After writing the Constitution at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, the journey to ratification began; however, not all states were eager to ratify it due to fear of a strong central government. In order to better convince each state to ratify the Constitution in place of the Articles of Confederation, the Bill of Rights was added as a barrier against the tyranny of a strong central government. The First Amendment includes protection of many civil liberties including freedom of speech, assembly, petition, religion, and the press. The Founding Fathers included the right of freedom of the press so as to ensure the spread of intellectual, and typically liberal, ideas among the citizens, just as was done in order to inspire the revolution. …show more content…
As Benjamin Franklin wrote, the press is able “to strike with the Iron in hot,” allowing news and new ideas to spread throughout the people. In the late 18th century, newspapers used “exchanges,” which was a system in which newspapers from different cities would exchange copies and use stories and news from other papers; therefore, no matter where someone lived, they were able to hear the same news and build a sense of small, yet significant, unity. Newspapers, as well as pamphlets, became more radical throughout this time, straying from their typical stories of European news to recounts of events in the colonies, such as the Boston Massacre or the Boston Tea Party. Along with the ability to report on events throughout the colonies as they occurred, the press could spread ideas and rekindle aggravation by returning to and building upon past issues; therefore, the press was not only creating the fire for the revolution but it was also able “to heat it by continual Striking.” As with Common Sense by Thomas Paine, pamphlets were able to incite a revolutionary fever amongst the common man. Throughout the revolution, the press not only grew in radicalism but also in volume, with “more than four hundred pamphlets published in the colonies on the imperial controversy up through 1776, and nearly four times that number by war’s end …show more content…
As James Madison, the author of the Bill of Rights, wrote in his Report on the Virginia Resolutions, “to the press alone, checkered as it is with abuses, the world is indebted for all the triumphs which have been gained by reason and humanity over error and oppression.” Along the same lines, the Continental Congress wrote in the Letter to the Inhabitants of Quebec that freedom of the press is one of the rights “without which people cannot be free and happy.” Both the men of the First Continental Congress and Madison himself agree that the press is the means by which to achieve freedom from
Final draft constitution DBQ Essay The constitution was made in 1787 by George Washington. They created the constitution to help our country, because it does not let any branch of government get too powerful. They created it by America's government and fundamental laws, and guaranteed certain basic rights for its citizens.
The Founding and the Constitution Describe the formal amendment process The Formal amendment process of the Constitution is broken down into two parts. The first part begins by proposing an amendment. Proposals are made by a representative in either the house or the senate.
How do you convince some newly independent citizens of the benefits of ratifying a constitution? According to Alexander Hamilton, through writing, and lots of it. In 1787, Hamilton, along with James Madison and John Jay, published a series of documents, addressing concerns the people might have about the Constitution drafted by the Congressional delegates. The Constitution was being sent to the states for ratification, but in New York, many were opposed to the ideas put forth. Hamilton, Madison, and Jay wrote eighty-five documents which would later be named The Federalist Papers, as they voiced the common opinion of the Federalist party, which was in favor of ratification.
Framing this new nation was an extreme procedure. There were a few unique thoughts. In the wake of understanding that the nation was excessively feeble under the Articles of Confederation. In result, there came another thought; which was to endorse the Constitution. The strategies for confirming the new Constitution were as questionable as its substance.
The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who
Gavin Rau Mr. Hawley Early U.S. History 7 April 2023 Ratify the New Constitution After the American colonies declared their independence, they adopted a constitution. It was called the Articles of confederation. The federal government did not make the Articles very powerful, and was failing. The people were in desperate need of a new constitution.
