The colonials were upset because of ridiculous taxing, which imposed by the British government. The colonist’s response to the situation was boycotting the goods. And so the British government dispatched thousand of troops in Boston, which created a tension between the colonists and the military. On March 5, 1770, the British troops gathered at the custom house in order to protect it. There was a strong resentment in the crowd, as they harassed the troops. Someone in the regiment got panicked and started to fire back at the colonists. John Adams has described that the mob of Boston men were a bunch of angry and insolent men toward the troops.. Furthermore, the colonists was yelling, threatening and throwing everything they could find at the British soldiers …show more content…
According to the article, Preston has tried to avoid unnessesary conflict between the colonist and his troops. He wanted everyone to leave in peace. However, one of Preston’s soldier did not obey his command and started to fire at the mobs. As the result, Preston is responsible for death in the Boston Massacre. Preston’s indecisive actions have indirectly led to the uprising of Colonies. In my opinions, John Adams’s decision was right when he defended Thomas Preston and his soldiers. I would rather stay away from conflicts with the parliaments and British
Before the American Revolution, colonist fought in the French and Indian war or the 7 years war. After fighting the French the British expected them to pay their debts as they supported them during the French and Indian War. The colonist were not happy and say "no taxes without representation." often as an anti British Slogan. Later in 1770, the Boston Massacre happen but only 5 people was killed in the massacre they inflate the people who dies to spur up anti British sentiment.
Preston was standing behind his men when in reality he was indeed standing in front of them which really doesn't seem to fit. From the primary source from Captain Preston's recollection from the Boston Massacre stated that the colonist were throwing snowballs and attacking the soldiers with heavy clubs. In the miniseries
In the early 1760’s, the tension between the people in Boston and the British soldiers started to grow until in early 1770, when the two groups reached their breaking point. On March 5, 1770, a group of men started intimidating a British soldier; he soon called for assistance but eventually the crowd had grown to practically one hundred people. Captain Thomas Preston and seven other soldiers arrived, trying to calm the situation down, but to no avail. A soldier fired into the crowd followed by the other soldiers firing soon after, resulting in five people being killed. Captain Thomas Preston happened to be arrested and charged with murder.
The Boston Massacre The Boston Massacre was a riot a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. It was between The Colonists and some British soldiers. The Colonists were to blame for The Boston Massacre because they abused and confused British Soldiers. The Colonists were to blame for the Boston Massacre because they abused the soldiers. They abused the soldiers by throwing snowballs, and clubs at them.
So when Preston’s trial started in October of 1770, Adams argued that Preston had not given the order to fire and that his soldiers were provoked by the crowd. Eventually, the jury acquitted Preston on the basis of “reasonable doubt”- this was the first time a judge had ever used this term. John Adams played an important part in these trials and ultimately made the decisions that were the best for his people. It was important the Adams decided to send the British back to their country to help disconnect the two relationships. The Boston Massacre was significant on a few levels.
Reaction assumed revolutionary proportions in Boston, in the summer of 1768, when customs officials impounded a sloop owned by John Hancock, for violations of the trade regulations The Boston Massacre 1770 Colonists taunted and hurt Boson soldiers. The result in that is British soldiers retaleated in physical action. British soldiers fired into the crowd of colonists killing 5 of them. Colonists protested and go to court for this and loose.
Thomas Paine once stated, “The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.” During the late 1700’s the colonists were struggling with liberty from the British. They desired freedom, but feared failure. It was difficult since the colonists did not have a strong and experienced army like the British. Colonists had little motivation so that is when Paine felt the need to take action.
“The British are coming.” (Paul Revere) the reason the British were coming was to arrest, disarm and stop the rebels. The colonists were dissatisfied with the British rule and taxation without representation.
Was the Boston Massacre Really a Massacre? One of the most common things talked about in the history of the U.S.A. is the Boston Massacre, but was this historical event commonly looked at as a massacre really a massacre. I believe that the Boston Massacre was not a massacre at all instead it was just the act of self defense of a few british soldiers that were being attacked by upset colonists. One of the most said things about the Boston Massacre is that the british soldiers fired into a crowd of innocent people, but there is many pieces of proof that says otherwise.
In Lexington, the British were met with colonial armed forces known as minutemen. Here, eight colonists died. In concord, the two groups met again, but the minutemen left victorious. This event caused the beginning of the Revolutionary
The event was used by colonial leaders to rally support for the American Revolution and to undermine British authority. The Boston Massacre was also a factor in the passage of the Coercive Acts, which were a series of harsh laws imposed by the British government to punish the colonies for their role in the event. The Coercive Acts closed the port of Boston, restricted town meetings, and allowed British officials accused of crimes to be tried in England instead of in the colonies. These acts angered the colonists and led to increased tensions between the British soldiers and the colonists, ultimately leading to the events of the Boston Massacre. These acts were important in leading to this event happening.
Even when they were firing, townsfolk still attacked them back. After the smoke cleared and the firing stopped, nine colonists were dead and dying on the pavement. Colonists ran up to the stunned british and slammed them with slanderous, and insulting names. The soldiers retreated back to their quarters, for theirs and the crowds, safety and protection. What happens next is all commonly known to most people.
There were many disagreements and because of those, many events were the cause of the American Revolution. These events included bloodshed by others, peoples rights weren’t enforced, individuals didn’t receive freedom, and our country was just not yet whole. Despite of the causes of why the road to Revolution took place there were effects afterwards. When American Revolution was over with the The Declaration of Independence came into place, treaties were signed, and the Bill of Rights. Now these effects/events were amazing, it helped our country tremendously.
The riot began when about 50 citizens attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in additional soldiers, and they too were attacked, so the soldiers fired into the mob, killing 5. The Boston Tea Party began with the Tea Act that past in Boston. The law prevented the colonists from buying tea from other tea shops and that tea was more expensive than the others.
Intolerable Acts The Intolerable Acts can be viewed as one of the first sparks to the flaming fire of America claiming Independence. The Intolerable Acts, also called the Coercive Acts, were a series of laws passed in 1774 in order to punish the colonies for defying their rule. Four out of five of the Intolerable Acts were directed towards Massachusetts directly and the other was directed at Quebec. All of the Acts were supposed to stop the colonies from defying England’s Rule and show the colonies that England was still in charge.