D-The patient was placed on HOLD to address her no show for last week. This writer asked the patient if she was okay with tomorrow 's appointment based on her appointment letter. The patient to do the session today since she 's already present and waited for this counselor. This writer agreed to conduct the session. Reports stable on her dose and deny the need for a dose decrease as she denies any cravings/withdrawals.
DCF case status:
According to the patient, her grandson 's mother has unsupervised visitation with her son as long as it is not overnight visitation. Furthermore, her grandson mother has to follow through with DCF recommendation such as having stable housing, no THC, and parenting class.
Patient 's health:
The patient admits to not following through with seeing her PCP about the thyroid issue. This writer strongly advised the patient to scheduled an appointment before her next scheduled session and update this writer, at which the patient agreed to do.
…show more content…
UDS result:
The patient recent was negative from all illicit drugs.
Other:
The patient is not interested in pursuing the mental health services at the moment as she expressed about not being ready for it at this time.
A-Based on this writer 's assessment, the patient appeared to be alert and oriented. No evidence of SI/HI.
P-Next appointment is scheduled on 07/1/2016 at 11am. Patient is aware about being placed on HOLD for the counseling
The counselor decided to wait at the home until the licensee Janice Bryant arrival. The counselor informed Janice that the resident needed to be seen by a physician due to her continued
Attended by Since his 9/9/16 Behavior Clinic visit, Mom reported Ben attends BTC/Day program; walks and exercise daily; She’s counting calories, Ben is still working (picking up paper); still going on community outings with a behavioral residential aide (Addus Health), appetite good, sleeping well and having regular BMs; CSS received copies of Ben’s BATC 10/1/16- 12/30/16 behavior data which show targeted behaviors but no reports of major behavioral issues and 16 absences due to illness. He had 2 reportable incidents per Therap (10/10/16 Physical Aggression & 9/22/16 rectal digging). On10/12/16 he had a visit to American Family care for an ear infection, 10/5/16 had outpatient surgery regarding excessive wax in his ear, seen by his PCP on10/5/16,
R: Client presented well groomed and calm. His mood was euthymic, and his affect was within normal limits. Client’s thought processing was goal directed and coherent while being instructed on LAMP VASH referral. Client reported being worried about meeting his VA claim appeal dateline.
Dr. Keith requested a mental health evaluation on a Mr. Alewine. He is a 28 year old male who presented to the ED via EMS for chest pains, suicidal ideation, and symptoms of psychosis. Mr. Alewine reported arriving in Siler City from Tennessee after a 16 hour bus trip. He reports after his 16 hour trip, he went to a mechanic shop to call 911 for chest pain and suicidal ideation without a plan after stressing about having a place to stake for a few days. Per documentation Mr. Alewine was asked about current chest pain on a scale of 1 to 10, he reports a 1.
She said she thinks she was on drugs at the time. Ms. Morgan has a valid case with the agency dated 7/18/2015 for Dependency. Ms. Morgan is diagnosed with Bipolar and Schizophrenia. Ms. Morgan is not taking medication at this time and she is not receiving mental health care. Ms. Morgan is supposed to receive care through Central City Mental Health Clinic, but missed her appointment and never rescheduled.
D: Client was on time for intake appointment. Together, discussed the assessment recommendation and barriers to successful treatment outcomes. Client reviewed and signed of all treatment admission paperwork, including treatment agreement, ROIs, THS treatment policies, THS alcohol drug Services patient rights, THS patient responsibilities, THS health and safety information, THS counselor disclosure information, patient grievance procedures, THS HIV/AIDS information, THS notice of privacy practices, referral to Quit smoking, and marijuana policy. Treatment plan was developed, which was focused on Dim 4, 5, and 6; focusing on developing readiness to change, identifying relapse potential, and building a strong family and social support system.
1. Have began the process of updating the forms for Psychiatric Evaluations as well as the forms to document follow-ups visits (Medication Management). The purpose is to improve the flow of information, simplify its use, assure the appropriate content, and facilitate arriving to the appropriate billing codes. 2. Met with all extended providers, as well as doctors to continue to ensure consistency in the delivery of quality care and the utilization of best practices, Participation in the MACRA/MIPS on a weekly basis 3.
In summation, Children’s appropriately notified BCBS of this inpatient admission on 01/08/2015. On 01/09/2015 Children’s submitted the clinical information to DeAngela Pearson BCBS UM Nurse to seek appropriate authorization. Children’s was not advised until 01/15/2015 that DeAngela was not handling this patient’s case due to it being an International account which was after the patient was discharged. Children’s did follow the appropriate contract requirements. Please reimburse Children’s for the services rendered to this
Limitations recognised throughout the SDM process were related to risk of further deterioration in the Consumer’s mental state. As the Consumer was slowly taken off his medications, in a safe clinical manner, his presentation deteriorated. The Consumer’s sleep pattern worsened due to the elevation in his mood, there was a noted increase in impulsivity and poor boundaries with others on the inpatient unit, leading to the Consumer becoming vulnerable. There was a prominent increase in erratic and aggressive towards others, leading to the assault of a staff member on the inpatient unit and subsequently required the use of restrictive interventions. The decline in mental state resulted in the Consumer’s father, case manager and treating team coming together for a family meeting with the Consumer present in which the previous medications the Consumer had been previously prescribed were recommenced in an attempt to re-stabilise his presentation, unfortunately this was a substituted decision made by the consumer’s father and treating tream.
Another possibility for Rebecca at the court hearing on the ninth is DOC time at 85%. Rebecca is going to ask for probation domestic violence and anger management at the court hearing. Rebecca takes full responsibility for her charges. Rebecca states that this may be your second time with DCFS
Talk about what went well in the scenario. I perform vitals sings and communicated effectively with Mr. Ahmed. I educated the patient in areas such as dehydration, fall risks, intake and ouptup measurements. In addition, I administer oral and intravenous medication to ensure proper drug
3. How would you engage the client in the treatment planning process? Regarding this question, I would ask
Final Self-Assessment During the FNP III rotation, the student has seen many patients who have complex chronic illnesses than other two rotations that she completed for the FNP I and FNP II courses. The student had many opportunities to independently interview and exam the patients, then come up with differential diagnoses and treatment plan based on the pertinent and impertinent information and evidence-based practice. The preceptor, Dr. Jeanne-Elyse Cedeno, a medical physician/owner of the clinical site, always encouraged the student to think as a primary care provider in many ways. In this paper, the student is going to discuss the progress of the eight objectives (see Appendix A for details), discuss her personal growth and development in the nurse practitioner role, provide the information on what she learned in the clinical that will be valuable to her future practice, and describe any missed opportunities that she did not get out of this experiences as expected, discuss for areas of improvement in the future clinical rotation, and the summarize the final evaluation with her preceptor.
Her complaint was based on the failure of the psychiatrist in informing her whether or not her son’s illness is covered by PMB. Angela laid a complaint to the Department of Health on whose responsibility it was to inform the patient that the condition diagnosed is a PMB. No further answer was sent to her from the 15th of March to date. A follow up is required on this matter.