The war between the North and the South, also known as the Civil War, was pivotal event for black suffrage and helped shape our modern day society. Although it caused a tragic loss of American life due to discordant values, the Civil War was a necessary evil as the United States would be unrecognizable if it hadn’t. This paper will discuss the multifaceted instigators of the Civil War, the tactical advantages and disadvantages of each dissenting side, and the effects of the war on the daily lives of the Confederate civilians. While the elimination of slavery is often cited as the principal motivation to start the Civil War, there were several other cultural, political, economic. and ideological factors that were major contributions. One of the most understated, yet powerful, causes of the Civil War was the publication of Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Harriet …show more content…
The benefits and drawbacks of the two were antithetical; where one was strong, the other was weak. The Confederacy had a strong morale, its soldiers were equipped with knowledge of the area, many of the most preeminent military officers were from the South, and the South’s soldiers had pre-existing skills that prepared them for war. However, its disadvantages were that the Confederacy had few factories to produce supplies, had few railroads to move troops and supplies, and had a small population able to fight. In contrast, the Union had a copious amount of factories due to its high involvement in industry, had more than 70% of the nation’s railroads, had a larger free population, and had a strong navy. The source of the Unions predicaments lay in the fact that the area of land that needed to be reacquired was ambitious and the Union was in unfamiliar territory which resulted in a lack of morale. It is clear that when one takes these factors into consideration, the North had the
The Northerners, for instance, fought to defend state sovereignty (lecture December 8). Therefore, the causes of the Civil War remain a debate. Although one hundred and fifty-one years have passed, many historians still debate whether the cause of the war was slavery or not. Charles B. Dew in his essay, “Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War”, argues
The North and South were quite different, so during the Civil war, each side had advantages politically, socially, economically, and demographically. One of the Advantages the North had was Political. The South seceded from the Union because they feared the end to slavery, so when they left the union they had no government. After all of the states seceded, they announced the creation of the Confederate States of America.
b. The lack of supplies to the front lines and the needs of the Army led to the creation of the “tax-in-kind” program where the government took one tenth of its citizens’ crops, animals and supplies. V. Conclusion –Both the Union and Confederate governments realized that financing was instrumental to the outcome of the war. The South’s lack of wealth showed to be its Achilles heel as it was unable to pay, equip or supply its troops who ultimately lost their will to fight. The North on the other hand was able to generate wealth through numerous legislative acts and economic policies that lead to the ability to supply its troops and eventually break the will of the Southern soldier.
The American Civil War was in many ways a logical conclusion to the growing differences between the Northern and Southern United States from its beginnings the late 1700’s. The growing sectional differences in politics, economics, and society made war seem nearly inevitable by the year 1861. One major cause of The American Civil War was the Missouri Compromise. This was a cause because the Missouri Compromise the Compromise split the north and south to being slave and non slave territories, which led the country divided.this averted war for 30 years until california was up for grab for whether it was it was a free state, because it crossed both sides of the Missouri Compromise line. In Document 5 Abraham Lincoln states “A house divided against
Uncompromising differences between the South (Confederacy) and the North (Union) created a civil war that lasted five years. During this war, Abraham Lincoln was president. His election led to the secession of many Southern states. After refusing to recognize the Confederacy as its own nation, the American Civil War commenced in 1861. The three main causes of the Civil War between the North and the South were industrial and agricultural economies, politics, and slavery.
When comparing the Union and confederacy, they are a lot of dissimilar attributes between these groups. During the early war between the years 1861-1862, neither side was a 100% prepared for the war but the Union Army was bigger, and could draw on a far bigger populace for substitutions. The Union Army had better equipment and ammunition, and could fabricate their own particular cannons. The Union's powers were comprised of a far bigger rate of workers, and as a rule had great junior and
Almost 156 years ago our United States of America was tragically divided. On April 12, 1861 in Charleston, South Carolina, Fort Sumter had been brought down by the Confederate army. Subsequently, four more states join sides with the confederacy: North Carolina,Virginia, Tennessee and Arkansas resulting in the start of the Civil War. “The Union outweighed the Confederacy in almost every way. Nearly 21 million people lived in 23 states.
