ipl-logo

Owen Brown Research Paper

686 Words3 Pages

John Brown, the son of Ruth and Owen Brown, was born May 9, 1800 in Torrington, Connecticut. Ruth Brown came from a religious background because her father was a minister. Owen Brown maintains a tanning business which is successful enough to keep food on the table and clothes on their backs but nothing more. Ruth and Owen brown had five children of their own plus one of which they adopted as their own. John brown was their third born child. John Brown was born in Connecticut but shortly after moved to Ohio so Owen could look for a better paying job. Owen taught his children at a young age about God and how God created all whites and blacks equal. Owen was a strong believer that slavery should be abolished and whoever does not agree will be …show more content…

The outcome of the Missouri Compromise was that “Missouri would be admitted to the Union as a slave state and Maine would be admitted as a free state, maintaining the balance between slave and free states and slavery would be outlawed in any U.S. territories north of latitude 36’30”. (15) After the Missouri Compromise, the Anti-Slavery Society was formed. The Anti-Slavery Society was formed in 1830 in order to end slavery after the death of a slave by the name of Nat Turner. The Compromise of 1850 was similar to the Compromise of 1820. The Compromise of 1850 occurred after the Mexican War when it came to decide whether these states should be considered free states or slave states. The outcome of the Compromise of 1850 was that California would be considered a free state while Utah would be considered a slave state. All of these occurrences about slavery led to John Brown’s mission. “In 1820 he married Dianthe Lusk, a young woman from a religious family with strong abolitionist leanings”. (21) John Brown was exactly like his father Owen Brown when it came to raising children. Together, John and Dianthe had seven children but only six

Show More
Related

  • William Howard Day Research Paper

    1414 Words  | 6 Pages

    African American abolitionist William Howard Day was born October 16, 1825 in New York City. William was raised by his mother, Eliza and father John. Day mother Eliza was a founding member of the first AME Zion church and an abolitionist. Day father was a sail maker who fought in the War of 1812 and in Algiers, in 1815, and died when William was four. As a child William mother gave him away to a white ink manufacturer who advocated the abolitionist and temperance movement.

    Read More

  • Charles Grandison Finney, A Woman's Rights Activist

    499 Words  | 2 Pages

    Questions for Days 131-150: 1. Charles Grandison Finney was an evangelist who was a preacher who helped in religiously reviving Americans. He was the first of the professional evangelists. 2. Dorothea Dix was a crusader who supported mentally impaired people.

    Read More

  • How The Missouri Compromise And The Fugitive Slave Act Of 1850

    1174 Words  | 5 Pages

    The North, which were anti-slavery, argued that Congress had the power to prohibit slavery in the new state. Meanwhile, the South,which were pro-slavery, believed that states, rather than the government, should have the right to decide whether they wanted slavery or not therefore they argued that the State of Missouri had the right to decide whether they wanted to be a slave state or not and that it should not be up to the Congress to decide. In an effort to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise which allowed Missouri to be a slave state and allowed Maine into the Union as a free state to resolve crisis, which a member of Congress, Henry Clay, offered. The history surrounding the nineteenth century led to the establishment of the Missouri

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Of 1850

    597 Words  | 3 Pages

    The issue of slavery expansion in the West emerged significantly with Missouri’s intention of entering into the union as a slave state, thus enabling the constitution of the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through Missouri’s aspirations the stabilization of power between the free states and slave states in the senate was undone. To revitalize the equilibrium, a consensus was reached where Missouri would enter as a slave state, with Maine entering a free state to sustain the balance. In subsequent years as the United States gained new territories though the Mexican-American War the slavery expansions disputes reemerged in the senate. California sought admission into the union as a free state, and the equal balance of slave states and free states was,

    Read More

  • Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

    Read More

  • Why Is John Brown A Misguided Fanatic

    173 Words  | 1 Pages

    Did you know that some people,including President Abraham Lincoln, believed that John Brown was a “misguided fanatic?” I believe that John Brown was a “misguided fanatic” because of how he committed treason as well as murder while he was trying to put a stop to slavery. For instance,according to, “The Last Meeting Between Frederick Douglass and John Brown”, Douglass believed that John Brown’s plan of invading the Federal arsenal at Harper 's Ferry, Virginia would “ have been fatal to the work of the helping slaves escape.” Another example, as specified by “John Brown’s Speech”, John Brown never prearranged to murder and commit treason, it just went horribly wrong. Since John Brown did commit treason, I believe that John Brown would have done

    Read More

  • Was John Brown A Radical Abolitionist

    194 Words  | 1 Pages

    John Brown was a radical abolitionist who believed that the only way to end the institution of slavery in the United states is through a violent insurrection--Truly he was a man of Action. Born on the 9th of May 1800, John Brown, who hailed in Torrington, Connecticut was born into an extremely religious christian family who ardently opposed slavery. From his youth it was instilled in him that slavery was wrong. Thus, this belief is what eventually led him to host several violent attacks in the means of putting an end to slavery. In October 1859, together with 21 followers, two of which his sons, John brown instigated an unsuccessful raid to a federal arsenal in Harper’s Ferry, Virginia.

