Issue: Within the last decade, San Francisco has dramatically changed. San Francisco’s working class people and poor neighborhoods underwent drastic economic and racial changes from the 1990s to mid 2000s, resulting in the undeniable gentrification of the districts. San Francisco’s gentrification has reached a ridiculous new extreme, making it the most expensive city in the country, outstripping even Manhattan. The beginning of the issue was right after the dotcom and Tech industries started drastically moving to the Bay Area. In 2005, new technology companies like Google, Facebook, and Cisco began attracting thousands of high-paid employees to the bay. The companies moved to the South Bay but the city attracted many of these young techies. …show more content…
Soon there will be no home for minorities and lower income in San Francisco. The districts of San Francisco soon will lose all its original dwellers to the high demands of the Bay Area. The new, “improved” population is overtaking a district such as the Mission that historically has been home to Central and South American immigrants. As you stroll down Valencia Street, once home to taquerias, bakeries, bars and auto mechanic shops, one can instantly see the difference. The addition of organic ice cream shops, chain restaurants, luxury condominiums, and cafes serving beignets and soy lattes are steadily replacing the 99-cent stores, sex shops, thrift stores, and local markets of the city’s original working-class Latino neighborhood. As San Francisco has become one of the hottest living destinations for the new techies that have moved to the Silicon Valley, the Mission has become one of the liveliest locations in the city. After Mark Zuckerberg’s purchase of an apartment in the mission, it was a must live area for young yuppies and techies. The center of the city has historically been home to Mexican and Central American immigrants whose large families live in small apartments in narrow Victorians and older buildings. Even though the local flavor is still here, the housing prices …show more content…
While providing significant positive environmental effects, the idea of the large tech companies bussing their employees creates some negative externalities. The idea of bussing has become problematic in the Bay Area. Many of the employees want to live in the city and work in the bay. So the companies offer free buses to transport employers from the city to the Bay. The buses can be extremely loud and travel on roads/have stops serviced by San Francisco’s Muni buses. The noise and inconvenience of these buses on narrow residential streets have caused inconveniences for citizens. Another negative externality the tech companies are creating is the effect of driving up rental prices within a walking distance of their company city bus stops. Lower-income people should not bear the brunt of the negative externalities of economic
Alexandra Pelosi interviews with the tech employing have the similar element. The techies don't speak on the issue of gentrification, but they focus on how the scene of San Francisco is the perfect place to develop and create new ideas that will, in turn, lead to better connectivity worldwide. Rhe documentary shifts to the dark side of progress, by focusing more on the act of displacement that the natives of San Francisco are experiencing. Gabriel Sealey-Morris analysis address songs, “Burke's pentadic ratios provide a tangible demonstration of how the songs while using the same essential elements, create remarkably different effects with remarkably minor shifts in emphasis” (Sealey-Morris 408). While Gabriel Sealey-Morris analysis addresses songs, her statement rings true to my analysis because of the scene, San Francisco, is the same in both viewpoints of gentrification, but the effects of the gentrify are shifted to emphasize their elitist demeanor of the cost of progress has on the natives of San Francisco being displaced.
The rising cost of housing in the bay area has made affordable housing harder and harder to come about. This is a situation where the city of Palo Alto does not have enough affordable housing to meet the needs of its population. To fix the situation instead of creating additional affordable housing venues is sticking the Jissers with the bill of providing affordable housing. The reason I chose this article is that it shows that the “system” doesn't work neither the Jissers are at fault nor are the tenants. This is a situation where the city of Palo Alto messed up and now are trying to pen the blame on some private
The average price of the condos on the waterfront went from $219,000 to $200, 000 in the past few months (Seward pg.2, 2015). This decrease in housing prices is not common, though. It is found that when gentrification occurs, the average rents in a neighborhood rises. This is due to new renters who come to these neighborhoods who can afford to pay higher rents which raises the rent (ICPH pg.2, 2009). Resultantly, this causes people to move due to the increased rent.
The city of Tampa has experienced gentrification in several areas over recent years. The latest example that can be pointed out is the resurgence in Seminole Heights (“Once-poor Hillsborough Areas Make Gains”, 2014). Hipsters are now flocking to the area to eat at the trendiest restaurants and visit the newest art spaces. The effect of gentrification in this area is made evident by crimes recently committed in the area: the robberies at the tavern The Independent and the restaurant Fodder and Shine.
Subsidized Los Angeles Los Angeles is often referred to as The City of Angels. Ironically, in Mark Davis’ writing “Fortress Los Angeles,” it seems Los Angeles is anything but a city of angels. The essay makes the reader understand that homelessness and crime rates are a serious and growing epidemic in Los Angeles, so much so that whole buildings have been relocated and designed to isolate the homeless from middle to upper class citizens. Davis starts off his writing with a quick remembrance of how Los Angeles used to be, which provided a vibrant picture of how the city once was, right before tearing the image down and providing a more accurate, but harsh, reality of the city as it now is.
