Rhetorical Analysis Of Don T Blame The Eater

644 Words3 Pages

Through the span of twenty years, it is clear that America has faced evolving obesity percentages. These obesity percentages correlate usually with children, and adolescents. However, the rate of obese personage lightened in the last few years. David Zinczenko, Men’s Health Magazine’s editor in chief, distributed his article, “Don't Blame the Eater” in 2002. In this article, he targets the reader's attention by informing them of the harsh realities and ramifications of Fast Food Industries. He offered a direct ordeal of the issue and enacts plausibility within the article by clarifying how it discombobulated his adolescence. His accusations portray the fast food industries as the guilty party, rather than the customer. With the utilization …show more content…

Therefore, the intended audience can Envision him being a sluggish fat adolescent as an after effect of consuming fast food. He additionally applies tone to the text to further contend his argued point. He uses his frank tone to present his targeted group of readers about the expanding rate of obesity among the youth. He also specifies that if young people were to drive around their facility, it would be complicated for them to buy a grapefruit if they wanted one. Obesity in children brought on by fast food eateries as indicated in the article is put into viewpoint by enacting individual point of view. In the Article, Zinczenko clarified the circumstances that prompted his usage of fast food by using personal perspective, where he offers a memory from his biography to clarify this fast food threat. When he was 15 years old, a young Zinczenko was brought up by his mom, a single parent that needed to work for extended periods of time to pay the bills and did not provide adequate food for the household. He was left with no other decision than to consume food from several fast food restaurants such as McDonald's, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, or KFC. The usage of personal point of view in his article initiates the reader to relate along with the realities brought out through the personalized part of the

Open Document