Food is a very large topic to talk about. There is a lot of information involving nutrients and sugars. Sugar is a very large problem in our society because it can cause harm and we should make all school lunches healthy. Some studies show that Americans are cutting back on sweets, but this is wrong. This is wrong because many articles including “Danger in Desserts?” says it’s rising by an astonishing 50%. The reason it’s rising is because there are a ton of new foods that are loaded with sugar. People still eat these sugar loaded foods because the sugar is really hidden within these foods really well. In addition, sugar is very difficult to cut back on because it is addictive and delicious. In conclusion, the studies of American sugar habits that are going down are wrong by a long ways. …show more content…
She has spent many years trying to make school lunches healthier. After half of a decade, republicans finally agreed with her to make school lunches more healthy. Many people say that they like unhealthy school lunches better, but this is wrong because everyone like unhealthy school lunches on the way they taste, but it is more important about how healthy they are. Obesity rates would shoot through the roof if all of the school lunches were unhealthy. I see why they think this (Because it tastes better), but it is about the kids health. If a school has unhealthy lunch, the kids might be happy for the time, but their life won’t be happy in the future when they grow up to be obese. All of this information proves that schools are a lot healthier now and they should keep it this way for many years to come. This healthy food also gives kids enough energy to get through the day. If they eat unhealthy lunches they won't have enough energy to make it through the day so they won't learn as much as they could if they eat healthy school lunches. In the end, schools are better off with healthy foods rather than unhealthy foods for many
If I were to change one thing in my community, I would change the school lunches, because they taste horrendous, and they need to be healthier. First, the lunches should not be processed foods because those use a lot of chemicals that are harmful to the body. Some examples of processed foods are foods that come pre made or from a box or a can. Processed foods usually contain more con syrup and sugars, usually addicting and can make you gain weight,contains many artificial ingredients, high in carbohydrates, and uses lots of oils that are usually processed as well.
Ariana Cha combats a seriously pressing topic in her writing. While many articles are very quick to bash the school lunch program, while this article can enforce it. Cha is supporting the most common argument with the school lunch program, nutritional content. Cha is stating that the nutrients are offered, but are not being accepted by the students. The audience intended for this reading is, literally, anybody that disagrees with the provided meals.
(Pollan 197-198) Eating locally sustained food provides not only multiple health benefits to our bodies such as vitamins and minerals, but the animals are also eating what they were meant to which allows for a healthier cow, therefore a healthier meal we eat. Although most schools do try to offer healthier options, kids do not have to take them and would rather take the chip bag sitting next to the apple, for instance, “Schools must offer dairy, grains, fruits, and vegetables, but there are no programs to make sure that children are eating them.... Unhealthy foods usually lack the nutrients that children need to stay energized and focus throughout the rest of the day.
It will give students the ability to get rid of the risk of having an unhealthy lunch at school. Although it can make students lose weight, it won't help because those options are already there. Schools already have options like salads or fat free milk that are there for the student to choose. Changing the school lunches can also have an impact on what students eat at home by letting them adapt to the new foods. Changing the lunches will not let them adapt to the new food.
Healthier lunches would help control kids weight because over the years obesity has grew in the population of kids and adults. Public schools in the United States has gone to health foods to control the weight of people in the population. Eating healthy is a good thing but I don’t think students should force someone to do that. With healthy lunches students will pack their lunch more ,and it will cost the schools money.
A recent study found that children who regularly ateschool lunches were 29 percent more likely to beobese than their peers who brought lunch fromhome. Health science has advanced greatly since theinception of the National School Lunch Program in1946. When a 2008 Institute of Medicine committeecomprising 14 child-nutrition experts examined dataon the content of school lunches in the UnitedStates, its findings were stark. The updated standards aligned school meals withthe 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans byincreasing quantities of fruits, vegetables, andwhole grains; establishing calorie ranges; andlimiting trans fats and sodium. Children consume almost half of their total caloriesat school, and the National School Lunch Programprovides
As I walked into the cafeteria, I caught a whiff of the food being prepared in the cafeteria and thought to myself, “Why can’t we go off-campus to get lunch?” While SLA, the lunch program at Catholic High, provides the school lunches, there could be an alternative solution to this. Unfortunately, students are detained at school during lunch hours and are not able to leave campus during lunch forcing them to be served by SLA or bring their own lunch. If Catholic High School were to introduce an open-campus lunch, students and faculty would benefit greatly. While SLA does provide the lunch at CHS, they do not live up to their standard of “high quality, nutritious, and cost efficient”.
Are School Lunches Really Healthy For You? Imagine going to school and thinking, oh boy what am I going to have for lunch today? And all of the sudden you see something you don’t like, so you don’t eat it and then your stomach starts to growl.
Although changing the lunch menu would be better for students, it has a lot of conflicts. For one, healthier lunch choices would be much more costly. If schools pay more for lunches, then they would have to cut back on other things. Another concern is that most students do not like to eat healthy and would not appreciate what the school is
Determining the healthiness of food being served to students during school lunches is a very important subject. Although eating healthy is important it should not be the only factor contributing to whether or not taking away students favorite school lunches is beneficial. I don't believe that it is a good idea to take away students favorite school lunches and replacing them with all healthy foods is a good idea because of these three reasons. One, the cost of the healthier food, two, the student environment and mood of the school, and three, the fairness to the students whose only meal is the lunch they receive at school.
In the article, “Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough?” by Rice William, the author question whether our school lunches are healthy enough. He discusses the Hunger-Free Kids Act, a campaign originated from first lady, Michelle Obama, in 2010 to help fight childhood obesity, which affects 1 in 3 Americans . It can escalate into diabetes and heart disease, which can make a childs life worse and cost the nation millions.
Why School Lunch Regulations Should be Reduced Yuck: A 4th Grader’s Short Documentary About School Lunch- An interesting story about Zachary Maxwell, who filmed his school lunches while comparing them to the menus the schools gave out to parents. The results alone found in the documentary were amazing. It caused change in the entire state, and an inspection of the school’s lunches. The documentary was made over the 2011-2012 school year.
“Today approximately 16% of America 's youth are classified as obese,” in that case, changing one meal a day could prevent as much as 6% of America’s youth from becoming obese. The main issue in the cause to start making school lunch the healthy option of a students day is the undeniable fact; people love debilitating foods. Even when you are an infant in the womb, the one, only thing you crave is sugar. The best
Action must be taken by the food industry in order to start eliminating the problems that are causing the society to deteriorate. There are countless health issues within America that continue to grow due to the fact that the food industry is not regulating the food being provided and sole enough. Obesity and being overweight are one of the many social issues that can be linked back to the food industry. While it is true that there are cases of obesity and being overweight due to lack of exercise or genetics, it is primarily the food that cause people to gain excess weight. So many foods nowadays contain surplus amounts of calories, fats, and sugar which have a direct correlation to weight gain.
Imagine a school that has multiple healthy school food options, that is worth standing in line for. I think that all schools should have a healthy school lunch. It's very important to have nutritious school lunches so that we can be healthy and have energy during the school day. I think we should have better and healthier school menus. Our school menus are very high in cholesterol and saturated fat.