Imagine you saw a classmate at school. Everything was fine, and it was a normal day. Later in the day cop cars surround the school. Your classmate is missing. This person could be gone forever, maybe even never seen again or even worse dead. Two prime suspects are from your school, one her ex boyfriend and the other the ex’s friend. This became a reality in Woodlawn High School when Hae Min Lee, a senior, went missing on January 13. Adnan syed, the victim's ex, and Jay, a friend of Adnan’s, are two key suspects in the murder. This case was brought to the public’s attention with help from Sarah Koenig, the producer of a podcast called “Serial”. Serial is about who the world thinks committed this gruesome crime that took place in Baltimore. …show more content…
The cell tower pings don’t line up with the timeline given, which proves Adnan’s innocence along with the support of no DNA evidence being found on the body or in the vehicle. It is not likely that Adnan killed Hae with the time allowed between school and track practice. Sarah koenig and Dana Chivvis took the route that if Adnan killed Hae, would have traveled. The school bell rings at 2:15, Hae was killed at 2:36 and Adnan had to be back in time for track practice at 4. “Twenty-two minutes and two seconds. Yeah we just did it in twenty-two minutes and two seconds. And that was leaving about a minute and a half in the car for the actual killing part” (Koenig, “Route Talk”). That’s how long it took them to get to Best Buy, leaving only one minute and thirty seconds to do the strangulation. Now according to Google, it takes an average of …show more content…
However Jay is as much of a suspect as Adnan. Jay has lied multiple times and changes his story everytime he speaks to the police. For example, “They weren't super close, but they had mutual friends. Jay sold weed, and he and Adnan smoked together. The story Jay told police had problems, because it kept changing from telling to telling” (“The Alibi”). Why would Jay need to keep changing his story if he did not commit the murder. Another coincidence was that jay knew where the car was located and he described the dead body in so much detail (“The Alibi’). There is no way if you glanced at a dead body you would remember so much detail. Also, he would not have known where the car was if he had no part in the murder. Along with the evidence I listed and other inconsistent evidence not adding up, prove Adnan is just as innocent as
Jen saw Jay arrive in Adnan’s car, and after Jay had stepped in her car, she explained how Jay had looked nervous, or otherwise frighten. After a while of silence, Jay had told her what Adnan had done. The only thing different about both Jen’s and Jay’s story is the exact day Jen had taken Jay to the dumpster of Westview mall in order to dispose of the evidence he contained. Jen stated that it was the following day she took Jay. However, Jay claims that it was the exact night the murder had occurred.
This relates back to the previous argument about a possible distortion of the trial against Adnan. Jay’s lies were conveniently ignored because he was the ‘best witness ever’. His story spontaneously
From witnesses, call records and Jay’s interview and testimony, there is enough evidence to prove that Adnan is guilty. After Adnan and Hae’s breakup they still continued to be friends. When Adnan asks for a ride as heard from their friends, Hae declines his request. Supporting evidence 2: As Jay was interview he claimed that Adnan had killed Hae. Since Jay was a witness to this crime, he had told Jennifer Pusateri about it.
Adnan Paper Adnan Syed was eighteen years old when he was accused of murdering his ex girlfriend Hae. Hae was the same age as Adnan and they attended the same school. There are many pieces of evidence for whether he is guilty or not. These pieces of evidence can be both positive and negative in his case.
The prosecution case against Adnan Syed was mainly based on the testimony of Jay wilds, who said he helped bury Hae Min Lee's body. Jay's testimony was supported by the cell phone records that placed Adnan on the site on the Day Hae Min Lee disappeared. According to the prosecution, the evidence sayed that Adnan had a motive to Kill Hae, because he was jealous and possessive of her. However, there are inconsistinces in Jay’s testimony, which has changed multiple times over the years. Some people also claimed that He was pressured into providing false testimony by the police.