The Articles of Confederation, which were proposed and produced by John Dickinson and accepted as a governmental foundation plan by the Continental Congress in 1781 became Congress’ first effort to unify the newly founded country in economic and political strength through the use of a universal constitution for all of the states that stated the country’s liberty and gave certain rights to each individual state. During the early post-revolution era in America, states were advised by Congress to begin establishing state governments with written constitutions as a foundational structure in which there were almost no regulations or political structure. Many states began their constitutions by stating their “unalienable rights” which usually included the freedom of speech, religion, assembly, petition, the right to bear arms, and the right to equal protection under state
After convening together yesterday, I finally understood the true importance of my decision and of my votes; they will not only have a major impact on our present generation but on posterity as well. Therefore, I do not make this decision lightly, but given the current trajectory of our states and the future conflicts that might occur if we choose not to change, I strongly believe that ratifying the Constitution would be the best possible solution for our nation. For this reason, I am supporting and voting for John Adams, James Madison, and George Washington. John Adams convinced me that “unity, peace, and religious freedom” will prosper with the introduction of the Constitution; he persuasively argued that this unity will finally relieve the tensions between states. Because I strongly believe in peacemaking and in religious freedom, I am compelled to think that ratifying this new document would help to improve our nation greatly‒both
. Even if the American people had rejected the U.S. Constitution in 1787 and 1788, the ratification process would have forged a closer union. The debate over ratification, carried out in thirteen state conventions and in newspapers and pamphlets, was the first national public debate in America. The decision for independence had been made in closed session by Congress in 1776; Americans in the individual states and towns then decided to affirm it, but gradually. In contrast, the decision to ratify the Constitution was made in public conventions, and both supporters and opponents of ratification made their case with appeals to public opinion.
In 1787, as a debate over ratification of the Constitution evoke a lot of controversy, American citizens were advised not to rely on anyone’s opinions and to trust their own judgment. Additionally, Philadelphian Samuel Bryan published his first essay under the name “Centinel,” claiming that it would “not be difficult to prove” that only an authoritarianism could “bind so great a country under one government,” and that whatever structure men could formulate to oversee conclusively would develop into a dictatorship. The chosen officials of the government would be “devoid of all responsibility or accountability to the great body of the people, and that so far from being a regular balanced government, it would be in practice a permanent ARISTOCRACY.”
The original Constitution of 1788 contained very few specific restrictions on the ways in which the power of the national government could be exercised against the people. It guaranteed the right to trial by jury in criminal cases, placed limits on prosecutions and punishments for treason, forbade bills of attainder and ex post facto laws, limited any restrictions on habeas corpus to certain designated emergencies, and prohibited the granting of titles of nobility. But the Constitution that emerged from the 1787 Constitutional Convention contained nothing like a comprehensive bill of rights. Most state constitutions of the time had bills of rights, and many citizen, and members of the Constitutional Convention, expected the new national constitution to have one as well. The state delegations at the Constitutional Convention voted 10-0 against including a bill of rights in the Constitution.
The introduction of newspapers in the 17th century offered a new way of information flow. Especially politics and public affairs were popular subjects, so it is not surprising that censorship followed suit. Benjamin Harris published the first multi-page newspaper in the American colonies in 1690, called Publick Occurrences, Both Forreign and Domestick (Clark, 1991). Four days after the release the government ended the production by forbidding further publications (Clark, 1991). Newspapers can be powerful tools in difficult times.
The First Amendment was written because American citizens demanded a guarantee of their freedom. This led to James Madison writing the First Amendment. The First Amendment was established when the Founding Fathers wanted to guarantee that the Americans ' basic civil liberties would not be threatened by the government. The First Amendment was confirmed, along with nine other amendments,to the constitution of the United States. The First Amendment states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
The Constitution of the United States of America was written in 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Constitution is simply the different guidelines and expectations that the United States shall uphold and meet. The basic principles of the Constitution consist of six main points; popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, and federalism. These basic principles are laid out in order to demonstrate the values and ideals of our country. They do so through; clearly stating our ideals in the preamble, each separate clause being extremely organized, clearly laying out the part of the government which it is responsible for, and being immensely thorough in how it describes our country.
Based on what I have learned after reading the Preamble, as well as the first 7 articles of the Constitution. I believe the people have the most power in the constitution. There are many reasons to support my claim but I picked my three best details that supports my claim. My most important reason is the congress which is divided into two parts, the Senators and the house of representatives and they are chosen by the people. My second reason is that the Executive Branch is 100% answerable to the people because the whole country votes for him/her.