Watching this year’s election was shocking. Against all predictions, against every analysis, Donald Trump became the president-elect of the United States. But were those predictions really off? As the LA Times put it,” Hillary Clinton got roughly the same number of votes that President Obama received four years ago en route to his reelection, but she nonetheless lost the presidency to Donald Trump, who came in at least 2.8 million votes behind her.” This is, of course, because of the electoral college. Should we really put the decision of an archaic system over the voice of us, the people? No, we should not. The electoral college is outdated and undemocratic. The electoral college was created at the birth of the United States for two reasons. …show more content…
In states that are heavily democratic or heavily republican (the “safe states”), a part of the population’s vote is simply ignored. A democrat living in Alabama is ignored. A republican living in New York is ignored. Their votes might as well be thrown away. Is this democratic? It certainly discourages voting on both sides. Another imbalance comes from the number of a state’s electors versus its population. The number of electors is based on a state’s presence in congress, with one elector per senator and representative. This means that each state has a different number of votes per elector. By dividing the population by the number of electors, we can figure out that Wisconsin has one elector for roughly each 575,000 people. Compare this to Wyoming, which has an elector per roughly 200,000 votes. A vote in Wyoming is therefore three times as powerful as one in Wisconsin. This is not fair, and this is not democratic. Each person should get one vote, which is equal to every other vote. Even if the imbalances were fixed, electors aren’t even required to vote for who they pledge for. A few have already decided to abandon Trump. According to the Huffington post, twenty nine states have laws in place to punish these faithless electors, but not a single one has been successfully prosecuted. In the third largest nation in the world, the final decision rests on the shoulders of a few
Walter E. Williams discuss how Hillary Clinton blamed the electoral college for her losing the presidential election. Williams stated that many individuals believed that the electoral college is dangerous when it comes to American politics. Individuals also claims that there are three electoral votes, or one electoral vote per 200,000 people in the state of Wyoming which was another factor that weight in the presidential election. In California, one electoral vote equals 715,000 people. Williams also stated that there a lot of individual who complain about using the electoral college since they believe that it’s undemocratic.
In Wyoming, each vote is worth 187,875 people.(Doc 2). Each vote in North Carolina is worth three times more than that of Wyoming’s. This is not fair. An election that chooses the next leader of the free world should be a fair election. If the United States were to keep the electoral college system they should make every electoral vote count for the same amount of people.
By relying on this method of distribution, and capping the number of electors allowed, the Electoral College causes inaccurate representation. States that require more representatives to represent the votes of their larger populations cannot receive them due to smaller states taking up the minimum requirement of three votes, no matter how small their populations may be. Not only this, but a combinations of thirteen states and regions, whose combined population is only 12,500,722, receives 44 electoral votes, while a state like Illinois with a population of 12,830,632 receives only 20 (Document D). Thus the Electoral College gives more power to smaller states and less to larger states due to its requirements. This means that some citizens are favored over others in the electoral vote, based solely upon the population of the state in which they live.
The recent presidential election has had a controversy on the abolishment of the Electoral College. With many citizens not understanding whether or not their vote is actually being counted during the election, more debates have risen on if popular vote should be the deciding factor of presidential determinations instead. Popular vote is an actual count of individual votes from all states in America while the Electoral College is a measure of the House of Representatives and Senators choosing directly who the president should be (Kimberling, 1992). The reasoning behind why the Electoral College was the determining factor for president was declared by the founding fathers decades ago to ensure equality (Pavia, 2011). Recently, critics have expressed that this system is not as equal as predetermined.
The electoral college is not as effective as it was in the past, we have more people now and there are more laws placed so that everyone could vote. The electoral college has many problems due to the ‘swing states’ which are the most densely populated states causing the state vote to have too much power. If America were to get rid of the electoral college then every vote will count and everyone would have the same amount of
The Electoral College in the first place is extremely unfitting of a democratic country. It was created by the Founding Fathers with the intent to take the power to elect a president out of the peoples’ hands. They believed that compared to themselves,
Electoral votes are portioned out by adding the number of senate members to the number of house members. This gives smaller states a huge advantage because the number of house members is based on population; meaning, small states who only have one house member about triple the voting power of the individuals that inhabit that state. An example is Wyoming only has one house member, so when the two senate members are added Wyoming’s voting power increases three fold. California, on the other hand, has 53 house members. When the two senate members are added then California’s voting power only increases by less than four percent.
The Electoral College is a terrible system designed for electing the president of the United States. For the people who do not really know or understand the Electoral College, it is a body of people who ultimately decide who wins the presidential election. Each state holds an election for the popular vote. The candidate who wins of the state's popular vote gets all the states allowed electoral votes. How many electoral votes a state gets is determined by the population of the state.
For example disproportionate state votes, tie votes, and unbound electors are hindering democracy. The first and foremost issue is voting. Each state is provided one electoral vote for each member of its delegation, However, depending on a state 's population the amount of electoral votes varies. For example, "an individual in Wyoming has more than triple the weight in electoral votes compared to a citizen in California.
Joel Hale 1. In the first article it is stated that after Trump had won the election even though he had lost the popular vote, several angry Democrats and liberals were calling for the abolition of the Electoral College. The Electoral College was designed to prevent coastal elites from large states from getting to pick the president. People were furious that Clinton didn’t win, and millions of people in California, New York, and other states wrongly believed that their support would affect the outcome. A suggestion for moving forward is keeping the Electoral College, with some minor changes, and get rid of the popular vote.
As an encouragement to vote most of us have probably been told, “every vote counts” at some point in our lives. In reality, this is not true in presidential elections due to the Electoral College and what it does. The Electoral College has flaws in it that can prohibit the outcome of the election from accurately reflecting whom a majority the people of the country cast their vote for. Not only will he abolishment of the electoral college change the outcome of elections, it can change the whole campaign process and the way some people in less represented states feel about voting increasing voter turnout.
In the 2016 presidential election Donald Trump, a generally unfavored Republican candidate, won presidency under the Electoral College. Democrat nominee, Hilary Clinton, on the other hand, won the popular vote—the vote that represents the actual votes of the citizens, not the electors of each state. Clinton won nearly 3 million more votes than Trump and lost the election because of the Electoral College. The George Bush v. Albert Gore Jr. 2000 presidential election results demonstrate the same outcome. Gore won the popular vote, but ultimately, Bush won the presidency because he won the Electoral College (Boxer, 2017).
Then, they build campaign platforms with a national focus, which means that the winner will serve all of the country’s needs. If the election only depended on the popular vote, candidates could limit campaigning to heavily populated areas or specific regions. Tina Mullaly, a South Dakota Representative, stated, “the Electoral College protects small state and minority interests and that a national popular vote would be like two wolves and a sheep deciding what’s for dinner.” (Tina Mullaly) Without the electoral college, some states like Iowa and Ohio with small farmers or factory workers they would be ignored for having favor of pandering to metropolitan areas with a higher population density.
At first glance this doesn’t seem like a bad thing, everyone gets an equal say, right? Wrong! This means that Wyoming which has a population of about 500,000 voters will have an the exact same say in presidency as California which has a population of 35 million voters. Essentially, highly populated states will find that their individual votes count proportionality less.
There is more stability within the government, state, and country when there’s only two parties. This also helps the federal government focus on general The Electoral College is the current system of electing a president in America. The system consists of the selection of electors, which is where the electors get together to vote on the candidates, and also where they count the electoral votes. The Electoral College has 528 electors and to elect a candidate they have to get 270 of the electoral votes. Each state’s electoral votes represents how many members in its Congressional delegation, along with one for each member of the House of Representatives, and two for its Senators.