France, a country of rich history, culture and beauty. Although France has not always been the poised country, its culture and public perception has shaped our perception of France into a world apart from our own. Outsiders sometimes seem to forget what France really was 300 years ago, but the story stays alive in the hearts of French natives. The “Reign Of Terror” is one of France’s most significant events because it corrupted Frances rights and shaped France into the strong nation it is today. Constant debate floats around in classrooms with the question “Is the “Reign Of Terror” justified?” I have formulated the opinion to believe that the Reign of Terror is not justified after analyzing seven documents. Some of my reasons as too why the …show more content…
A) These were thought as natural given rights, but to the “Committee of Public Safety” this was complete and utter nonsense. The right of security was exploited when Robespierre gave a speech to the National Convention stating that, “Social protection is due only peaceful citizens, there are no citizens in the Republic but the Republicans.” (Doc. G) This excerpt presents that Robespierre only cared about the people who were blindsided by his ludacris actions and really though revoking rights would bring France prosperity and balance. Article 10 in the “Declaration of the Rights of Man” states, “No one should be silenced on account of his opinions, including his religious views.” (Doc. A) In a letter written to the “National Convection” by a local government official in West France it states that crowds were forming and rioting in Vendee and the crowds did not seem to cease or downsize, even with the public troops involved. The letter states, “…The council meanwhile has taken strong measures, and at this moment there are three thousand national guardsmen in the region to establish order…six patriots have already fallen victim to this ramble, but at least forty of their number were killed.” (Doc. D) This statement exemplifies the detraction of the rights of man which allowed citizens to voice and protest their opinion publicly without the fear of being
I believe that WWII was indeed the last total war of the modern era. "Total war is a military conflict in which contenders are willing to make any sacrifice in lives and other resources to obtain a complete victory. " This was made obvious by numerous factors including Operation Meetinghouse or as many know it the firebombing of Tokyo. The United States unleashed a fury of which has never been seen before. Over 1,000,000 were made homeless and 100,000 civilians were killed in this raid.
Shays’ Rebellion Essay Shays’ Rebellion was when a group of farmers protested against the government shortly after America gained its independence. Although these farmers rebelled against the government, nevertheless they stood up, aimed to help country, and their actions had lasting effects affecting the government. These protesters stood up against the government. It is important to realize that “ the people who have stepped up to demand rights for themselves and others are most likely to be put in jail.” These jails they were put in were often far away from their homes.
Between the creation of the Constitution and the Civil War, there was a period of implementation . In this period the Bill of Rights were ratified. During the years that followed and before the Civil War, there were a variety of “constitutional” violations and interpretations. For example, we read of John Adams who created a military without a Congressional declaration of war.
The main goal for the “Reign of Terror” was to get rid of Frances enemies of the war that was happening and protect the country from foreign invaders. There was another name for the “Reign of Terror” it was “The Terror.” This happened during the “French Revolution” between the ninth month of later seventeen hundred and the seventh month of the later seventeenth hundred. The Government decided to make the “Terror” the order of the day on September fifth. This was against those suspected of being enemies or against them.
The Reign of Terror in France was not justified. This claim can be supported by looking at three areas: external threat, the internal threat, and the methods. The external threat was not enough to justify the Reign of Terror. One example of this is that “churches are soon closed by revolutionary government” which is wrong, because people should be able to choose what they believe in (Document A). Another example is that the “Government denies legal counsel to accused enemies of the revolution” (Document A).
The Reign of Terror was a climatic event of violence that insured the death of many people. The Reign of Terror was one of the most historical events during the French Revolution because it helped save France from invasion by other countries, and in that sense preserved the Revolution. During this time, there were many public executions and mass killings of suspects in September 1793 through July 1794. In total 300,00 people were arrested, 17,000 were executed, and 10,000 presumably died in prison. The Reign of Terror was also organized by the twelve-man committee of safety.
American Revolution began in 1775. There were lots of events, which led to the America revolution. Till 1763, everything was going in favor of England. Majority of the Americas were in favor of British rule, and they were big supporter. They use to treat parliament and queen of England with full respect.
If people used the old forms of address, “Madame”and “Monsieur,” instead of “citizen,” they were killed. If they did not seem enthusiastic enough about the revolution, they were executed . As if they hadn't done enough, the revolutionaries formed yet another group, the Committee of Public Safety, to rule France. The twelve men, including Robespierre, did everything in their power to prevent anyone from stopping the revolution, including the destruction of religion.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen is a document that spells out the rights of French citizens and restricts the role of the French monarchy. One way in which this document placed limits on the French monarchy is its assertion that the power of a state belongs solely with the people. To elaborate, the citizens of France believed it was important for the French state to be a democracy, not a autocracy or oligarchy. Another way the French monarchy was limited by this particular document was its proclamation that no French citizen may be punished by the government for voicing their opinions about any matter. This means that the monarchy cannot, for any reason, stop someone from denouncing the government.
Was the Reign of Terror justified? The Reign of Terror was one of the worst times in world history. This was a period of time when thousands of people were being executed for unfair reasons because of Robespierre- an absolute monarch who believed that torture and terror were required to have a strong constitutional law. The reign of terror was not justified because Enlightenment ideas were ignored, the rights of the common people were violated, and the methods of punishment were too harsh.
Further expressed in paragraph 3, “Nor can you find a word in any of the grand documents left us by the fathers that assumes for government the power to create or to confer rights.”. This is used to imply that through time the government has changed the basic rights given to everyone by the founding fathers despite not being meant to be altered. In Emmenline Pankhurst’s speech “Freedom or Death”, allusion is used to provide reasoning upon why women should have the right to vote. This is done through the use of allusion to the civil war as a soldier, as well as through the use of metaphors.
The Reign of Terror did not support the ideals of the revolution. Unfortunately for French citizens, they were not able to elect tribunal members. The tribunal members, who have absolute power were “appointed by the National Convention” (Document E). French people were rejected in their own country, which is proven by the statement that “conspirators are, in its eyes, only strangers”(Document G). The original ideals were made to protect the people of France but instead they were killing
Was The Reign Of Terror Justified? The French Revolution was a very problematic time period. After the execution of Louis XVI, the Reign of Terror began during the years of 1793 - 1794 which was led by French politician, Maximilien Robespierre and lasted for 18 months. This topic is controversial when the question, “Was the Reign of Terror justified?” is asked.
Is it possible for people to be free when they're getting killed before they do. The Reign of Terror lasted less than two years,from the execution of Louis XVI in 1793 to late 1794. During those eighteen months, more than 20,000 French people died from being cut by the guillotine. The question is if the actions of the french government for the span of 18 months were justified or not justified. The reign of terror was not justified.
Was the French Revolution preventable? This is a question that is fascinating to think about. What could have been done differently to prevent this revolution that cost countless people their lives? Why were others willing to give their lives, for what cause? Why was life so turbulent?