“Forbid us something, and that thing we desire; but press it on us hard, and we will flee”-Geoffrey Chaucer. The Reeve’s Tale by Chaucer is mainly constructed of instrumentality, and feminist theory. What is perceived from the text is the theme of revenge, and retaliation, as well as the usage of violability, phallocentric theory, and feminists’ criticism to further the tension because of the emphasis on the students, and how they differ from the family as well as the Miller. The students for example, differ from the family due to their wealth of knowledge, and their experience. Experiences such as, being on their own, making decisions, and becoming something other than students. Chaucer also uses phallocentric focus throughout the poem to keep it as deeply entrenched as its genre--entertaining and strong topics. In this poem, subjectivity is mainly focused on the women, and how they are subjective to the will of the men. We get Symkin’s feelings and thoughts about certain things and how he finds that the students aren’t smart enough to outsmart him, and we also get Alayn and John’s thoughts and feelings all throughout the story. What we don’t get is the women’s thoughts and feelings. The only time we hear Malenye’s voice is when she betrays her dad to Alayn, and due to the women who are so undermined in …show more content…
The tension rose from the beginning to the end, until the finale where the students achieved their goal of getting what was stole from them and others, and the ultimate theme of revenge and retaliation flows throughout the story as easily as the theme of assault. The students both wanted to avenge the wrongdoings that they faced, as well as the many others from the selfishness of the Miller. In the way of achieving this not only did they rape Malenye, but they also required the goods that they wanted and the virginity and manipulation of the Miller’s
Hoopla Cliques production of ‘Chores’ entertained and influenced young audiences as they followed the life of two teenage boys Patty and Jules. By Completing their chore of cleaning their room Patty and Jules could continue doing the things they love. By Successfully utilising conventions of clowning and manipulating tension the production was easily able to communicate the dramatic meaning, when hard work is achieved, you can have the fun you dreamt of. Conventions of clowning where accurately manipulated throughout the piece to convey a storyline that kept the audience’s attention. One of these convention was the use of slapstick.
Through story actions, chaucer emphasized that dreams are nonfictional things, when he made Cock Chaunticleer dream became true, when Don Russel appeared and attempt preying him, this action is not artificial or coincidentally, Chaucer made this action to show up Hen lady Pretelote totally have no idea and have an ignorance about dreams specifically and life issues in general, and this what the reader wanted to read in that time. which mean in another way that even though women knew more about courage than men, they still have some ignorance in what is related to courage and sometimes, they won't know that courage is to be afraid in some situations, fear is a basic element that would give a person a push to do things that he was afraid from doing it, or things he needed some fear to do it.
Author Stewart Justman discusses the honor of the three male characters in his essay, “The Reeve’s Tale and the Honor of Men.” This analysis appears to evolve from the insult the pilgrim Reeve receives after The Miller’s Tale, causing, “…males whose obsession with their own repute, and corresponding dread of derision, reduce the ‘noble’ value of honor to an absurd and violent mania” (21). This leaves Malyne and Symkyn’s wife the recipients of this violence. One might say that Justman continues with the previous essays by Plummer and Woods even though they discuss money, honor is closely related to the overall shaming of Symkyn after his daughter and wife are sexually assaulted. It is power, greed, and pride that, “…the result that women are
Shakespeare explores this regard for honor and its implications through a comedic lens in Much Ado About Nothing. He emphasizes the importance of maiden chastity in the plight of Hero, who is disgraced after accusations of a premarital affair. One’s sense of honor held notable significance in his era, but society is always evolving,
Over time, Henryson’s clear narrative to morality connection has become less common. Taking the Nun’s Priest’s Tale from The Canterbury Tales by way of example, the fable form, which Chaucer parodies, is distorted, destabilising the connection between story and morality. Crucially, the Nun’s Priest’s Tale is the same moral fable told in Henryson’s The cock and the Fox, meaning a comparative analysis of the distinct methodologies used are all the more intriguing. Through Chaucer’s constructing of complex subjectivity (Narkiss, 56) he disconnects the morality communicated at the conclusion of the tale from the story that preceded it.
The diction of the play helps to advance the plot and the theme of this play immensely. The word choice between the genders is different; the women sound more educated whenever the men aren’t around. This goes to show that women were only expected to speak if they didn’t sound nearly as intelligent as the men did. Glaspells use of this gives the reader the impression that the women don’t even want to be speaking properly, for fear of rebuke from their spouse. The author’s use of diction helps us to understand the women and their importance in the society at the time.
