The play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, is a tale of friendship and betrayal, full of men vying for political power in the city of Rome. Young and ambitious Marc Antony stands out amongst the group as vastly intelligent and well-spoken beyond his years. Antony uses his persuasive skills throughout the course of the play to hide his deceit as well as to change the minds of the Roman people. He does this through using devices that solidify his argument to readers. These persuasive devices are known as pathos, logos, and ethos. Pathos is a form of persuasion that mainly deals with the use of emotion. Logos and ethos are similar except that logos is linked to logic and ethos is used to implore ethics. Mark Antony is able to turn …show more content…
Antony gives the crowd relevant examples of why the murder of Julius Caesar was unnecessary based on his prior actions. When speaking of a previous assembly, he explains, “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?” (Shakespeare 3.2.99-100). Antony takes the members of the group through a reasonable thought process of why they should be enraged over the conspirators. Based on what he says, eh makes it seem as though Caesar has done nothing to deserve his faith and should be avenged. On a similar note, Antony continues by revealing the will Caesar has left behind to his confused and conflicted audience. To the crowd, he remarks, “‘Tis good you know not that you are his heirs; For, if you should, O, what would come of it!” (Shakespeare 3.2.148-149). He logically knows that telling them of what they are to inherit will achieve nothing and only cause an emotional response. However, as a cunning way of achieving what he wants, Antony wishes the audience to be provoked by what they hear. This proves to be the literal final nail in the coffin of conspirators as after the will is read, the mobb beings to destroy the city and hunt the men responsible for
The play by shakespeare called julius caesar was about the story of julius caesar. The story of Julius caesar was that he was stabbed to death by the whole senate. At one part in the play two people named Mark Antony and Brutus started to argue and try to persuade the people in some way by using different rhetorical techniques. Brutus used pathos to persuade the people that he chose right and he was still honorable and caesar deserved to die, but brutus mourned for his death just like the people. Antony used a logos and pathos technique to persuade the people that brutus was bad and that julius did nothing wrong, by using examples Antony made a valid point.
Authors can use ethos, pathos, and logos to connect with the reader and the characters in the play. In the play, “Henry V” by William Shakespeare, Henry can use all three so he can connect with his soldiers. Since Henry is a king he is a warfare expert, he can connect with his men on an emotional level, and he gives them multiple step-by-step processes during the battle to win. To begin with, Henry’s entire speech employs ethos. Since he is king, he should be an expert at taking care of his men, and he should know how to lead men into battle using whatever technological advantages he can provide (Shakespeare).
When trying to convince a group of people to view things a different way, there are different tactics to go about persuading them. The tactics logos, ethos and pathos appeal to the different sides of a person's minds. Logos appeals to logic, often used to persuade an audience through reason. Ethos appeals to ethics, usually used to convince the audience the credibility of the speaker. Pathos is used to appeal to the emotional side of the audience, being used in a way to create an emotional response from the audience in favor of the speaker.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar- Rhetorical Analysis In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, after Brutus brutally executes Caesar in Act 3 Scene 2, Antony is allowed to give a speech to the people of Rome whom have seen witnessed this fatal tragedy in Scene 3. Antony uses anaphora, connotative diction and details throughout his speech to persuade the Romans to change their perspective of Caesar and Brutus. The way Antony speaks about both Caesar & Brutus are a dispute of what he is actually trying to announce to the Romans. At the end of his speech, Antony hopes to reach the Romans emotionally (pathos) by enraging them against Brutus’s false statements against Caesar.
Antony wants to remind the Romans that he is credible for speaking of Caesar “that love my friend, and that they know full well, that gave me public leave to speak of him” (III.ii.215-216) Antony uses ethos after telling the Romans everything to convince them in being against that conspirators’ that he can speak of Caesar because he was a close friend of Caesar. Antony convinces the Romans to retribute the conspirators’ for what they have done “In every wound of Caesar that should move the stones of Rome to rise and mutiny” (III.ii.225-226) Antony wants revenge and is convincing the Romans to riot by using pathos. Antony wants the Romans to feel sorry about Caesar’s death “here was a Caesar! When comes such another?”