Describe the current event(s) that it is linked to. The author, Willy Staley, seems to have derived inspiration from an article he read about the gentrification of a food called chopped cheese. In his article Staley mentions many phenomenons that have been present in popular culture recently. These are tiny houses, “raw water,” “van life,” and the idea of being a good gentrifier.
This is also how low-income immigrants secured their place in Soma. “Low-income immigrants later found their home in SoMa as rents stayed below the city average”(Phillips). Young entrepreneurs, attracted by the vicinity of SoMa to downtown and low-cost rent, began renting the available empty spaces in SoMa. “Developers soon followed, taking advantage of the flexible zoning, empty warehouses, and lots to build high-rise apartments buildings and office buildings. By the mid-1990’s the dot com boom had established itself in the Bay Area, and SoMa was quickly becoming the San Francisco hub of the
Oscar Paris 12/5/2015 Module 7 Quiz Gentrification is a series of processes which involves the rebuilding of deteriorated areas and the accompanying of an influx of people from the middle or other affluent classes, which often entails the displacement of working class and other residents of lower stature. For an example of these processes of gentrification, I decided to Phoenix, AZ. According to the developers in the area, Phoenix’s urban environment is evolving to meet the standards of being appealing to those who wish to flock the area. There are many examples of this occurring, the Sky Harbor Airport, the Arizona Mills Mall, the scenic views of the South, Camelback, and Squaw mountains, and finally, the plethora of corporate owned buildings which
Wealth is one of the factors why residential segregation is an increasing problem. Golash- Boza explains, “Residential segregation happened when different groups of people are sorted into discount neighborhoods” (271). It is because of housing segregation
As for gentrification moving a minority of people from their homes and replacing them with unreasonably priced condos and such and making new and wealthy people move in making it nearly impossible for the original residents to live there. They both have to do with a disbandment of people, and others moving in to do something “better” with what was left. When really these things were way better and well kept before they were ever interfered
Neoliberalization’s propagation of health inequity in urban rebuilding processes and social movements against them: Baltimore’s story This essay will discuss how neoliberal processes during redevelopment sustain and increase health inequities. It will highlight key neoliberal processes in urban redevelopment and examples of their impact on economic, political, and institutional social capital and subsequent public health effects. Examples of social movements challenging several neoliberal processes will be provided as one path toward changing the roots of health inequities. Introduction Too often neighborhoods which have been historically disinvested and demonized become prime real estate targets for development with the expectation
Gentrification is the process of renovating and improving a house or district so that it conforms to middle-class taste. Real Estate investors usually take low-income places that they feel have a chance to prosper economically, and turn them into areas that attract the middle and upper class workers. In doing so they feel like the low-income areas will be safer and more appealing, attracting more people to visit and live there. An improvement to a poor district sounds beautiful, but is gentrification as great as it’s sought out to be? Many residents have their doubts about gentrification due to the idea that the costs of their living will go up and they will be driven out of their neighborhoods.
There has to be a realistic solution that can be put into motion to benefit everyone involved. Referring again to his article “Is Gentrification All Bad?” Davidson argues that urban renewal, if done right, is not a monstrous custom that it is painted to be; nevertheless, he reasons that gentrification depends on who does it, how they do it, and why they do it. As a resident in New York, a city where gentrification is as widespread as the common cold in winter, Davidson speculates that those who go into a neighborhood with the intention to renovate houses, or abandoned buildings ought to have a good reason for it. The author points out that “Gentrification does not have to be something that one group inflicts on another…” (Davidson 349), rather, he suggests that everyone, the gentrifiers and the locals, be on the same page when it comes to developing their
An article written by Anna Clark titled, “The Unlikely Boom of Chicago’s Chinatown” discusses the lack of gentrification. In this article, she interviewed a Chinese American living in Chicago’s Chinatown, “Chicago Chinatown is the only one in the country that has not been gentrified and also has been expanding,” said resident Wong (Clark). Gentrification has been a pressing issue recently, especially in Chicago neighborhoods such as Pilsen, but Chinatown has grown into a neighborhood with a strong sense of community that has helped it grow and keep its unique culture inside neighborhood
Title: Gentrifying Chicago neighborhoods. General Purpose: To inform my audience of Gentrification in the Norther part of Chicago around the 1960s. Specific Purpose: At the end of my speech, the audience will understand the meaning of gentrification, how Puerto Rican families in the Northern part of Chicago lost their homes to Gentrification, how they fought against gentrification, and how gentrification is now occurring to Mexican families in the Southern part of Chicago. Thesis: Puerto Rican families lost their homes in the 1960s when Lincoln Park was gentrified despites their best efforts, and today Mexican families are losing their homes in Pilsen to gentrification. Introduction I. Attention: What would you risk in order to continue having a home?