“A Doll’s House” Essay Throughout history, society always has specific morals and assumptions of their times of which can be displayed in many different ways. Often seen today, those morals are expressed through literature, such as with how characters are acting in their society or around other characters. Furthermore, the alienation of some characters can also reveal society’s specific morals at the time in which the story is taking place. In Henrik Ibsen’s “A Doll’s House,” the alienation of the characters Nora Helmer, Christine Linde, and Nils Krogstad reveal society’s morals and assumptions that men are superior to women in that time period. Society’s morals and assumptions that men are superior to women in the time period of “A …show more content…
She had to “ . . . provide for [her] two younger brothers . . .” and attempt to take care of her sick mother for a period of time (Ibsen 8). In this time, the men usually provided for the women, so a woman providing for her family and keeping them afloat was considered different. Due to how society viewed this, she was practically forced to marry a man of whom she did not love because he had money and could provide more for her family than she could as a woman. In her conversation with Nils Krogstad, Christine explains that “ . . . a woman who has sold herself for another’s sake [does not] do it a second time” (Ibsen 54). This expresses that she has already sold herself to a man, her late husband, for her family’s sake, and that if she is going to rekindle her relationship with him, it is going to be in the right way and because they love each other, not because she supposedly needs a man in her life. In the soon to be new relationship between Christine and Krogstad, Christine will be more of the “man” of it due to the fact that she will be the one with a higher paying job at the bank. When she is asked as to why she won’t just give the job to him, she says that “ . . . [they] could not wait for [him]; [his] prospect seemed helpless . . . ” (Ibsen 54). This shows that even the bank had decided that a woman was better to take over the job than to wait for …show more content…
While explaining things to Nora in her house, he says that “[he] wants to rehabilitate [himself] . . . [he] wants to get on . . . [and] for the last year and a half, [he] has not had a hand in anything dishonorable, and all that time [he] has been struggling in [the] most restricted circumstances” (Ibsen 44). Krogstad is basically being treated like a woman in the situation. He has worked hard according to himself but is now being removed and getting in trouble for something that could be avoided. He made a mistake and is being punished for it, and even a woman is taking his place at the bank. Krogstad’s action of forging a signature versus Nora’s doing of it also receives completely different reactions. With Nora, Torvald decides to eventually say that “ . . . [he] is man enough to take everything upon [himself]” (Ibsen 36). With Krogstad being fired for it, and Nora receiving no punishment whatsoever, it shows that men believe women need to be taken care of. Christine is the one who helps Krogstad change his point of view of everything occurring in the story, so she is taking care of his problems like Torvald supposedly intended to do for Nora. Christine is the one who takes charge in the startup of their rekindled relationship by saying that “[they] have a great deal to talk about [first]” and that things were going to
One of the greatest things about history is that you can look back on it and see all the changes and events that has brought us here where we are today. One change in history that is still evolving even today would be the role of women. In the play, A Doll’s House, the protagonists known as Nora, and her friend Mrs. Linde, lead a role on how women were treated and expected to behave during the era the play was created. The ideal image of a woman in the past would not fit with the ideal image of a woman in today’s modern society (at least in some countries). Even though A Doll’s House dates back to the year 1879, it is still relevant in the society we live in today.
A Doll’s house, a play written by Henrik Ibsen was an interesting read and practically a glimpse of how women were treated in the 19th century. Ibsen’s inner nature was strongly in conflict with the role the 19th-century woman was called on to perform in the society (Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia). The daily life of women in the 19th century was that of many obligations and fewer choices, women were always being controlled by men first by their father, brother, uncle and then their husbands. For instance, Father’s would not educate their daughters or they would rather get a special kind of education such as those in sewing, catering or housekeeping to prepare them as “Angels in the house” with the sole idea that they would eventually become
Therefore Torvald’s pride left Nora with no choice but to borrow from Krogstad and
A Doll’s house is a realistic three act play that focuses on the nineteenth century life in middle class Scandinavian household life, where the wife is expected to be inferior and passive whereas the husband is superior and paternally protective. It was written by Henrik Ibsen. The play criticised the marriage norms that existed in the 19th century. It aroused many controversies as it concludes with Nora, the main protagonists leaving her husband and children in order to discover her identity. It created a lot of controversies and was heavily criticised as it questioned the traditional roles of men and women among Europeans who believed that the covenant of marriage was holy.
At the beginning of their marriage Nora did everything on her power to save his husband health including going against her husband beliefs by lying about how she obtained a large amount of money (money that she told her husband that was borrowed from her father and not by doing business with Krogstad) Nora told Mrs. Linde that she has been using her allowance to pay the debt. She was looking forward to New Year, because she will have paid off her debt completely and then will be “free” to fulfill her responsibilities as a wife and mother without impediment. At this point we can notice the fact that Nora doesn’t feel “free” and realizes in her wife and mother
In Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House, the three-act play, set in 19th century Norway, explores the progress of Nora’s marriage as she attempts to hide her debt and forgery from her husband. Ibsen conveyed social commentary on gender roles and societal expectations, a topic still in controversy, through the use of symbolism, irony, and dramatic elements. In A Doll’s House, Ibsen presents the problems associated with the position of women in a man’s world of business as his central focus, even if other social or individual problems become more prominent as the play progresses.
