The People against Robert Jefferson Burglary in the Third Degree, January 27, 1905 During the beginning of the twentieth century, Americans wanted change. The Progressive era was a time where people became more socially involved. Ending corruption in government was the most important part of the movement. Progressivism was an approach by the American people to reform local government, industry, churches and much more. Instead of living by the laws of the last century, this progress was beneficial to society as a whole. Crime at the turn of the century was also a concern, especially in urban communities. In this paper, I will discuss the 1905 jury trial of Robert Jefferson who was tried and convicted for the crime of Burglary in the Third Degree. On Monday, January 23, 1905, Mary F. Lake reported a burglary …show more content…
O’Connor, Prosecutor for the People, argued that the defendant, Robert Jefferson was guilty of Burglary in the Third Degree. Mr. O’Connor argued that there was an eye witness who could place Jefferson at the crime scene. Mr. O’Connor called Arthur Cooper to the stand for questioning. “Q. Now, will you just state what you did, when you got up to the apartment, and who you saw there, if anybody? A. Yes, I will. Q. Please do. A. When I got up there, the door was on a jar, and I rapped, and that young fellow there, he came to the door (indicating the defendant) (The People against Robert Jefferson 1905, 10). After being arrested, Jefferson implicated himself at the police station. Mr. O’Connor called Officer Joseph S. Davis to the stand for questioning. “Q. Now, what was it the defendant said, in the Station House, to you and O’Connor? A. I told the defendant, “You might as well tell us where those goods are. We have got a man who saw you in the flat,” and he said, “Well, if that man identifies me I’ll tell you where the goods is.” And I says, “All right. He will identify you” (The People against Robert Jefferson 1905,
The court cases of Manson, Leopold and Loeb, and Bukharin were utilized by the main defendants to provide commentary on certain aspects of their respective societies. Darrow’s closing argument focused on the plight of wealthy teenagers, the course materials introduced in the educational system, the historical progress made regarding the death penalty, and the impact that sentencing Leopold and Loeb to die would have on society. Manson’s testimony focused on the American jail system, President Nixon and the average person’s role in the Vietnam war and society’s outsiders. Bukharin’s last plea primarily focused on how the Show Trials will look to future generations and future societies. By analyzing the cases, comparing and contrasting them with
In the state of Florida burglary is defined as a first degree, second degree or third felony. In the state of Florida burglary can occur in a dwelling, structure or conveyance. The statute does not distinguish between dwellings and other structures. They are all included in the statute. Burglary in the state of Florida includes all dwelling and structures including permanent or temporary.
The Progressive Era took place in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, it marked and transformed the United States as well as its government. Many groups were an important part of the process that helped this transformation occur. New concepts of government and changes were made based on those notions. Political reforms took place in every aspect of the government. Roosevelt set the pace for progressive reform at the federal level.
Introduction The period of the trial was the 1910, more specifically the trial started on May 13, 1910 (pg.1). During the 1910 America was still developing into a world power, and many immigrants from other countries where attracted to t he prosperity that was available in America (Baily, S. L., 1983, pg.281). New York State specifically was one of the fastest growing states in the country with one of the best economical prosperity for native workers, and immigrants (Baily, S. L., 1983, pg.281). What is the crime in the trial?
In the late nineteenth century in America, crime became a big problem in urban societies. These crimes consisted of prostitution, assault, pickpocketing, murder, counterfeiting, grafting and much more. Timothy Gilfoyle claimed that crime in industrial cities was directly connected with those who have a lower social status and could not maintain a secure and stable life. After reading many primary and secondary sources from Gilfoyles book The Urban Underworld in Late Nineteenth-Century New York: The Autobiography of George Appo, I have come to agree with his statement. Although crime was and will never be acceptable, it was justifiable during this time.
OJ Simpson was a very achieved person player until he made one big mistake. The trial of OJ Simpson was a long stressful process to prove a star innocent or guilty of murder. This took Place in the state of California on October 3, 1995. OJ was tried for a murder crime of his ex-wife and another man. In the end OJ turned out to be not guilty of this crime.
Leo Frank was a white, Jewish, superintendent of a pencil factory in Atlanta, Georgia where the body of Mary Phagan, one of the factories’ workers, was found. The murder of the thirteen year old girl prompted outrage in the city of Atlanta and around the country, and in a highly controversial trail, Leo Frank was quickly given the death sentence. Frank’s sentence would later be changed to life in prison, but while he was in a jail hospital, a mob broke in and lynched Frank on the outskirts of Mary Phagan’s hometown. The trial of Leo Frank is unique in both its ability to spark controversy up to the present day, and its ability to highlight the social tensions of America and Atlanta, one of the countries busiest cities. With a new progressive
Title of Report: The way Burglary Laws can and have changed in Alabama Introduction: The crime of burglary might sound like something out of a crime movie or show, but it can be a real problem in places like Alabama. Now we can start talking about this topic and find and uncover the origins of these kind of laws, What they mean to everyday people today, and how they could change and transform in the years to come. Where It All Began
The Progressive Era was a time of far reaching social activism and political change over the United States, from the 1890s to 1920s. The primary goal of the Progressive development was dispensing with defilement in government. The development essentially focused on political machines and their supervisors. By bringing down these degenerate delegates in office a further method for direct vote based system would be set up. They likewise looked for direction of restraining infrastructures (Trust Busting) and organizations through antitrust laws.
The OJ Simpson murder case was a criminal trial held at the Los Angeles County Superior Court, in which former NFL player OJ Simpson was tried on two counts of murder for the death of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend, Ron Goldman. He was found not guilty even though there were numerous counts of evidence that showed that OJ was the one who killed his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and Ron Goldman. OJ Simpson should have been guilty of murdering Nicole because there was DNA evidence, he had dreams of killing Nicole Simpson, and jealousy could have been the motive that led him to kill Nicole. There was blood found at the crime scene that traced back to OJ’s DNA. Marcia Clark, the lead prosecutor of the murder case, revealed that a blood drop found near the bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman has been linked to OJ Simpson through RFLP testing - the highest level of DNA examination, commonly known as a genetic fingerprint.
“Former American football star and actor O.J. Simpson was famously acquitted for the murders of his ex-wife and her friend following a high-profile 1995 criminal trial” (biography.com editors).O.J. Simpson began his fame playing football at the high school level. His high school team name was the Galileo Lions. Located in San Francisco. Then later in his life he was charged with the murder of his ex-wife and her friend. He eventually went to trial.
Members of the jury, Today Sean and I will be representing the prosecution .We will be providing information, and evidence against Paul Dickson proving that he murdered Jim Kendall. Throughout the case you will hear testimonies from close friends,family,experts in their field and the accused that will show that Jim Kendall 's death was not an accident ,but instead a cold hearted premeditated murder. Paul Dickson, who was madly in love with Julie Gregg, committed the murder after finding out Jim Kendall had played a joke on Julie. At the conclusion of the case, the facts will prove beyond doubt that Paul is Guilty and should be charged with 1st degree premeditated murder.
The people’s sympathy and concern for this young man’s life was the main goal in this murder trial. When he convinces the other jurors to talk it over for another hour, Juror eight also exemplifies the foot-in-the-door approach. In additional to the above tactics, he
(1916). The Causes and Cures of Criminality. Plenum Press. Koonce, A. (Ed.). (2012, November 27).