The Roe vs. Wade case was started by a young woman named Norma McCorvey, better known to the public as Jane Roe. Norma McCorvey was one of many women who wanted to get an abortion, but couldn’t. In the state of Texas getting an abortion was considered a crime. In 1969, Norma McCorvey discovered she was pregnant at 21 years old. McCorvey was unmarried, and already had a 5 year old daughter. Her mother had custody of her daughter, because she couldn’t afford to take care of her. McCorvey was working as a waitress, when she found out she was pregnant. She had previously worked with a traveling circus, selling tickets. She didn’t have any money, and felt like she wasn’t fit to care for a child. Therefore, she wanted to get an abortion. However, where she lived they were …show more content…
Both Coffee and Weddington were two recent graduates of the University of Texas Law School. McCorvey agreed to be the plaintiff in the case. She was told that she would have to give birth, because the decision wouldn’t arrive soon enough. McCorvey was also concerned about the publicity she would be getting from the case. In order to protect her identity she went by the fictitious name Jane Roe. In 1970, McCorvey filed a lawsuit against district attorney Henry Wade. Henry Wade was the district attorney for Dallas County, where she resided. He was in favor of the abortion laws Texas had in place. Roe vs. Wade first went through federal court, and then it was appealed to the Supreme Court. McCorvey believed Texas abortion law was unconstitutionally vague, and violated her right to privacy. She also wanted to obtain an injunction to prevent Wade from enforcing the law, but it was never issued (“Roe v. Wade” par. 2). McCorvey and her attorneys relied on precedents such as Griswold v. Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. Baird, as well as important constitutional amendments to win the
To some up the verdict it was held to not further restrict abortion during that time. O’Connor always looked over each case with an open mind and with a clear understanding of the law. The court has always made the standard for affirmative action cases, high but without O’Connor moderating influence many cases probably could have gone another way. Sandra O’Connor became the crucial fifth vote in cases that involves federalism.
From 1848 to 1920, an outrageous span of 70 years, women fought for equal rights, to have their voices and opinions heard. Little by little women have gained rights they have so passionately fought for. In 1973, about 50 years after women became eligible to vote, and began to be taken more seriously, the case of Roe v Wade granted women to have one of the most impactful rights to date, to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Now, it is safe to say that all women and perhaps most men would not want women to lose the rights they have today, especially because there have been many influential women around the world who have been given the chance to be impactful because of the rights they possess. So, if we do not want to take away women’s rights and
Texas ruled in her favor, and Wade appealed to The Supreme Court who then reviewed the case through 1971 and 1972. The court ruled that the law did in fact violate her right to privacy as child rearing is covered under privacy. This decision impacts me of course because I am a woman. It impacts society as a
Prior to the case it was the state that determined the legality of abortions. Jane Roe, (alias), was an unmarried and pregnant Texas citizen in 1970. She wanted to have an abortion, but Texas abortion law made it a felony to abort a fetus unless “on medical advice for the purpose of saving the life of the mother.” Roe filed suit against Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County, Texas to challenge the law outlawing abortion. At the time, many states had outlawed abortion except in cases where the mother’s life was in danger.
Casey. Mainly, Sandra Day O’Connor delivered a ruling that a new standard would be followed. This was known as the “undue burden” standard (Perry). The constitutionality of each of the state abortion laws would be determined by the degree of what would be measured, as a "burden" based on each case for any woman, seeking an abortion (NCHLA). This would mean that if the "burden" was "undue," for any reason, then the law would be then deemed unconstitutional (NCHLA).
Roe wanted to terminate her pregnancy through abortion which was prohibited in the state of Texas unless it was to save the life of the pregnant woman. She challenged the law with her attorney Sarah Weddington, used the constitution to make strong argument for her client against the state of Texas concerning abortion. This case went all the way to the Supreme Court where the arguments for each side were heard twice. Weddington, Roe attorney not being strong in her first argument came back in the second argument with a big finish and made history.
Seward, S. (2014). Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). Retrieved from The Embryo Project Encyclopedia:
“On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in Roe v. Wade, a challenge to a Texas statute that made it a crime to perform an abortion unless a woman’s life was at stake. The case had been filed by “Jane Roe,” an unmarried woman who wanted to safely and legally end her pregnancy. Siding with Roe, the court struck down the Texas law. In its ruling, the court recognized for the first time that the constitutional right to privacy “is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy” (Roe v. Wade, 1973).
In Roe v. Wade, the woman 's right to abortion was upheld (American History). It resulted to wide disparity among those who believe that life is considered as sacred. Such individuals included large number of Catholics,
McCorvey ("Jane Roe"), claiming a Texas law criminalizing most abortions violated Roe 's constitutional rights. (PBS) The Court argued that the Constitution 's First, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments (Roe v. Wade The Abortion Rights Controversy in America History) protect an individual 's "zone of privacy" against state laws and cited past cases ruling that marriage, contraception, and child rearing are activities covered in this "zone of privacy." (PBS) In addition, this case was against Henry Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County from 1951 to 1987, who enforced a Texas law that prohibited abortion, except to save a woman 's life.
Abortion was illegal in many states. Domestic violence was growing with rape victims growing as well. Women wanted more freedom in their values other than appealing to men values. “Roe V. Wade”, a supreme court case that ruled abortion was right for women to choose if they wanted to take that action or not. A win for equality, bitterness by those who dislike the decision.
Kay Bailey Hutchison She was born in Galveston, Texas, on July 22, 1944 but grew up in La Marque, Texas. She soon she grew up and married John Pierce Parks (m.1967-1969) but soon moved to Dallas and married a man named Ray Hutchison (m.1978), who was a former state representative. She had 4 kids Kathryn Bailey, Houston Taylor, Julie, Brenda Hutchison.
Henry Morgentaler is a name known by many Canadians, to some he is a courageous champion of women’s rights, to many other ’s he was despicable criminal guilty of one of the most heinous crimes there is: the murder of a child. One undisputable fact about Morgentaler however is that he has had a profound and long lasting impact on Canadian society. He is most famous for being one of the key players in the 1988 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that declared the law prohibiting abortion unconstitutional.
Before Roe v. wade the number of deaths from illegal abortions was around 5000 and in the 50s and 60s the number of illegal abortions ranged from 200,000 to 1.2 million per year. These illegal abortions pose major health risks to the life of the woman including damage to the bladder, intestines as well as rupturing of the uterus. The choice to become a mother must be given to the woman most importantly because it’s her body, her health, and she will be taking on a great responsibility. A woman’s choice to choose abortion should not be restricted by anyone; there are multiple reasons why abortion will be the more sensible decision for the female.
Doris Gudino Professor Chounlamountry Political Science 1 27 July 2015 Pro-Choice Anyone? A woman has, undoubtedly, the freedom to procreate, but once a woman chooses to retreat from that freedom, a commotion arises. Abortion is a woman’s choice for many reasons. It’s her body, therefore, no one else can decide for said person.