In Florence Kelley’s speech she talks about child labor and everything bad about it. She is speaking to the attendees of the Woman Suffrage convention; however, she is also speaking to the people of America as a whole. She is fighting to abolish the ridiculous working conditions of child labor She believes it is wrong to work a child an extended amount of time. This speech is also a way to gain the ability for women to vote. It shows women have the desire to make a change in the country. She forces her audience to think about themselves in comparison with the working children constantly throughout the speech. She associates the working with when they sleep. “Tonight while we sleep, several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all the night through…” This makes the audience feel guilty and truly think about how they have it compared to the children. This strategy is amplified by the fact it is …show more content…
People can make a change and not allow children to do such labor. She also repeats “free the children” many times in her call to action. It really emphasizes the awfulness of the labor to the point that they need to be freed. Like slaves, to be freed from horrendous tasks. Repeating it over and over again is to stick it in her audience's head. However, she knows women can not vote yet, this is why her call to action is truly effective. It is pushing her audience to where they must vote. Women really care about children, most are mothers, and as such most women want to protect their children from being basically a slave. She is wanting to vote, as do the women at the convention, but this speech gives them a grand reason to need to vote. The need to make a change becomes apparent and this speech will push them over the top to do everything in their power to vote. Women want the power to vote away laws that men simply
The speaker reveals her experience with child labor by using rhetorical strategies. She uses repetition in the beginning of her speech to emphasize her point. She states, “Men increase, women increase, youth increase, boys increase…” to give a point to the audience and readers. The word “increase” is being repeated to demonstrate how bad the wage earning raised so quickly through different people of age; to everyone basically.
When she does use pathos, she accompanies it with uses of logic and fundamentally relatable situations. One of the most emotionally appealing statements she made in her entire speech was her reference to the voting techniques she saw as a child, and how terrible they were. She uses this concept to show how the unfairness of males being able to vote and women not caused pain and a general sense of not truly being free. To balance out her use of emotional appeal in reference to the human struggle, she argues that "when we take so much pains to adapt the ballot to the male intelligence of the United States, we should be very humble when we talk about female ignorance" (Shaw). She not only makes an emotional appeal to women by using a blanket statement to say women are not ignorant, but also negates the possibility of an anti-suffragist saying she is being emotionally unreasonable.
She establishes credibility and states logistics through the general truth that all white men can vote,” All white men in this country have the same rights” but women cannot. The right is ours. The question now is: how shall we get possession of what rightfully belongs to us? We should not feel so sorely grieved if no man who had not attained the full stature of a Webster, Clay, Van Buren, or Gerrit Smith could claim the right of the elective franchise. But to have drunkards, idiots, horse-racing, rum-selling rowdies, ignorant foreigners, and silly boys fully recognized, while we ourselves are thrust out from all the rights that belong to citizens, it is too grossly insulting to the dignity of woman to be longer quietly submitted to.
Woman Suffrage Women's right activist, Carrie Catt, in her speech, “Address to Congress on Women’s Suffrage”, explains how woman suffrage in inevitable. Catt’s purpose is to convince Congress that it is time for woman suffrage. She adopts a confident tone , uses direct quotations, and appeals to logos in order to convince Congress that it is time for woman suffrage. A confident tone is adopted by Catt throughout her entire speech to congress. Catt opens with “Woman suffrage is inevitable.”
The purpose of the speech was to pressure Congress into passing a legislation that would give women the right to vote in the United States of America. She delivered the address in November 1917, in Washington, DC with the
Carrie Chapman Catt, an effective advocate for women 's rights, utilizes Ethos and Logos effective to craft a persuasive argument for the suffrage of women. In Catt’s speech “Address to Congress on Women’s Rights,” she utilizes Logos to gain support for women’s rights. She creates a compelling argument through her concession, repetition, and historical facts to back up what she says. Catt uses concession effectively in her well planned speech. This is evidenced in the line “Gentlemen, we hereby petition you, our only designated representatives, to ...(fight for women’s suffrage)... and to use your influence to secure its ratification in your own state, in order that the women of our nation may be endowed with political freedom before the next
As we see today women are more than capable to run companies, countries, and anything else they perceive. All in all, I can say that I agree with everything this speech
The women’s suffrage movement was a very difficult time for these women at the time. On June 20, 1908 is when the suffrage day happened and everyone was there including the women who wanted their right to vote. The women went through some difficulties to get their right to vote. Speeches were being given that day. Four years later a march happened.
In the second primary source document “The March of the Mill Children” Mother Jones explains her journey to stop the crime of child labor. After seeing the severed hands of many children working in the mills she made the decision to show this issue to the nation and marched down Independence Park to the courthouse. The movement continued and the goal was to get the presidents attention so that congress
Young people in the 21st Century need to reevaluate their ethics; David McCullough is helping them understand that by explaining that they need to be honest with themselves and their reality. His scathing criticism of them and their culture, philosophies, and ideologies, is justified and insightful; teens in the United States allows special to become a meaningless term, prefers to win instead of achieving, and cares too much about superficial accomplishments instead of internal growth. McCullough makes a point throughout his speech to say that being special is not just given to you; teenagers are not special by default. In the speech, while he is explaining why young people should look forward to more than just being special or different, in
The late 19th century consisted of rigid work hours for children, the growth of strikes, and the use of yellow journalism. It was a challenging time for anyone below the upper class to live in. This is demonstrated throughout Newsies, a Broadway Musical displaying the challenges from this time period. Child labor, a major part of the movie, was the way of life and consisted of young children doing hard work as a vital part of the nation’s economy and income of families of the time. Another part of the movie, strikes, were the people’s way of refusing to work as a result of not getting their desires.
Throughout the essay, the there’s repetition in the phrase “while we sleep.” This phrase affects the overall essay while leaving a strong impression on the audience. The phrase can appeal to ethos by pulling sympathy out of the audience because while there’s children working through the nights, they are just sleeping. Kelly makes them feel as if they are treating the issues of child labors as not important because it’s an issue they can just sleep through every night.
Jeanne Bouviers childhood is a perfect example of why they should raise awareness on the issue of child labor. Jeanne Bouvier was a woman who lived 99 years. 1865-1964. She was a child who lived through child labor. She began working at the age of 11.
According to the Massachusetts AFL-CIO, “The mill girls also took a great step for women’s rights as they took matters into their own hands and struck against injustice imposed by the mill owners.” This demonstrates how powerful women can be if they join together to make a
Geography – Movie Analysis Kevinsyah 11 Social 4th December 2015 Dark Side Of The Cholocate This Movie is about child labour, child labour is when childrens started to work for companies and producers which involves lifting things, building things, planting, etc. It is against the law because childrens are suppose to attend regular school meetings by gaining knowledge even more for their own future, which is why against the law because it could potentially be dangerous and harmful for the children itself. Socially, it can effect the childrens personal life because it could also lead to abusement to children because they're forced to work, physically, children are not ready to do heavy work that could effect their health and their physicall health. These are the main causes of Child Labour: Iliteracy, illiterate parents who are not educated tend to let their kids to work as slaves for chocolate companies.