The historical no fiction book written by Robert M. Edsel and Bret Witter, The Monuments Men: Allied Heroes, Nazi Thieves, and the Greatest Treasure Hunt in History, is a true-based story about World War 2 that most Americans have unheard of. This story captures the formation of an allied unit of soldiers, the Monuments Men, for they need to protect, restore and preserve our culture heritage, before it completely vanishes by the harsh destructions of WWII. When the war began in 1939, George Scout immediately saw all of the destruction it was already creating to out artistic side of our culture. From this, he proposed the formation of the group the Monuments Men, which he also called his “brain child.” After his initial attempt to create a …show more content…
Before reading this book, I did not really have the knowledge of this “treasure hunt” the book described. To me, this side of WWII is not deeply described when being taught about this war in school. However, I now understand the importance of this story, and question why this side of the war is not described in more detail. It is said that we were fighting for the preservation of our culture, which is the background of our way of life. In general, the historical topic is considered WWII, but in short, it is the story of the Monuments Men. Therefore, in regards to Western Civilization, WWII had a major impact. For instance, the disturbing horrors of the war caused civilization to question the Enlightenment idea of society’s way of life. In regards to the Monuments men, they fought to save our culture by protecting our architecture and art pieces, which is the fundamentally formation of not only Western Civilization, bit also modern civilization. In my personal opinion, this book was excellent in describing both the unknown story and WWII. I have a complete understanding on a subject I knew very little about, and for this, I applaud the authors for their descriptive works and their ability to truly capture the importance of the Monuments Men to WWII. Another reason I was fascinated by this book was that my grandfather served in WWII and was awarded the Purple Heart. In one section of the book, the authors describe the bombing at Pearl Harbor and those who received this awarding during this event. My grandfather was one of them. Therefore, I became suddenly interested in the book and wanted to continuously read. I would recommend this book to others, because of the shire fact that everyone should be aware of those who risked, and even some who lost their lives to protect our
Synthesis Essay A monument is a statue, building, or other structure built in order to honor a famous person or event. Monuments come in all different forms, they are important in which they help remind individuals about significant times in history. Society has different views on what should be considered when a group/agency is creating a memorial. For something to justify the creation of a monument, something important must take place in history.
Monument Wars by Kirk Savage is a work that aims to investigate the larger significance of the progress of the planning and edifices of the National Mall which is the face of the United States’ capital. Savage looks at the many near-forgotten statues in hidden areas of the city along with the major monuments that most people can name in his inspection. Among Savage’s many points such as the National Mall, as it is known today, is a far cry from the plan that city designer Pierre L’Enfant had originally designed for it; Savage is clear on his thesis that the shifting role of memorials, tributes, and monuments in society can easily be drawn to the nation’s capital. Savage begins by explaining how important the National Mall was to the identity
World War II (WWII) is a very common topic discussed in high school english classes mainly due to the facts that WWII is a perfect example of good vs. evil in the real world and there is an endless amount of books written about this tragic era in history. Two examples of these type of books are Laura Hillenbrand’s Unbroken and Elie Wiesel’s Night; and like all of the other WWII books, these two address themes about the hardships of war and how hope is always present. One specific theme that these books support is that in war, there will always be peace; this is shown through elements of faith, happiness, and trauma. To begin, the two main characters of the books Unbroken and Night face a struggle with their individual faiths, but in very different ways. Louis (Louie) Zamperini initially was not the most religious man but when faced with the most dire of situations he turned to God repeatedly for help and counsel.
But what else is similar between real and fiction and what is different? This comparative essay will review the similarities and differences between the actual war and the events that take place in the novel, All Quiet on the Western Front. This includes both the book and history confirm they had the use of trench warfare and the PTSD or “Shell Shock”that came
‘‘World War II is the greatest drama in human history, the biggest war ever and a true battle of good and evil.’’ The Book Thief and Unbroken both are stories about World War II. But from two completely different perspectives. In The Book Thief, Liesel is adopted by Hans and Rosa, moving to Germany.