Each tale reveals moral lessons that attempt to prevent the reader from performing the same mistakes as the character. “The Pardoner’s Tale” and “The Reeve’s Tale” possess similar themes, distinct differences arise in the topics presented in each passage. “The Pardoner’s Tale” and “The Reeve’s Tale” illustrates how greed corrupts men, how sin leads to more sin, and how revenge drives men to undertake foolish feats. The differences between Chaucer’s tales allows for a humorous yet insightful
By utilizing greed, Chaucer illustrates the development of the rioters from brothers to the two men turning on the other and vise
He also utilized fabliaux to fill his stories with multiple sexual accounts that poke fun at the rules of courtly love. Chaucer’s humor had three main components – mockery, irony, and sadism. John, an older carpenter, with a young wife, is at the center of “The Miller’s Tale.” Chaucer mocks John for marrying a younger woman and the fact that their relationship does not follow the rules of courtly love. Courtly love suggests that jealousy strengthens relationships and equates to love.
Throughout The Canterbury Tales, Chaucer illustrates to the reader the true characteristics of the Miller and the Reeve by using the aspect of morality to show their related views on love and women. Love, to both the Miller and the Reeve, is frequently associated with beauty, lust, and sexual intercourse. Their vision of love is consistent in both stories; indicating that they care mostly about the women’s physical appearances. This can be easily seen in the stories by the way that the women are described and portrayed. Neither of Chaucer’s story tellers offer much insight into the women’s intelligence or mental characteristics.
The rigid class system in Middle Age Europe was a primary factor that determined the course of events. In Shakespeare's Twelfth Night, there are underlying issues throughout the plot involving classes of the characters, and their roles within their class. While for the time period, it was common for those in lower classes to be looked down upon, Shakespeare uses many mediums to slyly challenge this idea. Throughout the play, Shakespeare makes the class differences obvious, yet creates certain character dynamics which challenge preconceptions. Twelfth Night is centered around a distinct and rigid class system, yet Shakespeare comments on its negative impacts, and yearns for a more fluid system, in order to create a more just and fair world.
For Shakespeare’s plays to contain enduring ideas, it must illustrate concepts that still remain relevant today, in modern society. Shakespeare utilises his tragic play Othello, to make an important social commentary on the common gender stereotypes. During early modern England, Shakespeare had to comply to the strict social expectations where women were viewed as tools, platonic and mellow, and where men were displayed as masculine, powerful, tempered, violent and manipulative. As distinct as this context is to the 21st century, the play exposes how women were victimised by the men who hold primary power in the community in which they compelled women to conform to the ideal world of a perfect wife or confront an appalling destiny for challenging the system. Moreover, Shakespeare utilises the main antagonist, Iago, to portray how men are desperate to achieve what they want and to indirectly fulfil the stereotype of masculinity and power through manipulation.
Human beings could be really good or really bad persons; “they were either Fortune’s favorites, or Fortune’s victim, they were either brilliantly happy or bowed down in black despair.” Therefore, it was very important for those who knew how to read to help society learn how to behave. At that time, Chaucer was the great poet who was concerned about the human beings, religion, and moral life. His poems emerge as poems of love, both earthly and divine, and a desire of a spiritual union with God.
So does David Wallace: “the most significant witness to the Decameron’s influence in England is Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. ”(Wallace,6). Wallace’s statement, that the radical difference between Boccaccio and Chaucer is‘‘Chaucer’s decision to bring his female protagonist to prominence’’,(Wallace,17)identifies the single most important change from a tale in which the Rash Promise and its female giver exist only as motivators of fantasy and the game question, ‘‘which man demonstrates the greater generosity’’. However, the change is much more than simply giving Dorigen prominence, because in Boccaccio’s versions there was no comparable female persona. The personages of the comedie humaine, expose the attitude that comes along with each tale in the prefaces,which appends an excessively forceful frame narrative to the book.
Society’s superficial viewing of women is also reflected in the poem’s wring, as it may seem that this poem is strictly concerned with a prostitute, but in fact it describes all females. The male representative in the poem, Georges, then asserts his superiority, despite their similar conditions of being poor. Although he is sexually attracted to her as he “stiffens for [her] warmth”, suggesting an erection, he is unwilling to accept her as a human being as he deems her question “Why do you do this?”