The development of the French Revolution mirrors the development of egalitarian freedom over oppressive ideals, only emphasised through changed’ government systems; what began as a fight for equality, soon disfigured to radicalised egalitarianism and oppressive tyranny. Initially, a progressive society based on an obsolete government, the French Revolution epitomises the power of the people and the arbitrariness of revolution, echoed through the changes of governance systems. The impetus of the Revolution - socio-political and economic inequity against the bourgeoisie and proletariat, established the foundations of the revolution, its’ importance accentuated in the source below. The immensity of political unrest in France dominantly influenced …show more content…
Birthed from a multitude of causes including the execution of the king, the momentum and arbitrariness of the Revolution, and fear of counter-revolution, Terror itself, became synonymous with the Revolution. Questioning of the Terror thus was equivalent to questioning the Revolution- a crime which carried life sanctions. The Reign of Terror’s pervasive and tyrannic movement infiltrated the nation and claimed over 50,000 lives of conceived counter-revolutionaries, inclusive of Source B’s orator, Antoine Barnavare. Jean Paul-Marat’s emotive speech reinstates the New Order “crush us in the name of justice, they load us with irons in the name of liberty”, perpetuating the development of the Revolution from moral to tyrannical. With the guidance of both Source A and Source B, the first having addressed feudal and monarchical injustices’ committed against the people, and the second- the people's retaliation, to growing extremes, the development of the French Revolution can be traced efficaciously. The Reign of Terrors procession additionally reverberates’ the arbitrariness of Revolution without order, and the anarchic momentum it proceeds with. As the sensationalised revolution became at once the object of equality, but also the agent of its’ destruction, it essentially “had begun to turn on itself”, resulting in an ascension of political unrest, once again. The development of the Revolution, at the Reign of Terror, rehabilitates the first stage with the reinforcement of monarchical government power and order as opposed to people power, however, holds’ democracy and equality with greater
The French Revolution was a drastic time for the people of France. In 1789, the majority of people were living in poverty and dealing with terrible conditions. People were split into three estates: the first, second, and third, the first being the wealthiest. Political, economic, and social situations were what contributed to people’s desire for change. The three main, or biggest causes of the French Revolution, were taxes, inequality, and lack of reform.
The Reign of Terror opened the door for the government of France to secure military victories with thus decreased the amount of stress on the government. In Documents B and C, they both illustrate how actions taking by the Committee of Public Safety, the leading Terror body, helped lead to France to victory against foreign enemies. Document B gives us a timeline of the events leading up to the Reign of Terror and we can see how the actions taken by the Committee of Public Safety, such as the Levee en Masse, helped bring about French Victory. We can also see how Document C supports this deduction from Document B as Document C talks about the effect of the revolution and the Reign on the outside threat to France. We can also deduce from Document
The Reign of Terror lasted a year over the span of 1793 to 1794. Throughout this year, many people died because the National Assembly deemed it necessary in order to control the people in which they governed. If one were not following the ideals of the revolution, they were killed. Was the Reign of Terror justified? The Reign of Terror was not justified through the external and internal threats the people faced, the unreasonable methods of terror, and the ideals that the revolution followed.
The Reign of Terror was very violent event that took place; although, people made it out to be helpful and resolve multiple issues it resulted in making many people very miserable and sad. This act that took place was not justified because the leader was self elected and not giving people the right to vote for their leader. Another example of this was people´s hopes were manipulated and misguided leading up to violence. The Reign of Terror was the third class (bourgeoisie) had started a war with the first class because they did not treat them well. The Bourgeoisie killed many of the first and second estate.
The Reign of Terror in France was not justified. This claim can be supported by looking at three areas: external threat, the internal threat, and the methods. The external threat was not enough to justify the Reign of Terror. One example of this is that “churches are soon closed by revolutionary government” which is wrong, because people should be able to choose what they believe in (Document A). Another example is that the “Government denies legal counsel to accused enemies of the revolution” (Document A).
