In the years leading up to the Civil War, the Nation struggled to resolve many different sectional issues. These issues and conflicts produced a distinct series of crises and subsequent compromises made in attempts to unify the nation. Nevertheless, the pre-Civil War compromises from 1820 to 1860 only contributed to growing tensions over slave states’ rights. The first compromise of the 1800s that contributed to growing tensions over slaver and states’ rights would have to be the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Leading up to the compromise, tensions between supporters of slavery and those against were very high. This feud reached a climax in 1819 after Missouri requested admission into America as a slave state. This did not go over well with many …show more content…
Zachary Taylor, or “Old Rough and Ready” as he was commonly referred to as, became a public figure as a military commander during the Mexican-American War. During the war, Taylor was revered for his willingness to fight alongside his men on the stage of battle. This constant readiness, coupled with a military victory in Buena Vista that had been directly ordered against by President Polk, garnered Taylor support from the Whig Party. In 1849 Zachary Taylor took presidential office, while the Union was in the midst of conflict over slavery and westward expansion. After the discovery of gold in California the year before, Americans were eager to find the riches of this region. Consequently, over 80,000 people rushed to California in 1849 alone, and then in 1850 the state of California applied for statehood. This then raised the question, would California be a slave or free state? Due to the high stakes of the matter, a compromise had to be struck. This leads America to the Compromise of 1850. At the time the compromise seemed to serve as a fix to all of the Union’s problems, but this philosophy was proved to be short …show more content…
Douglas had expressed a distinct want for a transcontinental railroad. This railroad would connect Chicago directly to California, but many states were against the proposal. In spite of the benefits that the railroad would offer, the Southern States refused to have federal funds spent on a railroad that would pass strictly on territory that was closed to slavery. In an attempt to appease the Southern States, Douglas introduced the Nebraska Bill, also known as the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The act split the large area of Nebraska into two sections, Nebraska and Kansas. Both sections were to be able to decide on the issue of slavery based upon popular sovereignty, and the Missouri Compromise would be gotten rid of. This act was passed some years later under the administration of President Franklin Pierce. In an attempt to end the spread of slavery, anti-slavery northerners formed the Republican Party in direct opposition of the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Moreover, uprisings began in Kansas and pro and anti-slavery forces began acting against each other. In 1856 pro-slavery men attacked Lawrence, Kansas. A raid on Pottawatomie Creek led by Jon Brown followed this. Feuds were then further perpetuated by the election of 1856 and the important events that took place during that
A compromise cannot be reached regarding the case of slavery if Congress cannot make any laws in reference to slavery. This then caused a compromise in 1860 to be quite difficult to come about compared to the compromises that had been created in the
Also, I will be explaining what the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was. January of 1854 Sen. Stephen Douglas wrote a bill that would divide the land in the west of Missouri into two states Nebraska and Kansas. Douglas wanted popular sovereignty for both states; this would allow the residents of the two states to vote on if slavery would be legal in new states. Groups against slavery were against Douglas’s push for popular sovereignty, because without the ability to vote slavery would not be allowed in the new
One key issue between the two parts of the country was whether or not slavery would expand westward to any newly acquired territories. This had been an issue for a long time and ultimately after failing to reach a compromise the country fell back on popular sovereignty or letting people in the new territories decide whether or not they wanted slaver. This however provided no solution as can be seen in the incident “Bleeding Kansas”. This was a series of violent acts in Kansas between those who were for and against slaver.