The American Civil War was a long and violent conflict, pitting the southern slave-owning Confederacy against the northern, socially progressive “Yankees” of the Union government. The Union government won the war based on many factors, most of which relate to its superior resources but also include poor planning on the part of the Confederacy. At first glance the conflict seemed much more even-handed in appearance than it was in reality. The differences in the attitudes of the two factions were striking. The Confederates were not only convinced that they could not be invaded, but were utterly convinced as to the truth of their cause.
The controversial issue that led to the split between the Union and Confederacy was over the issue of slavery. This eventually led to the secession of the South and brought on the Civil War. The North’s main goal was to preserve the Union while the Confederacy was fighting for their right to have slaves, which would come with independence. However the North had significant advantages over the South yet the Confederacy had a stronger drive to want to win the war.
Various events took place in the United States of America prior to 1865 that shaped its political, economic and social fabrics. This presentation explores these events while pointing out their impacts to the period of 1865, a period of civil war in the United States of America. Some of the events were positive while others were negative, but more importantly, they shaped the experiences of the people in terms of governance and general politics, not only in the united states of America but to the world at large. The events include the American Revolution, abolitionism movements, constitution and constitution amendments, American civil war, and the assassinations of prominent leaders like President Abraham Lincoln. Readers of this presentation
The North tended to rely on brute force, and the ability to simply replace their casualties with more men. If the South was given this type of resource, it would have been a different war with different results. Through the use of brilliant documents, the North gained support from both citizens and border states and changed the emphasis of the war from preserving the union, to the issue of slavery, which people felt strongly about. The separate countries would not survive as well and as easily than if they remained unified. They worked off one another, economically, with the South providing the raw materials and the North providing the finished goods.
Their military advantage was the way that they had skills that made them great soldiers and solid military convention, this implied they battled a cautious war. Their trained soldiers had hunting skills and went to military school. The confederates knew the domain they were fighting on unlike the North. The North's fundamental disadvantage was that they were attacking unfamiliar land with few prepared soldiers, which implied they were left going into obscure domains attempting to conquer an large area to bring the South over into the Union. In some ways it appeared like an unjustifiable fight since the North had a long way to transport troops and supplies, however they had advantages, as well.
The overall cause of the Civil War will most likely remain in a perpetual state of disagreement amongst historians for years to come. The soldiers however, are not often discussed and are usually ignored for prominent military leaders. The experience of an enlisted man sheds light on important social and cultural issues, which surrounded all aspects of the Civil War. Economic and political issues helped fuel the war but race relations were at the heart of the fire. In What This Cruel War Was Over, Chandra Manning seeks to discuss why men from both the North and the South not only joined the war effort, but also why they continued to do so for four grueling years.
Echoing the arguments made in the book, Why the South Lost the Civil War, the same historians in the book, The Elements of Confederate Defeat: Nationalism, War Aims, and Religion, aim to fully explore the reason why the Conference eventually lost the greatest and most vicious conflict on United States soil. Exploring three key themes of nationalism, the war aims of the south, and the religion of the southern states, the authors in the book ultimately claim as their thesis that the Confederacy lost the Civil War for the sole reason that the southern states lacked the morale and the will to successfully win the war. Furthermore, the nationalism of the Confederacy was underscored by the religious consequences and guilt felt by southerners over
Nationalism was a big factor, both Union like Confederate soldiers believed in making their fellow founding fathers proud of what they had become. The book portrays the Confederate soldiers as proud of being “rebels”, quoting names like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson as examples of “rebellious” men in their time period. The Unionists stuck to their idealism of preserving the union, making nationalism more prominent in their area. Both sides also appealed to what the United States was founded on, freedom and liberty. The Unionists believed that they should conserve the government which granted everyone liberty.