The Reign of Terror did not support the ideals of the revolution. Unfortunately for French citizens, they were not able to elect tribunal members. The tribunal members, who have absolute power were “appointed by the National Convention” (Document E). French people were rejected in their own country, which is proven by the statement that “conspirators are, in its eyes, only strangers”(Document G). The original ideals were made to protect the people of France but instead they were killing
Was The Reign Of Terror Justified? The French Revolution was a very problematic time period. After the execution of Louis XVI, the Reign of Terror began during the years of 1793 - 1794 which was led by French politician, Maximilien Robespierre and lasted for 18 months. This topic is controversial when the question, “Was the Reign of Terror justified?” is asked.
Revolutions were a common occurrence in many parts of the world. The 17th century was miserable. Between 1790 and 1848 many different people in Europe, Central America, the Caribbean, and other areas of the world struggled to gain freedom and independence from oppressive and dictatorial regimes. While the the French and Haitian Revolutions, inspired by the American Revolution, were alike in many areas such as social class struggles, economic inequities, and personal freedoms. In spite of their similarities the revolutions in France and Haiti were more different than similar because pitted While France struggled with it’s
The use of terror during the French Revolution, from the years 1793 to 1794, marked a period in which the revolution moved to political extremes. Exactly when the Reign of Terror began is still a matter of historical debate. Some historians trace the Reign of Terror to the execution of King Louis XVI in January of 1793, while some tie it to the establishment of the Revolutionary Tribunal in March of 1793, or the forced removal of the Girondinists from the National Convention in June of 1793. Still other historians believe the murder of Jean-Paul Marat by a Girondin in July of 1793 was the key incident. While all of these events strongly influenced the use of terror, if the Reign of Terror could be traced to a defining moment, it might be
The French people’s knowledge of their rights led them to believe that it is possible to achieve fairness and be respected in their own province. And lastly, the idea of questioning France’s government had peasants discover that their king barely even cared about their well-being and restricted them of representation.
Jean-Paul Marat was one of the biggest advocates for the French Revolution and its violent techniques. He was one of the most influential and inspiring radicals, known for his progressive publications in the newspaper, being one of the leaders of the Reign of Terror and a huge contributor to the executions of many. Through examining his life and work, we can gain a deeper understanding of arguably one of the most influential and scheming individuals of all time. This biographical narrative will explore the life of Jean-Paul Marat, from his young life and early career, to his legacy and all of his impact on the French Revolution. Jean-Paul Marat’s early life is partially what influenced how he was during the Revolution.
The Reign of Terror began in 1793 and ended in July of 1794. There was a total of 14,000 people executed by use of the guillotine, firing squad, and other methods. During this time period, the country of France was in total and constant chaos; they were being attacked by Prussian and Austrian troops, and their economy was a disaster. Utilizing terror as an instrument of the French Revolution had the advantages of making the people of France brave in any moment of action, but the number of deaths, the economic decline, and the fact that innocent people were killed made the large amount of disadvantages of the technique outweighs the
The Reign of Terror was important because it brought the downfall of absolute monarchy in France. Thousands of people, including King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, were executed by guillotine. Anyone who tried to oppose the revolution were imprisoned immediately and then executed without trial. The majority of those killed were of the First and Second Estate. The leader of the Reign of Terror was Maximilien Robespierre, an active spokesperson for the rights of people and the principle of equality.
Jean-Paul Marat was a critical figure in the French Revolution. A physician by trade, he took on prominence through his writings on the conflict in France. His aggressive and violent views influenced the Revolution as it became more radical. Marat’s place in history was cemented by his dramatic assassination that was later portrayed in a famous painting. Within this paper, Marat’s life will be reviewed and his influence on the Revolution examined.
The Reign of Terror was a bloody and important event during the French Revolution. There was several leaders such as Georges Danton, who was a prominent lawyer and became one of the orator during this period of time. This research paper will be go deeply into Georges Danton’s political views and evolution. He was involved politically with the Cordeliers Clubs and was a member of the Committee of public Safety. The thesis of my research paper is: Danton, the leader during the Reign of Terror, who wants to help the population.