By the mid-nineteenth century, the Constitution had been put into the fiery crucible that was the issue of slavery, littering the antebellum era with political controversy. The national structure framed by the Founding Fathers in 1787, initially intended to bring unity, was now the primary grounds from which the question of slavery was bringing sectional conflict and national disharmony as a result of mass-moral compromise. The Constitution of the United States was instituted to encourage the unification of the stark sectional divide within the nation. However, rather than achieve its purpose, the Constitution was contorted and employed by both sections to further their envisioned future of the country.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a bill that essentially disregarded and relinquished the Missouri Compromise. The Kansas-Nebraska Act stated that any westward expansion of the United States was to have the decision on slavery made via popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty, in regards to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, was the idea that the decision on slavery in a region should be decided by the people who live there. This seemed fair, but the issue with instating popular sovereignty was that the parameters of the Missouri Compromise stated that slavery could not exist anywhere above the 36°30° line (History.com). Therefore, popular sovereignty would entirely disregard important factors of the Missouri Compromise, which was regarded by many as a strong force in holding the Union
DBQ: Political Disputes 1820-1860 For forty-four years, the United States of America was a thriving country. We had won our independence from Great Britain and we had started to create a country that would change the world. Yet, in the year 1860, a joined country and political agreement between all states seemed utterly impossible. People fought with each other so deeply about slavery, the country was divided between slave and free states. By the time of 1820 through 1860, political disagreement grew so large, there had been only one answer.
Even those who benefited from Southern slavery, such as textile manufacturers, did not wish to see slavery expand further west or north. The Kansas-Nebraska Act succeeded only in shifting Northern public opinion even further away from reconciliation with the South. The Kansas-Nebraska Act also caused the collapse of both the Whig and Democratic parties. The parties split according to section: to pass the act through Congress, Southern Whigs voted with Southern Democrats against their Northern counterparts for the first time in history.
In the years on up to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, tensions began to rise between pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups across the country. The horrible compromise that sacrificed the rights of African Americans in favor of a more stronger union in the states exploded once more in 1819 when Missouri requested to join the United States as a slave state. In 1819, the nation had eleven free and eleven slave states creating a balance in the U.S. senate. Missouri's entrance threatened to throw this parity in favor of slave’s strong feelings toward it. The debate in Congress over the admission of Missouri was unusally and extraordinary bitter after Congressman James Tallmadge from New York put forward an idea that slavery be banned in the new state.
The compromise of 1850 was the cause of the civil war. The problem started when California came in as a free state. The South didn’t want California to enter the Union because they would enter as a free state because the South was scared that if more free states came in they would eventually lose power in the Senate. The compromise of 1850 had four parts; California would come in as a free state, slave trade would be abolished in Washington D.C., Utah and New Mexico would decide whether or not they would allow slavery, and the fugitive slave act was made.
The goal of this act was to make the people of those countries vote and decide to be free or slave. Nebraska is Brown’s birthplace. This solution of Kansas-Nebraska Act failed because it created competition between antislavery and proslavery. Therefore, they established a war and bloodshed between the two proslavery and antislavery. In 1885, a pro-slavery from Missourians came to Kansas; said that they would vote for slave and kill anyone else who do not vote for the slave.
The U.S was only able to settle political disputes through compromise until 1860 because of the increasing sectionalism, the Abolitionist Movement and the Secession of South Carolina. New states joined into congress creating an unbalanced senate forcing congress to make decisions to balance the nation between freedom and slavery. The Missouri Compromise failed as an attempt to maintain peace between the North and South because it created an greater sense of sectionalism throughout the country. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a decision to make Missouri a slave state to maintain an even number of free and slave states. It led to uproar in congress and the North retaliated by declaring the rest of the Louisiana territory to be free.
The aftermath of the Civil War caused drastic transformations among the American people between the years 1860 and 1880. Of these changes rose the issues of political and social relations within the nation. The issues of political and social relationships arose among several different groups of people, causing these relationships to drastically change. Through the transformations of public liberty, right of succession, and slavery, the Civil War and it's inevitable aftermath was able to alter the political and social relationships that had been instilled in the fabric of America before the times of 1860.
The Compromise of 1850 was an agreement that was made to defuse the crisis over slavery. Thus the issue of slavery in fact had the biggest impact that eventually led to the outbreak of the Civil War.” Henry Clay was the one who introduced The Compromise of 1850 into Congress. The Compromise of 1850 was the an agreement that attempted to defuse the crisis of slavery. California asked and was granted permission to go into the Union as a free state.
Before the Civil War, Americans tried to resolve their differences between free states and slave states by enacting compromises. The Missouri Compromise and the three-fifths compromise were temporary solutions used to keep the south happy in hopes that they wouldn’t secede. These compromises failed because neither the free states, nor the slave states where happy with the compromise. The failure of these compromises were what led to a war between the north and South.
There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.