When it comes to abortion, a lot can be said. More specifically, author and philosopher Judith Jarvis Thomson takes her own stand on abortion, saying it is morally permissible to get abortions. Morally, I disagree with her stance on this. The reason I think this way is because I feel that there were other options open to us, than the main one being abortion. These other options, I feel are better and have better outcomes for the child than abortion. Another reason is that aborting a child could mena getting rid of our future generations and what more could come along with that. Religiously speaking, because I am Christian, abortion is wrong and I do not agree with it. Thomson starts her argument by explaining that a line need to be drawn with abortions. She explains that we need to be able to draw a line between when a child is considered a human being and when they are not. Thomson continues her argument by saying that we cannot deny that the fetus eventually becomes a human. Around 10 weeks, she says, is when the fetus starts to develop arms, legs, face, toes, etc. But when talking about a newly fertilized egg, which is a big clump of cells, she says is comparable to an acorn on a tree. With that being …show more content…
I say this because my first thought for me if not to kill the baby. My first thought is that I am going to have this baby, and if I do not want the baby, then there is always adoption. If I were to bring religion into this because I am religious, I would feel an immense amount of conviction if I were to have an abortion, even outside of rape. I am not one to judge someone and tell them that what they are doing is wrong. With that being said, I do not care if someone were to get an abortion, but I will not. I also do not think that I can make laws that force people to do certain things to their bodies because I cannot control their
Within the recent events of the overturning of Roe V Wade the opinions on abortion have been at the forefront of political conversations. Especially among the people who are pro-life and pro-choice. Pro-life believes that an unborn fetus is a life and killing it is killing a person, meanwhile pro-choice is the belief that someone who is carrying the fetus has the right to choose whether they keep it or not. The article “3 Compelling Reasons I am Pro-life” by Tim Counts on the website erlc is about the reasoning behind this man’s point of view. The article uses three points religion, science, and “human flourishing and love”.
Judith Jarvis Thomson and Don Marquis both have extremely strong views on whether or not abortion is permissible. Judith Jarvis Thomson’s pro-choice standpoint defends a woman 's right to do what they want with their body. Don Marquis’s pro-life standpoint defends that a fetus is a person from the time of conception and it has a right to a future. Different situations come into play when it comes to abortion from rape to the mother 's life at risk that affect choices. A woman 's right to choose what to do with her body should absolutely never be taken away.
Abortion Is Morally Permissible written by Mary Anne Warren, argues for abortion. Warren claims that there are five traits of personhood. Since the fetus doesn’t have any of the five traits, they’re not a person and therefore abortion is permissible. She also mentions that in the case of late term abortion of a pregnancy that may cause inconvenience, it is morally permissible. Also the fetus’s potential right to live doesn’t outweigh the women’s right to an abortion.
A fetus is a person just like the mother. This is because life begins at conception and not after birth (Thompson, 2003). Developed fetus has all the features of a human being including face, limbs and other body organs. According to Thompson (2003) both the fetus and the woman has the right to life. This is verifiable particularly when the pregnant womans life is at stake.
Abortion is killing a fetus, a fetus is a person, all person has a right to life, killing someone with a right to life is always wrong. In Thompsons article, she portrays that this statement isn’t always true by making arguments in certain situations that abortion is okay. However, many might disagree with her arguments about abortion but, to which I see to be perfectly thought-out and, explained. A person is not morally bounded to do something for someone else such as to save their life.
One of the most controversial topics in the world that has been debated many years ago to today, is abortion. It is arguable whether or not it should be illegal or legal, but in the 20th and the 21st century, our views on the debated topic have drastically changed from how our society is growing and how the point of view of abortion has altered. The belief of abortion being right and wrong varies on age, gender, or what historian someone reads or listens to. Some historians base their beliefs on others, putting their own research or own belief in it to make it theirs. Heather Ault is an abortion activist, she states her opinion on abortion without putting her on a side of it being right or wrong.
Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion In the article 'A Defense of Abortion' Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible even if the fetus is considered a person. Morally philosophy paper by Judith Jarvis Thomson first published in year 1971, granting for the sake of argument that the fetus has a right to life, she uses thought experiments to argue that the fetus's right to life doesn't trump the pregnant woman's right to control her own body and its life-support functions, and that induced abortion is therefore not morally impermissible. In particular her primary reason for presenting an argument of this nature is that the abortion argument at the time had effectively come to a standstill. The typical anti-abortion argument was based on the idea that a fetus is a person and since killing a person is wrong, therefore abortion is wrong.
Thomson says this is not always the case, Thomson states that a women’s right to autonomy trumps the rights of the fetus. 2. Thomson uses the argument that a women’s rights trump that of the fetuses’ rights. Thompson uses three different analogies to try to persuade the
For example, if there is a complication in pregnancy and the mother can suffer because of the child, I think it is ok to do abortion. It is important to understand the various ideas that go behind abortion. The right of an abortion for a mother should be left on her own decision as the mother knows best about her condition. She is going to be the 'host body ' for the baby, even though her own, for nine months and according to Thompson, the mother should have the right to decide if she wants to foster and go through with the ordeal. But still, there are also a strong debate going on about the human rights of the child:
Hook Let’s say the government chose what you wear, what you eat, how and when you sleep, what career you pursue and who you marry. Wouldn’t you deem this strict? Unfair? Stupid even? Why then do we believe that we or the government should have a say in a woman’s choice of aborting a fetus?
Everyday we make choices and they always have an outcome, whether it’s good or bad. A child makes 3,000 decisions a day, while an adult makes 35,000 decisions a day. If one of those decisions is getting an abortion we should let people make their choice and if it has a bad outcome, then that's their problem. They’ll learn from their mistakes, nobody is perfect. Things are different for everybody.
Some people think women use abortions as an escape from their wrong behavior and careless decisions in life and Some people believe that having an abortion and ending a child’s life will solve their problems but in reality, abortion only hides problems it doesn’t solve them. There is always a solution in every problem, choosing abortion and denying life to a child who already exists is irresponsibly and irreparably wrong. How sad for those who think a child is not worth anything. Children
In Carol Gilligan 's essay, "Concepts of Self and Morality," a college student answers the question of what morality should be by stating, "The basic idea that I cling to is the sanctity of human life" (171). When a woman decides to have an abortion, she overlooks the sanctity of human life and she forgets her morals. Therefore there should not be a question of choice in the matter of
Some people will not have the moral certainty and will kill the fetus for that reason. Of course in the argument the author gives choices, and the decision depends on the understanding of that individual towards
Since 1973, the supreme court in Roe v. Wade established that abortion is a women’s right. Today, the percentage of people that are against, and in favor of abortion are almost the same. Each one of our thoughts are clearly defined, depending on how we have been raised; the religion we may have, and some circumstances as rape,