By refusing to read the will several times and admitting that what it contains will cause the people to have such a great love for Caesar that knowing he is now dead will be unbearable, Antony ignites curiosity in the people and furthermore, a subconscious feeling of respect and graciousness toward Caesar. Basically, Antony uses Caesar’s will to convince the people that Caesar was a selfless, kind-hearted man and those who killed him should be ashamed and punished for killing an innocent man. Through Antony’s use of paralipsis, he is able to plant a seed of admiration for Caesar and one of hate for the conspirators in the hearts of the plebeians. In his speech to the citizens, Antony also asks many rhetorical questions to cause his audience to pause and reflect on how they really feel, or how Antony wants them to feel, about certain people and events that have recently become important. In one instance.
By comparing the use of ethos, logos, and pathos, in the speeches made by Brutus and Antony, it becomes clear that Antony is more persuasive. Even though the speech made by Brutus had some moments where it was superior overall it wasn’t as persuasive and Antony’s. Antony’s speech successfully convinces the crowd through the three elements being examined. Ethos is credibility for the speaker, by having ethos it becomes easier for the speaker to convince the crowd of something.
In Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,
At the end of the speech, Antony has won the citizens over and they feel that what Brutus and Cassius did was wrong and they want
Antony uses this strategy to persuade the people to go against the conspirators, but needs a strong attention grabber that lets everybody with different tiers of wealth within Rome to be interested in what Marc Antony must say. This act of parallelism that grabs the audience’s attention lets the speech fluently flow into the next part that focuses more on how it was wrong to kill such a brave and selfless leader of
Pathos control the emotions of an audience and evoke a certain feeling to persuade the crowd in this case. Finally, logos convince an audience using reasoning and logic. Antony expresses a variety of persuasive techniques throughout his entire speech and change the mindset of the commoners using ethos, pathos, and logos. In Marc Antony’s speech, he used to persuasive technique known as ethos.
Antony wanted people to be patient with him. He also says, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff” (3.2. 100-101). Antony says this to show that Caesar was a good man who cared about the people. It was also to show that Brutus was wrong when he stated that Caesar was ambitious. Antony makes the citizens feel that the conspirators murder was
Antony is trying to find out whether they believe if Brutus had a valid reason to assassinate Caeser. He achieves his goal of making the murder seem unethical by using his convincing argument. Overall, Mark Antony’s speech was helpful in trying to convince the Plebeians. By the end of his speech, the Plebeians believed that the murder of Julius Caesar by the conspirators was an unrightful doing. The conspirators might’ve gotten away with the murder, but will never be seen the same by the
After bringing out Caesar 's Dead body. Describing what a honorable man his was. And showing them how brutal his killing was. In act three the people are angered and overwhelmed the people kill an innocent man simply because he had the same name as one of the conspirators cinna . the complete chaos ensures rhom may not look seem like a positive reaction to antony 's speech but it is in fact what he wants which is shown through soliloquy through the lack of almost no reaction to brutus logical and ineffective speech it is obvious that antony 's speech is more effective over the people of rome as speeches as a whole this shows that emotional appeal causes a much bigger reaction than logic and reason.
This pulls on the pathos of the audience because the rhetorical question pulls on their conscience. Their conscience is questioning whether the murder of Caesar is justifiable, since he was not all the ambitious according to Antony. This allows for Antony to take advantage of the easily pliable minds in the audience and flip their introspections to vanquish the conspirators. Shakespeare uses the repetition of the word ambitious in Antony’s speech to instigate the plebeians, and fill their minds with enough doubts to get them to rebel against the conspirators. Talking about how Caesar refused the crown three times at the Luperical, Antony proclaims, “Which he did thrice refuse; was this ambition. /Yet