Death Penalty
January 26, 2017 a forty three year old man was executed for the death of two white people. After sitting on death row in prison for thirteen years he was finally put to his death. People are murdered everyday and for those families of the victims they are affected more than anyone and deserve justice for their loved one. Well that’s where the death penalty comes in, executing a criminal that has murdered in a terrible fashion. When one human kills another human they should go through the pain that their victim did; but sadly that is not the case. On an average there are 16000 murders a year but only around two thousand are put on death row(Reference.com), which leaves fourteen thousand families without justice and knowing the
…show more content…
Like Jill Filipovic said in “Dylan Roof Is Evil. Dont Kill Him” article; "How do you justify saving one life when you took nine, and in such a brutal fashion?". How can some one so evil that took nine innocent peoples live be able to live in prison the rest of his life? Well they should not even have a glimpse of prison he should be taken dtraight from court to the chair; if the murder is proven guilty and admits to it and has hard evidence against them there should be no option. The prime example in the article “Dylan Roof Is Evil. Dont Kill Him” is “Roof was welcomed into a Bible study at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina, where he opened fire and shot dead nine people” On a normal night in Charleston, South Carolina, normal innocent people were just trying to worship toghther and fellowship with one another; then one man comes in and shoots nine people that did no wrong to him and he may have the option to live the rest of his life in prision. He should be put to death and give justice to the family he has done so much
I'm not for killing people because we're (the government/prisons) killing people to show that killing isn't right and that makes zero sense but it should be somewhat fair make his life hell, or something he shouldn't get just life in prison he should have to work hard and want to get
He took the life of not 1, not 2, but 13 innocent lives some of which were children who has not even been able to experience life yet. No human should be put in a situation where they fear for their lives or they get their lives taken because of someone's
Some criminals deserve to die because they should not have the privilege to live 30 years after, from being sentenced to death for committing first degree murder. For example, there has been a case, in 1984, where Kermit Alexander’s family was murdered. As a matter of fact, the criminals have not been executed since they have received the death sentence.
On April 19, 1995 our lives as Oklahomans changed forever. A single man named Timothy McVeigh, with the help of two others, took the lives of 168 people and ruined hundreds. Out of those 168 people, 19 of them were little children and even babies from the daycare. He took the lives of innocent children and people that were strangers to him. Timothy McVeigh most definitely should have received the death penalty instead of life in prison.
Many Americans question if McVeigh should’ve been sentenced to life in prison or death. The final say was that Timothy McVeigh should get sentenced to the death penalty. April 19, 1995 is marked on America’s history as the OKC Bombing. Timothy McVeigh could have been one of the most heartless people you could’ve ever met, “ ‘I bombed the Murrah Building,’ he stated flatly, adding later: ‘It was my choice, and my control, to hit that building when it was full.’” (Michel) Reports, Investigators, and many other
That means a wrongful conviction rate of 1 percent would translate to 20,000 people punished for crimes they didn't commit. On death row, 1 in 25 are likely innocent, according to a recent study” (Matt,
“Given the historic awfulness-168 deaths, including 19 hapless children those who favor putting him to death can certainly argue that this is precisely the kind of case the death penalty was intended for” (Morgenthau). Timothys rage was taken to an extreme and it still takes a toll on victims twenty-one years later. Most agreed that death by lethal injection was the way to go. Others argue that he should suffer in prison. McVeigh felt no remorse for any of the lives he took.
The FBI collection of articles of Famous Cases & Criminals prominently portrays the mass murder mayhem of Timothy McVeigh 's efforts to topple the government, thus making headline news in many area news articles around the world. Timothy McVeigh was sentenced to death because he took many lives, performed a terrorist bombing on a government building in Oklahoma City, and received fifteen counts of murder, and as Exodus 21:24 states, “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” This is a concept on which capital punishment is based. Personally speaking, every person should have a chance to make up for their mistakes, ensuring that their soul may go through some healing.
Being on death row often prolongs the pain for the inmate. They spend their time in prison fearing the inevitable which for them is death. Today, we live in a society that is very divided on this issue. There are many in support of the death penalty, suggesting that it acts as a positive deterrent against future crime. There are also many
Additionally, many people believe that the death penalty will stop future criminals from doing terrible crimes. However, the South has the highest execution rate in the US and they also have the highest homicide rate while the Northeast has the lowest execution rate and the lowest homicide rate (DPIC). The death penalty will not stop criminals from doing terrible
A question we need to ask ourselves and our judicial system is if we should be able to kill, and who deserves the power to make that decision? Throughout history in America, our judicial system has always used retributive justice as a way to condemn crime and give out punishment. Retributive justice is a system that focuses on punishing the offender rather than preventing and rehabilitating. This way of dealing with crime has only harmed the people involved and created more problems like poverty, and unjust cases, and makes it harder for convicts to live life in the future. The book ‘Just Mercy’ written by Bryan Stevenson covers these issues that thousands of Americans face, even today.
I agree with the decision of him being sentenced for life. He killed two innocent people and was making an attempt on a third person. I think a rightful punishment is life in
Killing another seems very unjustifiable, which might be the case but when someone takes another 's life and sent to prison, death row or capital punishment is needed to put that person were they belong. People like that deserve to die because of their mistake of killing another and it deters other people to not kill others, showing them what would happen. In the case of Capital Punishment, Hunting for Sport, or George and Lennie, killing is a justifiable act. In the case of capital punishment killing is justified and needs to be done. For example, “Some crimes are so inherently evil they demand strict penalties up to and including death”(McClatchy).
Death Penalty According to the 2010 Gallup Poll, 64% of the United State of America are supporting the death penalty, I as an American am part of that 36% that is against it. I do not believe that we as human being should determine whether another person should live or die. A second reason that I am against the death penalty is for the reason that the accused person could be innocent and normally the accused person only has one court presentation and is only judged by the judge not a jury of their peer, and is sent to death row where they pay for a crime that they haven’t done. My final reason that i do not believe that the death penalty should count as a punishment for the American people is because, a person that has done a massive massacre shouldn’t just be able to leave the world just like that without paying and suffering for what they have done, Or should the death punishment continue as it is for it has a great benefit to us as citizens of the United States.
This may not be an overwhelming amount, but we don‘t really know how many innocent lives have really been taken. Now with that being said even if the amount of innocent lives taken is very small that‘s still an awful thing to happen. Is the death pentaly worth the risk of any innocent lives? Or it might be very unlikely that it‘ll happen because according to this same article death penalty cases are taken with extreme caution, and if there is any doubt most of the time the defendent will be senteced to life imprisonment or exonerated „Advocates for a defendant are much more likely to pursue any plausible postconviction claim of innocence if the defendant is under sentence of death. “ "NCIB PMC Barbara O 'Brian, Chen Hu, Edward H.Kennedy, Samuel R. Gross,“ Another concern to think about is, is there really any humane way to perform the death penalty?