“A Doll’s House” In Ibsen’s “A Doll’s House”, the author reveals the characterizations of Nora, Anne-Marie and Mrs. Linde in relating to women in nowadays societies, the women can be so childish, and some do not govern their own lives due to the lack of legal entitlement and independence and seeks the needs of truth to set others free. Nora or Mrs. Helmer is the protagonist of the play and the wife of Torvald Helmer.
This leads to Othello trusting the word of Iago, and ultimately leads to misconstrued meanings about the handkerchief falling into Cassio’s hands and the complete mistrust of Desdemona by Othello. In “A Doll’s House” Krogstad ends up writing a letter to Torvald about How his wife forged her father’s signature on a loan agreement and how if he didn’t rehire him with a promotion he was going to come forward with that information and ruin both Torvald and Nora’s reputations. It is during Torvald’s rant to Nora, that he blames her for her previous actions that will cause his ruin that Nora realizes that she is nothing more to him than a bird in a cage to be looked at or a doll to play
Ibsen’s play A Doll 's House, written in 1879, examines the importance of social class and the expectations that follow. A Doll’s House tells the story of married couple, Torvald and Nora Helmer who strive to fulfill social expectation. However, the ending is known to be a shock for some, as roles reverse and Nora comes to realize that she has been mistreated like a doll throughout the whole marriage. Throughout A Dolls House by Henrik Ibsen, doll 's and the dolls house are symbolic of how Nora is a submissive wife controlled and dominated by Torvald, and both are repressed by societal standards.
Both Krogstad and Nora, man and woman, would confront the impending and equal ramifications of their actions. In the eyes of the law, gender does not matter. Torvald, Nora’s spouse symbolizes the values of society. He is shown to accept the roles given in that patriarchal society while denying himself his own perception. Through Torvald, society bashes both Nora and Krogstad for their attempts to be free from the grasp of society and become their own individual.
The play begins with Nora being portrayed as a self-indulgent and whimsical woman with childlike qualities. After the porter asks Nora for “a shilling”, (Ibsen, p.23) she tips him over-generously with a pound, directing him to “keep it,” (p.23) giving the audience the impression that Nora does not know the value of money, much like a child would not. Her immature extravagance is recognized through her desire to spend Torvald’s higher salary right away, even though it will not be received for another three months. His
Krogstad knowing now of the fabrication, extorts Nora on the condition that on the off chance that she doesn't convince Torvald to not fire him, Krogstad would tell Torvald and every other person that she fashioned that mark; in which case it would have legal consequences for Nora. However most huge to Nora, knowing Torvald's severe dislike towards deceptive nature and obligation is her dread of demolishing her family's picture. The disclosure of this mystery to the group of onlookers totally changes the view of who Nora genuinely is, or possibly leaves the gathering of people in a condition of flitting perplexity without knowing how to mark
In 1880s, women in America were trapped by their family because of the culture that they were living in. They loved their family and husband, but meanwhile, they had hard time suffering in same patterns that women in United States always had. With their limited rights, women hoped liberation from their family because they were entirely complaisant to their husband. Therefore, women were in conflicting directions by two compelling forces, their responsibility and pressure. In A Doll’s House, Ibsen uses metaphors of a doll’s house and irony conversation between Nora and Torvald to emphasize reality versus appearance in order to convey that the Victorian Era women were discriminated because of gender and forced to make irrational decision by inequity society.
Throughout Denmark during the late nineteenth-century, the typical marriage was represented with the male dominance because women were looked down upon with no rights or thoughts for themselves. Torvald, the father figure in the play, represents the male dominant figure during the nineteenth-century. Throughout the play, the patriarchal symbolism that Ibsen emphasizes throughout the marriage of Nora and Torvald gives the reader a better understanding as to why Ibsen would put certain symbols to represent a typical marriage. In A Doll’s House, Henrik Ibsen portrays male-controlled symbolism throughout the play in order to emphasize the standard family structure of the late nineteenth-century. A Doll 's House is a play in the eyes of social
As Krogstad and Torvald are both driven by fear of unfavorable public opinion. Nora says “A barrister’s profession is such an uncertain thing, especially if he won’t undertake unsavoury cases; and naturally Torvald has never been willing to do that”. She says this because Torvald’s dedication to obeying the law stem from personal integrity and a fear of what other people might think. Or Krogstad clearly mentions his respect in “My sons are growing up for their sake I must try and win back as much respect as I can in the town, This post in the Bank was like the first step up for me – and now your husband is going to kick me downstairs again into the mud.” Regaining his good name is Krogstad’s major motivating force throughout the entire play.