Pros and Cons of Animals in Captivity
Zoos, water parks, and circuses are places that people like to visit because they provide entertainment and a chance to see various animals up close. However, there are groups that are against establishments that place animals in captivity because they believe that the only place animals should be is in their natural habitat. Are these types of establishments really doing more harm to animals than good? Here are some of the points pro and anti animal captivity proponents make.
List of Pros of Animals in Captivity
1. It gives certain species a better chance of survival.
Sometimes an animal gets wounded or might not be able to survive the harsh conditions in the wild during certain seasons. By placing them in shelters or zoos they will be able to recover from their injuries and be protected.
…show more content…
It educates people more about animals.
Scientists and doctors are able to study and care better for animals in captivity. This allows them to develop more medicines to save certain species and to understand the behavior of animals more. Also, people who visit zoos, water parks, and circuses can be educated on how to take better care of animals and the conservation efforts for their species. It also allows them to see animals they would not otherwise have a had a chance to see in person.
3. It can prevent the extinction of certain species. Some zoos and water parks study the breeding nature of animals and help certain species to mate in a safe and comfortable environment so that their population can grow. This is especially helpful for animals who are in danger of extinction. These establishments also help take care of the young to make sure they survive and grow into healthy adult animals instead of being poached or hunted in the wild.
List of Cons of Animals in Captivity
1. It messes with the natural activities of
Have you ever wondered what it would be like if animals that were widely known on Earth went extinct? For many years, animals have been in zoos protected from the wildlife outside. Many people when visiting zoos have not thought about the real answer to why animals have been held captive from their natural habitat. Let me tell you why animals should be kept in zoos because it helps endangered species risk extinction and can help people acknowledge the protection animals need.
There should not be zoos. Thousand of animals every year struggle with the same problem, being locked up. Although this may seem like a questionable argument, this is a major problem in this world and it needs to be fixed now. In this essay there should not be zoos because they make animals unhealthy, they treat animals badly, and animals are better off in the wild.
This proves to be significant because although some say zoos are educational they prove of no worth to the amount of information we as humans obtain. Also when children see how these animals were taken out of their natural habitats and put in synthetic homes it can damage the kids. For instance, there have been cases of bacterial infections that could possibly put the children and adult sin danger. On example of this is e. coli bacteria which can be found in some reptiles areas in the zoo. If people make contact with these animals they can catch this sickness which can lead to potential death.
Zoos have always been something that families love and kids look forward to going to. Kids learn about the animals and the habitats and enjoy the entertainment. It is a great experience for people, but not for the animals. Zoos are downright cruel to Animals. Animals our forced to live in an unreal stressful, and boring conditions.
As referenced in the article “Do Animals Lose In Zoos”, they say that in the past, all zoo animals were treated poorly. Many say that years ago it was a terrible environment for the animals because there would only be a small cage for the animals to walk around in. As the years have past, zoo environments have improved greatly and it is a better choice to put animals in the zoos. Although many people think that animals should stay in the wild, animals should live in zoos because, zoos focus on scientific study and research to help the animals, there is less chance for extinction, and the animals have veterinarians to take care of them when they are sick. Keeping animals from living in zoos is a rather poor choice because, one great way to study many different wild animals that people don’t get to see very often is by going to see them in a zoo.
In particular, animals need to be in their natural environment in order to survive. “In the absence of that, they are permanently stressed to the point where their immune systems are compromised, and they have no defense against the kind of infections that are common to orcas who spend their lives in concrete tanks” (Marino 1). Animals in a human environment can be an endangerment since they are supposed to be adapted to their environment. “Even at the very best of human care and medicine cannot fill the void since, if they are to thrive orcas need ‘orca care’ in an orca environment, not a human one” (Marino 2). Animals used for breeding can be dangerous and result in serious disorders.
But that is not the actual purpose of the zoo and it is rare to see those types of zoos. All in all, with the continuing global threats to the atmosphere it is hard for individuals to visualize zoos as something apart from being essential to the long-term survival of various species. Not just in terms of protecting them and breeding them for reintroduction, but to learn regarding them to assist those still within the wild, as well as to educate and inform the general public about these animals and their world: to pique their interest so they will assist or at least accept the necessity to be more environmentally aware. Sure there are many possibilities for improvement, but these benefits are essential to several species and potentially at least. Without zoos, the world would be a much poorer place.
Being held captive leads animals to have abnormal behaviors that unfortunately can lead to the deaths of people. Although zoos and sea-parks claim they are all about educating the public and conservation we know its
Now, there are some cons to wildlife conservation, but so many more pros. For example, in the book called “Wildlife in the Anthropocene” by Jamie Lorimer she talks about how elephants rarely breed in captivity, but doesn’t explain how. Some good things about elephants in captivity are that they interact with people everyday, and can adapt to various environments. In her book, she never really picks a side so she doesn’t have a strong opinion, but I think they are so crucial to keeping animals alive.
Captivity is the condition of being imprisoned or confined. Is captivity good or is it bad? If humans were put into cages and given only enough food to keep them alive we would call it inhumane. What is the difference from doing the same with animals? The topic concerning captivity has been controversial for years.
Many animals in the wild live dangerous lives trying to survive, but these animals are able to run free and live their lives as they are supposed to. Animals in captivity are fed every day and given their basic life essentials, but do not get the exercise or family nourishment they need. There are pros and cons for animals in captivity. There are several downfalls for animals living in captive environments. Many animals, such as whales and elephants, depend on their family members for moral support and social needs.
To start, Zoos make animals in confinement hurt each other. According to Spanishzoos.org animals hurt each other. when they are in confinement together. This is bad because if the animals hurt each other they could kill each other or severely injure each other. animals even get ill because of zoos.(Spanishzoos.org).
The question of the necessity of zoos is extremely controversial nowadays. There are many people who advocate for replacing them with sanctuaries as they believe money spent on keeping wild animals captive might have been used for conserving them in wild. Others are concerned that zoos serve not only for people's pleasure but for preserving and keeping populations that otherwise would go extinct. There are sufficient arguments for both points of view, expressed in various articles that are dedicated to the significant topic. “Do elephants belong in zoos?” by Jeffrey P. Cohn and “Eight reasons why zoos are good for conservation” by James Borrell are the examples of such articles.
Did you know the first zoo to charge an extra fee did it so they could help the animals? This supports my reasoning that there shouldn't be laws about animals in captivity. Even though some people don't agree with me saying there shouldn't be laws about animal captivity I think there shouldn't be laws because zoos treat the animals better, they have good security, and they save animals. First of all zoos treat animals better than before because say lions if they roared at us we would roar back to them but now we don't roar at them. Also in zoos there used to be in a cage with only grass and straw now they live in a cage that looks like there habitat with real trees.
This leads to many concerns from the public on the physical and mental impacts of captivity on the wild animals. This essay examines the advantages and disadvantages of zoos to lead us to a possible conclusion whether it is ethical to place animals in captivity. We will also examine if zoos have the best possible facilities to keep animals in captivity. Body One of the advantages of having zoos, is to provide protection to some animals that are endangered.