There was absolutely no evidence that could tie Adnan to the case, but he was still convicted of the crime. I’m not sure if the crime scene investigators at the time missed any details or didn’t think the case was too important since Adnan was Muslim, but they should have found at least one small piece of evidence. From all the crime scene investigation shows that I have seen over the years the investigators have always, and I mean always found some type of physical evidence from the crime scene or off the victims body. Regardless of any type of crime scene, the investigators always managed to find a shred of evidence so the idea of Adnan’s case having no physical evidence found makes it seem very
Some argue this because if there wasn’t an actual murder committed by Adnan, then Jay wouldn’t know these important details. However, this knowledge provided by Jay could just be proving that Jay is the murderer. For example, Jay claimed he refused to help dig the hole for Hae’s body, but then he claimed he did help dig the hole (Koenig, “Inconsistencies”). That is such a big detail that you would think is hard to forget or mess up. Well, he could have just been saving himself but he was already tied into the murder when he talked with the detectives.
They might also say that the call logs don’t add up and that they are not a reasonable and trustworthy piece of evidence, but again they are wrong. The call logs would add up if you placed Adnan as Jay’s accomplice. The parts of Jay’s story would be true and it would be obvious that Adnan had the phone when the call logs didn’t match up with his story. There is no way that Adnan is innocent. The evidence proves
Using the fact that Adnan led a 'dual life', he is easily found guilty since everyone already thinks of him as shady since they found out he did drugs. But anyone who knew Adnan, knew he wasn't shady. " He was like the community's golden child." , "He was an honor roll student, volunteer EMT. He was on the football team.
Jay's story was did not really line up with all of the cell phone calls besides this one which is the biggest call of the case. And like one of the defence attorneys said you would have to have the worst luck in the world for all of this to happen in the span of a couple hours. It started with him lending jay his car and some people may not think this is that big but jays reasoning is saying that the reason jay had his car so adnan could get into haes car to murder
When Adnan was arrested on February 28, 1999 after Jay’s interview with the police regarding the day Hae Min Lee was declared missing, his alibi contradicts Jay’s alibi and claims that what Jay said was incorrect, according to Adnan. Adnan Syed is not guilty because of his alibi. His alibi did not consist anything that would get him from being put in jail. Yes, if someone does not have a good alibi, it could signify that they are guilty. Although Adnan’s alibi was weak, it was weak because when they interrogated him it was the middle of the night and was taken right out of bed.
S could be a possible suspect in the murder of Hae, Adnan loved Hae and he wouldn’t that upset to just go kill her, and Jay kept changing his alibi about what happened. Even Jay is saying that he found Hae’s body in the back of Adnan’s car, Adnan is ultimately innocent because Jay could have took part in the crime somehow and he could be possibly covering something up. What I learned most from this project is that people can’t trust everyone. They can stab them in the back or make up lies but all the lying and false accusations can make people be involved in crimes or tough situations. From what had happened to Adnan, readers can tell that Adnan couldn’t trust Jay because he was telling wrong information the
These two reasons are all that a person should need to believe that Adnan didn't have enough motive, or time, to kill Hae. Jays testimony sets the timeline and proves there is enough evidence, which is not presented by Adnan’s lawyer, to say Adnan is innocent by a straying story. The time period where Hae could've been killed does not match Adnan’s timeline. Jay, who is a convicted felon, was the only witness and is trusted to give a good story. Cristina Gutierrez, who was Adnan’s lawyer, had medical issues that distracted her from using useful information in his case.
However, the beginning ends with detectives interviewing Jay, an acquaintance of Adnan, who claims that Adnan repeatedly spoke about murdering Hae, and called him when he had supposedly
She states “A year after Adnan was arrested and the case came to trial, Jay walked up to the witness stand. There’s a moment when Adnan muttered something to him” (45). By Adnan calling Jay pathetic he showed that he couldn’t believe Jay would rat him out. This incident shows that Adnan is a liar and is mad at Jay for going to the police, showing that he is guilty. Even after controlling himself through the whole case he snapped when he saw the man that betrayed him.