Sam Houston is undoutabley a hero in many ways. He possess heroic traits such as intelligence, boldness, bravery, and compassion. But in my opinion, his most heroic decision of all was when he voted against the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
This act was an act that promoted Popular Sovereignty. If it were to be ratified, it would legalize slavery in Kansas and Nebraska, even though the states were above the Missouri Compromise Line. Houston was intelligent to see that this would lead to war with the North, saying that the South would “go down ... in a sea of blood and smoking ruin.” (Doc C 1). The vote results were 71 to 3, ratifying the act and sparking more tensions which would later lead to war with the North. The Civil War. Houston was right. And, he was also brave and bold all at once to speak out about what he thought would happen instead of agreeing with
…show more content…
Houston had some other heroic decisions to make, but none of them were ever as heroic as voting against the Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854. One of these decisions that was not as heroic was when he sent the letter to Travis saying to abandon the Alamo. He did demonstrate concern for those people in the Alamo, and intelligence for putting the pieces together to find out what would happen next. But, he never had to go through being brave to stand against the majority face to face, or risk losing his place as a senator, (he was not one at the time, but was when he opposed the act,) and he did not demonstrate that much courage or at least as much as he had to while voting against the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. Another heroic decision that was not as heroic as voting against the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was Houston’s inaugural address from the first time he became president of the Republic of Texas. The
Houston and the Kansas-Nebraska act: Yes Gave a choice to adopt slavery Sam houston voted against it Sam houston said that it will go down in a sea of blood and smoking ruin That their will be no war with them Houston and the union: The constitution Like huge war with a lot of chaos going on Sam houston does not have anyone on his boat with him this implies that no one survived
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, narrowly passed while Congressmen brandished weapons and uttered death threats in the House chambers, overturned parts of the Missouri Compromise by allowing the settlers in the two territories to determine whether or not to permit slavery by a popular vote. Pro- and anti-slavery agitators flocked to Kansas, hoping to shift the decision by sheer weight of numbers. “The two factions struggled for five years with sporadic outbreaks of bloodshed that claimed fifty-six lives.” Although both territories eventually ratified anti-slavery constitutions, the violence shocked and troubled the nation.
The Texas Constitution was a product of the Reconstruction era, the tumultuous period that preceded the Civil War. The document reflects the fears and hopes of its framers. They were fearful of an oppressive state after living under the oppressive scrutiny of the Reconstruction Era. They hoped to prevent that from happening again by putting strong restraints on the government. Most of those restraints have followed Texas into the modern era.
The Thirteenth Amendment took some time to pass. Johnson really didn’t want blacks to have rights. He did everything in his power to make sure African Americans didn’t have freedom. After slavery was abolished the black codes came up in the summer of 1865 in the South. These codes were basically promoting slavery once again but using a different name.
The Nullification Crisis was an event that happened between the years of 1828 and 1832. There were many reasons that this crisis occurred. Many of these reasons could have been avoided from happening. The event that really started it all was the Tariff of 1828. One of the tariffs done during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, it was tax on goods that were imported and sold.
Imagine a being in line to vote for non-slavery in the newly established state, Kansas, right before the voting house became overfilled with southern voters voting on slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska act allowed the people of the Kansas and the Nebraska Territories to vote on whether the state is a non-slave or a slave state. The Kansas Nebraska act should have never happened because it overturned the Missouri compromise, violence broke out in kansas, and southern voters illegally voted in the kansas voting. One of the main reason why the Kansas-Nebraska act should have never happened is because it overturned the Missouri Compromise which was made official in 1820. For example, “To win southern support, Douglas proposed that slavery in the new
Previous to the compromise, the northern states held a majority in the House of Representatives and an equal count in the Senate. The south feared that the addition of Missouri as a free state would give northern states the power to outlaw slavery. Ultimately, the south was able to maintain the former political balance in the Congress. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 temporarily settled differences between the regions but could not prevent the inevitable outbreak of the Civil War. An unintentional consequence of another act, the Louisiana Purchase,
When the south seceded from the Union, the Confederacy was formed and the Civil War began. The Emancipation Proclamation was issued in 1863 by Lincoln as the Civil War was coming to its third year. The proclamation states that “all persons held as slaves within any State”... “shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free;” This document was revolutionary because it freed all former slaves. However, Abraham Lincoln did this only because he was convinced it was a reliable military strategy.
The House of Representatives narrowly approved gradual manumission 80 Northern votes to 14 while the South object just two votes to 64. But the slave states had greater strength in the Senate; besides, three of the four senators from Illinois and Indiana reflected the sentiment of settlers from the South and voted against the amendment. The Senate refused to accept any restriction on slavery and that was the reason that led to the Missouri compromise. Many of the senate leaders worked behind the scenes to create a compromise and break the dead end.
How the Civil War Came to Be Was the Civil War very “civil” at all? The Civil War had many factors that led into it but there was one major factor that started the war. Slavery was one of the biggest factors in the Civil War. There was a big issue that divided the North and South which was slavery. The wide spread of slavery was a big deal to most Americans; but some were not the biggest fans of the concept.
Houston was adopted by Cherokee Indians and spent most of his teenaged life with them (10). He even received a calling name Co-lo-neh, the raven, from Cherokee (29). Crisp believed that Houston who made a quality friendship with Indians would not disrespect them in the speech at Refugio. In addition, Houston refused to take an oath of allegiance to the confederacy at 1861, even though as a result, he needed to sacrifice his position in Texas Government (11). This fact justified that Houston strongly opposed the slavery and white supremacy.
The Battle of New Orleans was a big victory because the wee outnumbered and only 20 died. To further prove that Andrew Jackson was a hero is that he signed the treaty of fort jackson. This prevented destruction. Although it stopped the war it did force the creek people to give up nearly 22 million acres of their land. The Natives had lost 300,000 worth of stuff.
The Kansas- Nebraska Act allowed divided western land into the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to choose the issue of slavery by popular sovereignty. This increased sectional tensions because the South wanted to build a southern railroad, as it would increase economic growth. Also, the North was upset because of the possibility of the expansion of slavery into western territories. Also, on the day of voting, border ruffians came from Missouri to vote in support of slavery. This greatly upset the North, especially the free-soilers.
Douglas, was an important election that would, and did, go down in history. Lincoln had opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, created by Stephen Douglas, which lead him into becoming a Republican. Here, nobody was able to Compromise. He ran against Stephen Douglas, and won the election with getting one hundred eighty electoral votes, and Douglas getting twelve (Southern Democrat Breckinridge seventy-two, and Constitutional Union Bell getting thirty-nine) (Doc H).