H.J. McCloskey’s article “On Being an Atheist” he argues the existence of God and we should abandoned all “proofs” of this idea. In approaching the question of God’s existence, we cannot prove God or that other things exist. Proof is a certainty and without a shadow of doubt. However, it is possible I could be wrong, but I don’t believe I am. The best explanation of God’s existence is seen in certain effects we see in the universe such as science. Scientist tell us there is a hole in the ozone layer, however, we can’t see that, yet many people believe it. Let’s consider another example, cancer, known to kill millions every year, yet science is still unsuccessful in finding a cure, but it does not mean one is not out there. There are many other …show more content…
In the article “The Absurdity of Life without God”, William Lane Craig argues: “If life ends at the grave, then it does not make no difference whether one has lived as a Stalin or a saint”. In his argument Craig’s idea is that mortality exists because of God. There is truth in this statement because without the Creator, man would not discern right from wrong and would not have any understanding of morality. McCloskey’s idea is somewhat disturbing because if atheism claims morality is relative many cultures view morality very different and murder could as just as well be celebrated as a wedding day. Craig also states that life without God lacks purpose, “If there is no God, then our life is not fundamentally different from that of a dog”. However, I must say, even dogs have a purpose because some are trained as service animals. For example, the blind have seeing-eye dogs, some are used in healing therapy trained as healing pets, and others are trained to protect their masters. However, God’s highest creation is mankind and we were made in the image of God and created to worship and glorify Him. In the evolutionary process there is no purpose or significance for life and everything that we have done will be meaningless. Craig states: “Man cannot live life without value, meaning and purpose.” Life cannot be defined by chance and shows ignorance amplified. I cannot fathom a universe where man chooses the laws of right and wrong. As we observe the universe today, we can see how man’s way of doing things always leads to adversity and chaos and when things get out of control or disaster comes they want to blame God instead of the decisions that were made. However, that is a whole other
RRR: The Culture of Denial In the essay “The Culture of Denial” (2015) by Christopher Delgado, he expounds on the opinion that there is an issue within the public with the trusting of the scientific community’s discoveries. Delgado does this by providing numerous examples of the kind of discoveries that a good amount of the public does not fully believe along with some examples of why those people do not trust said scientific concept. Delgado explains this in order to expose the masses to how much we mistrust the scientific community, and how we must alter that mistrust into trust. The intended audience for this reading is the general public, or specifically the ones who are in denial of scientific information.
Web. 16 Dec. 2015. This article seeks to argue and find evidence that there is a God. Through the use of social science and research, this article focuses on establishing the validity and reliability of evidence in social research and concludes that the case study approach is valid for providing empirical scientific evidence for the existence of God.
What is are purpose of being here on this Earth? That question has been asked by so many, but there hasn’t been a clear answer as to why are we are here. According to the bible it states, “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” Religion throughout history has been the root cause of most major issues and has an impact on everyone’s lives. The different interpretation of religion has been the primary cause of equal right issues and has even continued in today’s society.
The atheists seek to exploit the existence of human suffering in the face of an Omni-benevolent God as a contradiction, and since human suffering exists then God must not exist. Indeed, this is a challenging subject and Brother Warren devoted this book to
(Genesis 1:26-30). Just like Adam we are all capable of doing God’s will but we must also live by faith and obedience and I think that’s our purpose (Genesis 2:15, 17).
Using the premise for P.D. James’ novel “The Children of Men”, Samuel Scheffler, in his lectures on “Death and the Afterlife”, explores reactions to the hypothetical scenario of a world where human beings have become infertile, with no recorded birth having occurred in more than twenty-five years. While everyone would live a normal life span, we remain faced with the threat of human extinction as the last generation dies out. According to Scheffler, nature of what we value, and how we attribute this value reveal their dependence on our belief in the afterlife. When our confidence in this belief is diminished, as in the aforementioned infertility scenario, many of the things that matter to us—such our projects and activities—would come to matter to us less, in the sense that we would be less motivated to engage with them (less emotionally invested, and less convinced of their value or worth.) Scheffler’s interpretation of the term afterlife differs from the typical personal afterlife, which assumes that we will survive our own deaths and be reunited eventually with our loved ones.
