Should female genital mutilation be legalized? Female circumcision also referred to as genital mutilation (FGM) is the action or traditional practice of cutting off the clitoris and sometimes the labia of girls or young women for certain reasons or benefits. This practice has been less considered in our world, but it became an important topic up for debate in certain states and suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO). This process has been practiced for centuries in some part of Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Female circumcision is debated upon because different people have different views on the matter. Most people say that it is safe and assumed to reduce sexually transmitted infections and HIV and many more sex related benefits. …show more content…
Even though there are benefits, there are reasons female circumcision shouldn’t be legalised. “We’ve seen hugely increased attention on this problem in the past few years and we are now waking up to the scale of this terrible practice” (Pamela Geller, September 24, 2015). This practice has disadvantages that are much more considerable than the benefits. It involves removing and damaging healthy and normal female genital tissue, and interferes with the natural functions of girls' and women's bodies. This brings immediate complications such as severe pain and haemorrhage, which can cause death. In most cases or arguments we have for legalising something, the benefits should always outweigh the disadvantages; in this case, the disadvantages seem to outweigh all the benefits. The world health organization has set aside all the possible allegations that it wants it to be legalised. There are certain policy matters that the WHO has set towards this practice of female circumcision. Female genital mutilation can lead to death, severe chronic pain, haemorrhage, urinary retention, urinary tract infections, keloid scars, strictures, fistula, incontinence, infertility, painful intercourse, painful periods, neuroma, recurrent infections, septicaemia, transmission of hepatitis, tetanus and many more other
Continuing with another secondary effect, the ability to abort without defying the Constitution was advertised to have saved the lives of pregnant females. Kate Chopin (1993) used personal experiences with maternal mortalities to reference childbirth and pregnancy in The Awakening (p. 1). Chopin encountered four loved ones pass away during childbirth. These tragedies occurred in the late 1890s to early 1900s, long before medical practices could diagnose issues with a pregnancy. Until the late 1900s, abortions were not safe enough to guarantee that the mother would live from the procedure.
Intro I will be discussing Abortions in the USA, I will discuss Roe v Wade, What the conflict is, and what effect the overturning made last year. What is Roe vs Wade? Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) was a court case in 1973 argued by Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee.
The practice, according to Ahmed, was not generally observed in her society and was seen by women who practiced Islam as a cultural tradition that was not mandated by the religion. Instead of being a religious requirement, circumcision was viewed as a cultural rite of passage for women. In contrast, male Islam routinely performed female circumcision and considered it as a religious need. Men felt that female circumcision was required to preserve a woman's chastity and purity and to keep her from having sex before marriage. Ahmed claims that female circumcision is not an essential Islamic ritual because of the harm it might cause and because of her own experience with it.
Imagine you have to be scared about what's going to happen to your own body. This is what women feel now. In some states, women now have fewer rights to their reproductive health than in 1970. Roe V Wade was passed on January 22, 1973, giving women the right to an abortion. Recently Roe V Wade has been overturned giving the states all power over abortion rights and in turn reproductive rights.
January 22, 1973, was the day that a woman's rights to her body were given back to her. The U.S Supreme Court had made the final decision that making a women’s right to get an abortion illegal violated the fourteenth amendment, the right to privacy, ultimately making it a women’s legal decision to decide whether or not an abortion for them was needed. This is the trial known as Roe v. Wade. Fast forward to today, this exact trial was overturned by the supreme court justices on June 24, 2022.
June 23, 2022 the US Supreme Court made a choice that drastically changed women's health care in many ways, for me, my mom, and my friends. The courts voted 6–3 justices to abolish Roe v Wade: a landmark case that protected the right of abortion. This law is something that has protected women's access and rights to abortions for 50 years. Without this protection, each state is able to individually choose the laws and rights behind abortion. This decision has caused and will cause countless issues across the world such as medical issues, safety issues, and human rights being taken away.
I work at Sonora Regional Medical Center and this week, I have been working at a pediatric clinic and I have learned certain things about circumcisions and when it should be performed on a baby boy. A circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin and, on infants, it is performed within the first few day after birth. It has been found by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), that the benefits of a circumcisions in newborns, outweigh the risks of it, but when the boys age more, it does not necessarily need to be done unless there is a medical reason to do so. There are many benefits to a circumcision including a reduced risk of urinary tract infections, a reduced risk of sexually transmitted diseases in men, reduced risk of penile
America has allowed those to be outlawed. People have sacrificed themselves for them. Women can make their own choices today.
To initiate, the implementation of gender equality laws will help conclude unequal treatment towards women and create opportunities for women to refuse unsafe work and treatments. Also, without the right to make individual choices for body, women 's prosperity, well-being, and potential in society are restricted and gender inequality is therefore perpetuated. According to the academic article, Sexual Health’s Women’s Rights, “120 million girls worldwide have experienced forced intercourse” (Ngcuka) activities against their own individual soul. Many women are suffering from forced physical and sexual violence because of the limited laws and regulations that allow women to refuse unsafe treatments and practices. According to reports, the “ 32
The risk of having this process done illegally could lead to death and or health defects. Women with health conditions would be at risk of receiving suboptimal care. Death rates would rise from unsafe abortions without the safety of medical regulations. Twenty one point six million women experience an unsafe abortion worldwide each year.
The few personal stories from the women who experienced circumcision offer powerful additions to the horrifying nature of genital mutilation and how the poorly done operation forever ruins the women’s hygiene and health. The result of Soraya Mire’s choice to only showcase the graphic parts of female circumcision takes away the cultural meaning and importance of the practice. Soraya Mire’s strong opinion on female circumcision relates closely with the Western approach to viewing external cultures and disagreeing with practices that
Indeed human rights have failed to achieve its goals in many countries around the globe due to economical and political diversities. According to Himalayan Foundation, 20,000 Nepali girls are enslaved. The recent Rohingya refugee crisis and genocide by Burma has questioned human rights defenders. WHO reports say that around 125 million girls and women were victimized of Female Genital Mutilation in 29 countries in Africa, Middle East and Asia. Surprisingly more than 2000 victims of FGM have received treatment at London Hospitals in last three years, reported by Martin Bentham in ‘London Evening Standard’, 2013.
Informative Speech: Female Genital Mutilation Specific Purpose: To inform my audience about female genital mutilation and where the controversy of it all lies. Central Idea: Female Genital Mutilation is a tradition in certain parts of the world. Most of the time these procedures aren 't carried out safely and the final outcome of the girls that have been mutilated are to work as sex slaves. INTRODUCTION (Attention Getter)This is Kizibianca of kenya, africa. At a mere fifteen years old she was woken up at 5 am and led outside of her hut by the the local traditional brothers and female elders.
It’s done in various parts of Asia, Africa, and parts of the Middle East. Typically, the clitioris is removed from the female with no medical personnel and is often unsanitary. An outsider may see this as a violation of the female genitals, which makes it unlawful. However, it is common in these cultures. Whether it is right or wrong is a matter of opinion.
Abortion legalization We can do whatever we want with our body, it is our property. What government can do about this is to suggest, not to suppress. However, more than 300,000 females around the world are carrying a rapist’s child, due to formidable pressure from the government’s authorities. Why should the government care about our body?