    Read More

  • Was John Brown A Terrorist Or A Freedom Fighter

    326 Words  | 2 Pages

    Brown grew up in a house that didn’t like people having slaves and was very religious. So every decision’s he made he didn’t regret because he was doing it for god or for the slaves. Everything he did he believed it was a mission from god.

    Read More

  • How Did John Lewis Affect The Civil Rights Movement

    601 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Lewis was born in a little town in Alabama, called Troy . He was mostly privileged as a child John Lewis grew up on a family farm. But John did attend a segregated school in Pike County Alabama. One day John was inspired by what he heard on the radio about the bus boycott and the words of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. After that he decided to be apart of the civil rights movement.

    Read More

  • Why Is John Brown Wrong

    922 Words  | 4 Pages

    Another reason why Brown was a failure was because instead of helping his men in battle he was busy ordering food. “As shots rang off the walls, John Brown quietly ordered breakfast from a hotel” (Source 14). Although food is very important to the health of people in general (not just Brown), his men’s lives should have been much more important to him. Him ordering food makes him seem selfish and as if he is a failure since he did not properly show care to his men in battle. There were many more reasons why people thought that Brown was crazy and all of the reasons have evidence to back them up.

    Read More

  • John Brown's Views On Slavery

    403 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Brown 's last speech was said in November 2, 1859. In his speech he talks to the court and states how he want it to free the slaves. John talks about how he went to Missouri he saw how slaves were treated and how they were taken away. ”When I went to Missouri, and there took slaves without the snapping of a gun on either side, moved the through the country, and finally left them in Canada.”(187) Brown wanted to do something when he saw how they were treating the slaves, he thought to himself that he would never disrespect a human being like how they did.

    Read More

  • John Brown Argumentative Essay

    664 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, radicalism of any variety is still dangerous. Though he was well-meaning, John Brown’s actions were not only inexcusable, but has the potential to reflect negatively on the abolitionist cause. John Brown was, in simplest terms, a murderer. In is testament (Doc 1), he uses the abolitionist movement to justify the murders of people in slave states. However, he is quick to admit that he “feel(s) no consciousness of guilt” (Doc 1).

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Sectionalism Analysis

    802 Words  | 4 Pages

    Regarding the sectionalism policies, Andrew Jackson was one notable president who has made an impact on sectionalism. For instance, the First Seminole War was originated in 1817, and this war was originated because Native Americans and American services faced a quarrel as they attempted to evoke African American slaves residing between Seminole groups. Throughout this particular war, Jackson obtained the authority in opposition to the Seminoles. Throughout the duration of this campaign, Jackson apprehended Alexander Arbuthnot and Robert Ambrister. Both Arbuthnot and Ambrister were British and they worsened this issue through delivering weapons for the Seminoles, and they also advocated the Seminoles to battle with Americans for their property

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Compromise Of 1850

    328 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an effort by the United States Congress that was drafted by Henry Clay, who was both the U.S. Senator and the House Representative of Kentucky. This compromise was a series of acts passed in 1850, attempted to reconcile Northern and Southern interests to preserve the Civil War. After the start of the Mexican-American War, conflicts about whether to allow slavery in those new territories to polarized Northern and Southern of the United States raised up. Northerners were in favor the Compromise, since they thought it’s a good chance to stop slavery. On the other hand, Southerners were against it, they thought it threatened their political power because the join of territory--California would disturb the balance of 15 free states and 15 slave states.

    Read More

  • Was John Brown A Misguided Fanatic?

    262 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Brown DBQ Response John Brown and other famous abolitionist took part in what is now known as the raid on Harper’s Ferry. Which started as way to inspire slaves to revolt, but ended up with the death of John Brown and a few others. Some people think of John Brown as a crazy murderer. Although others, such as myself, think of him as a “misguided fanatic.” In other words, according to dictionary.com, misguided means misled or mistaken and fanatic means a person with an extreme and uncritical enthusiasm. John Brown was a “misguided fanatic” because he stood up for what he thought was right even if nobody else did.

    Read More

More about Owen Brown Research Paper

Open Document