For this disputation, I had the pleasure of arguing against the topic of be it resolved that you can convince a non-believer to affirm the existence of God using philosophical arguments. As the opposing side, Sarah and I counter argued the following: the argument from motion, the ontological argument, Pascal’s Wager, the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the moral argument. The argument from motion argues that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and people experience God, therefore God must exist; however it can be counter argued that since faith cannot be demonstrated or experienced, as it is unseen, God cannot exist.
Chloe White Dr. Denison PHIL 1130-D01 29 June 2023 An Analysis of Atheism “How Should an Atheist Think About Death” is an edited e-mail discussion between two philosophers, Todd May and George Yancy. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the concept of atheism. The discussion addresses other religions in umbrella terms to acknowledge the differences between atheism and other ideologies. The article is very professional, it dives into existential concepts, it does not necessarily discriminate against other viewpoints, and part of it is even funny.
He also refers to the cosmological argument to show that God is an all-powerful being who created the universe out of nothing. Furthermore, he claims that suffering in the world is moral in the sense that suffering inflicted on innocents is genuinely evil. Without a God, there would be no objective morals, thus, evil proves God’s existence, as things would not be considered good or evil without a God (Craig, p. 126). In conclusion, evil proves God’s existence and thus the question as to why God permits evil does not work to disprove His existence.
The question that is asked time and time again is whether or not god exists. It is evident that people hold different beliefs. It is evident that through some of the beliefs of J.L. Mackie that it could be argued that God does not actually exist. I find this argument to be more agreeable. In Mackie’s Evil and Omnipotence, he argues many points to support why it should be believed that god does not exist.
A common questioning of a higher power beyond the physical realm lingers in society: Who and what is God?. However, many of these theological questions cannot be answered until we, of course, die. Due to human’s innate curiosity to understand the forces beyond their own, especially in terms of religion, humans find their own reasons to believe in God in the process of discovery. Religion is a sense of belief and worship to praise a higher power (God), and it provides a guide for human beings to have the opportunity to come together and live as one image of God’s children. “Imagine There’s No Heaven” is an article in which Salman Rushdie, the author, presents an atheistic view where religion is pointless, and a higher being is non-existent.
Feuerbach raised a very important issue when he says that “religion is a projection of human nature into a fantastic divine being.” This singular point raised by Feuerbach marks a rigorous break-away from the idealistic Hegelian philosophy that colonized that era as mentioned earlier in chapter one; Hegel’s idealistic extremism would at least have been revolted against and corrected especially by a philosopher of Feuerbach’s calibre who had youthful experiences and influences from both the philosophical and the religious worlds. However, Feuerbach in his anthropological atheistic theory of God, lost track too, he eventually went into the extremist position of scientism. Religion does not negate or prevent civilization, development in science
In the movie "GOD 'S NOT DEAD", a character with the name of Josh Wheaton once quoted, "Atheist say that no one can prove the existence of God and they 're right, but I say that no one can disprove that God exist. " This is true because many atheists throughout the ages have always questioned the existence of God and try to prove that he is not real but they have not disproved that he does not exist either. Most atheist are philosophers and philosophers use science to try to prove that they are right and say that science has an explanation to why everything exists. "Science 's tools will never prove or disprove God 's existence." Francis Collins is right about this because people cannot prove something that is in the nature of this world to prove something that is supernatural.
Introduction: Professors Richard Dawkins and John Lennox go head to head in a battle to match their superior intellect. The debate was titled “Has Science Buried God?” Lennox also announced his new book “Gods Undertaker”. The John Lennox - Richard Dawkins Debate - bethinking.org. 2015
The meaning of life is whatever we choose it to be. We are in control of given our life meaning, it 's all a matter of perspective. If you decided you want to live your life a certain way and that way makes you happy, then you 're given your life meaning. The meaning of life to me is just to live a healthy, happy, honest lifestyle.