of any national law that was held to impinge on minority interests. He later developed the argument in his two essays Disquisition on Government and Discourse on the Constitution, presenting the classic case for minority rights within the framework of majority rule. A moderate during the nullification crisis of 1832-1833, Calhoun joined with Henry Clay in working out the Compromise

    Read More

  • Nullification Crisis Dbq

    493 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many Southerners like John C. Calhoun, who was the Vice President at the time, were extremely upset about. They thought something had to be done. That’s when South Carolina Exposition and Protest came into play. This wasn’t an actual protest of people who didn’t like the tax on imported goods. It was an important document written by John C. Calhoun.

    Read More

  • Civil War South Vs North

    386 Words  | 2 Pages

    South vs North The south thought they could do what they wanted .Before the Civil War the South depended on slavery and the North was more of a Industrial. Then there were arguments about slavery should not be in the new states .People came up with compromises to fix all the fuss of which state is free and which state is a slave one.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson And The Nullification Act Of 1832

    1122 Words  | 5 Pages

    The President of the United States at this time was Andrew Jackson. During Jackson’s terms, he had to deal with a majority of significant issues. One of the topics was the Nullification Act in 1832. According to this document, it was Jackson’s view and voice about this matter. As he mentions “That the people of South Carolina will maintain the said ordinance at every hazard, and that they will consider the passage of any act by Congress…”

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson's Legacy

    874 Words  | 4 Pages

    As the seventh president of the United States, Andrew Jackson had a significant presidency that is still debated about today. Andrew Jackson’s legacy is tarnished by his treatment of slaves, removal of Native Americans with the Indian Removal Act of 1830, and the political turmoil involving his cabinet. Despite this, Andrew Jackson is ranked among the top ten presidents because his presidency significantly shaped the United States. From a very young age, Andrew Jackson was a patriot at heart and fought for his country. During the Revolutionary War, young Andrew Jackson was a messenger boy who delivered letters and messages through the dense woods of the Carolinas to the American troops.

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Jackson Deal With Sectionalism

    596 Words  | 3 Pages

    The divide of the United States began in 1828, when President Jackson approved Congress’ bill to double the tariff rates on imports. Immediately the southerners accused Jackson of favoriting the North and their industrial culture. The South, which was predominantly agricultural, relied heavily on British imports, and the new tariff, or the Tariff of Abominations, would make the goods far more expensive. Soon even Vice President felt that he must decide between the government, and his homeland in the South. Siding with the southerners, he wrote the doctrine of nullification, which expressed that the states had the right to disregard any act of Congress that was viewed as

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq

    819 Words  | 4 Pages

    On December 10, 1832, President Andrew Jackson issued a proclamation to the people of South Carolina that a state had no right to nullify a federal law. South Carolina and John C. Calhoun felt that the tariff acts of 1828 and 1832 favored Northern-manufacturing over the expense of Southern farmers. After this, Jackson

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    Clay wanted to keep the nation together. Henry Clay, a Senator, was someone who wanted to keep the nation together, so he gave a speech to the Senate in 1833 about how South Carolina cannot secede and become an independent state, and doesn't want to. “I say it is impossible that South Carolina ever desired for a moment to become a separate and independent state” (Doc A). For the people that were against slavery, they held anti-slavery conventions, talking about how awful slavery is and even called slave

    Read More

  • Why Did The American Civil War Was Inevitable?

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, these differences show that the North and South were actually two distinct countries held together by one constitution. The North felt that decisions regarding slavery and its legality were entrenched in the central government while the South felt that such decision belonged to the individual states. In the times preceding the war, both sides could not reach a compromise. Bonner mentions, “Because secession and war were permitted to come, warned Russel, "We are not entitled to lay the flattering unction to our souls that the Civil War was an inevitable conflict (Bonner, 195).” Hence, these differences could only be addressed through war.

    Read More

  • The South Carolina Exposition And Protest By John C. Calhoun

    146 Words  | 1 Pages

    Both the South Carolina Exposition and Protest and the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions were both based on states’ rights and the concept of nullification; which is the

    Read More

More about Nullification Dbq Essay

Open Document