Abstract This paper demonstrated how rhetoric was used as art of persuasion in two chosen speeches before 2000, those from Alexander the Great and Mahatma Gandhi. The overall aim of this paper was to demonstrate how the use of the same rhetorical devices—in this case, the use of a credible ethos—could have quite different effects in different contexts. The definition and the main characteristics of rhetorical devices used for the analysis and the comparison of the two speeches were based on a mix between classical rhetoric by Aristotle and modern business rhetoric by Higgins and Walker (2012). Although the speeches by Alexander the Great and Mahatma Gandhi have geographical aspects and persuasive appeals in common, they are in fact very different. …show more content…
Mahatma Gandhi. Just by hearing his name, many people think of one of the most influential public speakers in the world 's history. His profound spirituality and belief in justice inspired the world. Many people nowadays tend to cite and refer to his quotes when talking about freedom, non-violence, etc. In addition to that, there is also the physical aspect of his legacy: just looking at his picture and seeing his skinny body and the warm look on his face actually leaves the impression of a humble, modest man. This automatically tends to be associated with benevolence, which is an important aspect of a credible ethos. It is his personality and it is his life style that inspired people, brought him popularity, and let people be persuaded by him. For a speaker with a credible visual ethos it is also important to have, besides intelligence and good will, an upright character. A person with an upright character is simply a person with a positive character, which means that that person has a satisfied conscience and is calm in nature. Such a person is seen as a helper and someone who wins the hearts of people (Soomro, 2013). Mahatma Gandhi was seen as a helper who wanted to help Indian people to become independent without sacrificing people 's lives. And besides that it is not hard to imagine that he had a satisfied conscience knowing that he was doing something good for his country and people as well as promoting democracy in a
There are many schools, streets, libraries named after him. In general, testimony from people who stood up against injustice at the time they are living are highly considered. We think of Nelson Mandela,
He lacked compassion, a sense of dignity, and respect for humanity. Gandhi, a man who excelled in character resulting in long lasting successful leadership. His character was honest, peaceful, and steadfast. He is remembered for the good leadership he had due to character. In, The Killer Angels, by Michael
In persuasive speaking, using rhetorical strategies such as ethos, pathos, and logos is essential to connect with the audience and persuade them. In this essay, we will focus on the use of these strategies in Jeffrey Sachs's "The End of Poverty" and Dan Gilbert's "The Surprising Science of Happiness" Ted Talks. By comparing the use of rhetorical strategies in Sachs's and Gilbert's talks, we can understand how different approaches to persuasion can affect the effectiveness of the speaker's argument. Both speakers use personal anecdotes to establish ethos and connect with the audience. In the first piece of writing, Sachs uses his experience and longevity in the field of poverty reduction to establish his credibility and authority on the subject.
George Orwell - a dystopian novelist and critic - states that “the essence of being human is that one does not seek perfection.” Gandhi, a spiritual and political saint, states that individuals should aspire to reach this “perfection,” while Orwell asserts with a cautionary tone that this lifestyle can backfire. By utilizing various rhetorical strategies, he qualifies Gandhi’s argument to advise the leader’s followers, as well as the general public, that perfection - the praised lifestyle - can do more harm than good. To build his own credibility, Orwell contends that Gandhi’s teachings are not completely untrue - rather partially true.
Mahatma Gandhi Manav Patel Mahatma Karamchand Gandhi was a humanitarian who used peaceful topics to fight for the freedom of India. He walked 250 miles from his Ashram to Dandi, a coast off of Eastern India. He then proceeded to pick up a lump of salt, thereby defying British Law. This story leads us to ask the question, why did Gandhi’s nonviolent movement work? Basically, he could convince the people to join him instead of killing off nonbelievers.
Jay Heinrichs beautifully transforms these approaches to rhetoric into a way that make sense today. From examples using celebrities, political powers, humor, and intellectual banter, Heinrichs truly encompasses the real art of persuasion in a way that complies with modern times, therefore proving the books continued use without a
Pertaining to the Rhetoric of Aristotle and the influential nature it has on the society of today, several things have transcended time, and remain of influence to the social order. The idea that “Rhetoric falls into three divisions, determined by the three classes of listeners to speeches,” (Aristotle) characterized by a ‘division of oratory’ – political, forensic, and the ceremonial oratory of display, are several things that remain important. As Political Orators, sometimes called legislative oratory, “[urge] us either to do or not to do something,” (Aristotle) it is very necessary to today, as laws continue to change and evolve. Political orators, generally argue about or debate things concerning the future of society; in essence, they will always be
The power of persuasion is one that has proved its influence all throughout the history of humanity, convincing the masses to think as one body. This talent is not without practice or order however, even those talented with influence must be organized and eloquently sew their words together to prove a point. Only arguments that can appeal to all are able to be successful. In President John F. Kennedy’s Speech “Peace Speech”, examples of Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion are used. Kennedy uses the appeal of his credibility (Ethos), emotion (Pathos), and logic (Logos) to support his argument against war.
Persuasion has been used to not change the minds of people, but rather to make them . “Ethos, pathos, and logos are frequently used in the Declaration of Independence,” (Root). Historical figures have used the rhetorical technique of persuasion to change the path that history takes. In the 1770’s, the Declaration of Independence was signed to show that the America’s separated themselves from the Great Britains. “That they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is and ought to be totally Dissolved,” (pg 115 line 19).
On March 2, 1930, Gandhi wrote a letter to the Lord viceroy, though he never gained a response. In Gandhi’s attempt to persuade the Lord into changing the English Rule, he uses ethos and pathos as his strategies, but fails to convince him. Although Gandhi and the Lord are on opposing sides, he must try to help get rid of the Salt Taxation and influence the Indian Independence. The main strategies Gandhi uses are ethos, used to gained trust, and pathos, which is used to bring emotion forward from the reader.
Gandhi created a revolution of change in India. He had an enormous impact that forever that vibrant country, and he did it all with nonviolence. Gandhi led people and taught them to stand up for themselves and in the process made India a free and independent country. The unfair treatment would no longer stand, it was time for change. The nonviolence policy worked because Gandhi did not give in, he accepted punishment and responsibility, and his followers were loyal.
The Great Alexander of Macedonia, addressed exhausted men midst field to carry on a battle against enemies. In fact , Shyam Sunder’s presidential address fiery than Alexander, each sentence applauded, believe it or not that the people present at the conference were so charged, and subsequent day most of the participants took out a massive procession with arms and marched through the main streets of the city and which was nothing but massive display of
These strong pathos appeals and honorific terms in return build his credibility to his audience. This use of pathos to build ethos is quite effective in opening the ears of everyone in the audience.
The historical figure that I admire the most is Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. He was a good and confident leader. His speeches were encouraging and influential to a lot of other people as well. I admire the way he was able to stand in front of a crowd of millions of people and still be able to deliver a speech that is so powerful and confident.
Gandhi was an incredible and an inspiration on lots of people all around the world including civil rights