the book starts off good in the begining, but reading a little bit into the first 50 or 60 pages it hits a dull spot, where the author goes into too much detail about random people on the island, goes into too much Army or Navy languege that at times might be over peoples heads and might be hard to follow. The only other fault with the book is that might have a feel of a post-war "greatest generation" mentality to it, so it might not have a modern propesctive on the subject, buts its understandable since the book was written in the early 1950 's. So in conclusion, Day of Infamy by does hold up as a definitive book about Pearl Harbor, because the author does have a genuine intrest about the subject that Walter Lord really wanted to get it right, make sure all sides were told in the story, to capture the true emotions of that day, and though at at times the author is a little long-wineded and dry at times in the book, the book does hold as a solid account of Pearl Harbor and anyone wanting to learn about the subject should read
Conscientious Objector Film Essay The Webster’s dictionary defines a Conscientious Objector as “a person who refuses to serve in the armed forces or bear arms on moral or religious grounds”. Private Desmond Doss only reflects the later half of this definition of a Conscientious Objector as, while he refused to carry a gun, he otherwise desired to serve in the armed forces. The reasoning behind Doss’ refusal to carry a gun lies behind his parent’s troubled history, in which Desmond was forced to disarm his belligerent father vowing to never carry a gun after this altercation.
The need to memorialize events or people is complex; in some cases, monuments honor moments of great achievement, while in other cases, monuments pay homage to deep sacrifice. A monument 's size, location, and materials are all considerations in planning and creating a memorial to the past. In any case, the need to honor or pay homage to a specific person or event is prevalent within society. A monument has to mean something to the society it is place in. The location of a monument is perhaps the most important aspect of creating a successful monument to honor and show respect to a person or event.
Daniel Webster, in his speech made at the Bunker Hill Monument in 1825, commemorates the famous battle against the British in 1825. Webster observes the importance of the monument what the monument means for the new American nation. He wields an arsenal of repetition and emotion to convey his points about the Bunker Hill Monument and attempts to evoke a sense of unity for the audience and the new American nation. Webster starts his speech by describing the feeling he and his listeners are receiving from being at the monument.
Monument 14 impacts society by showing how catastrophes can affect people and it also shows how dependent we have become on other people and other objects in our daily life. There are a lot of moments in Monument 14 that make you think about how you would react if you were in that situation. This book serves as a good example or a lesson for us in today’s world. It makes us wonder about the possibilities of that happening in real life and really makes us think hard about how we are living our current
Should monuments be removed? For many years people have been arguing whether certain controversial monuments, such as statues, should be destroyed or removed. A common type of monuments in this situation are the Confederacy monuments. These are various statues across the US which honor Confederate leaders or “heroes”. Many see these offensive since those people basically oppressed African Americans for years and were fighting to keep doing so.
Pearl Harbor is just one event that has shaped American history. With this being a topic of interest to many, authors like to use it as a setting for a fictional story. As a reader, it is important to remember that when reading historical fiction, some elements of the story will be truth while others will be made up. In the book A Boy at War it would seem that the author Harry Mazer was concerned about making a book book as well as it portraying history.
Mount Rushmore is one of the world’s largest engineering and sculpting projects. John Gutzon de la Mothe Borglum is best known for Mount Rushmore. Borglum was born of Danish immigrants in the Idaho Territory on March 25, 1867. As a young and independent man, Borglum went to San Francisco to attend The Mark Hopkins Art Institute. Borglum wasn’t interested in painting and drawing so he left for Paris in 1887 to study sculpting.
Indiana Jones is a classic movie about a college professor who teaches ethical archaeology in class but when he’s outside of the classroom he is out in the field, fighting bad guys, running from natives, or destroying ancient temples in search for treasure. Although many would like to think this is what archaeology is all about, many real archaeologists would be disgusted to work alongside Indy on a dig. Any real archaeologist can tell you that this hollywood spoof is just a fictional depiction of how the job really is and may create hype of the scientific field but doesn't really show us what the field is really all about. There are codes of ethics to archaeology that our buddy Indy just doesn't quite follow ( Fagan 2012:37).
In the film, “The Monuments Men,” we get a good understanding about what happened of pieces of art during World War II. This is my view on the film, “The Monument Men.” The film begins with Frank Stokes, played by George Clooney, talking to the President about getting a small group of men to go find important pieces of art like Leonardo da Vinci’s “Mona Lisa” and “Last Supper,” Jan van Eyck’s “Ghent Altarpiece,” and Michelangelo’s “Madonna of Bruges.”