ipl-logo

Essay On Sectionalism

879 Words4 Pages

The definition of sectionalism is being loyal to one’s own region or area of the nation rather than the nation as a whole. Regional differences that went on for years were a big cause of the civil war in the United States, sectionalism being a big one. There was a division because of certain political, economic and social issues, all of those things were what contributed to the growth of sectionalism from 1800-1861, when the civil war started.
The North and the South had completely different views especially when it came to the topic of slavery. The economies were running different and the laws were placed using their different views. The Sought was pro slavery and the North was anti-slavery. They didn’t want any slaves in their section but …show more content…

The first compromise was in 1820 call the Missouri Compromise. The debate was where slavery would be allowed to take place. The Northwest Ordinance was the Northwest territory created beyond the Appalachian Mountains, this action was a responds to many differ things such as war. Then the compromise was that Missouri enter as a slave stated and Maine enter as a free state and the line of 36' 30" is the line that separates slavery everything above it is free and everything below it was a slave state. The Missouri compromise was effective for almost thirty years until similar problems arose and the compromise became less and less effective. Then the Compromise of 1850 occurred which admitted California as a free state and Utah and New Mexico as a territory toward the west based on popular sovereignty, a doctrine asserting the right of the people living in a newly organized territory to decide by vote of their territorial legislature whether or not slavery would be permitted there. Then the Kansas Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri compromise back in 1820 and entered Kansas and Nebraska as territories by popular sovereignty. After The Kansas Nebraska Act in 1854 the Annexation of Texas came about. The United States added Texas on to the map despite all their debt and the controversy it cased with other states, to get Texas away from Mexico and to have their independence. Then the Abolitionist

Show More
Related

  • Southern States Rights Dbq Essay

    136 Words  | 1 Pages

    While the North tried to stop the South from withdrawing their spot in the Union, the North also denied the Southern states rights. Sectional groups assembled in the North regarding the “unnatural feeling and hostility” to slavery in the South. “ By consolidating their strength, they have placed the strength... no avail in protecting Southern rights (Document I). The Northerners believed that slavery is not right, and also that “the demand of African slavery throughout the confederacy” is unheard of.

    Read More

  • Sectionalism In Both The North And South Dbq

    262 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sectionalism was a leading contributor to America’s inability to reach compromise. The North and South possessed passionate political views that differed immensely. Both the Northern and Southern states felt unheard and unconsidered. The reannexation of Texas proved to be pivotal in how close America came to going to fill out war then. Northerners were willing to take Texas as she was, sought not to change the character of her institutions and realized that slavery existed in Texas.

    Read More

  • Dbq Missouri Compromise

    595 Words  | 3 Pages

    Leslie Chihuahua United States History to 1877 11/13/2015 11:00-11:50 AM Missouri Compromise was an agreement from the House of Representatives to reach a median to keep slavery out of Missouri after all the tribulations it had caused before it became a state. Henry Clay, Speaker of the House made important decisions in order for Missouri to be admitted as a state that could impact American history. In 1819, slavery was a resourceful profit to slave owners and this sparked a sectional controversy in the country over the efforts to expand slavery into the new western territories. The country had 22 states, eleven free eleven slave, and the line between them were distinguished by the northern and western boundaries of Pennsylvania and the Ohio River. (Txt.

    Read More

  • Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

    Read More

  • Manifest Destiny: Nineteenth Century Concept Of American Expansion

    1064 Words  | 5 Pages

    The North, wanting to limit slavery to the South where it currently existed and eventually abolish the labor system all together, were hesitant to allow the formation of large territories in the Southwest. The South had a fierce ambition to expand slavery into the Southwest, and the concept of Manifest Destiny played right along with their beliefs and motivation to do so. Whenever new territories were added, the North and South would begin a process to decide the fate of the newly established territories, which would lead to many compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820, The Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. All of these compromises would solve the immediate territorial disputes, but was just delaying the inevitable conflict that would become the Civil

    Read More

  • Political Compromises Leading Up To The Civil War

    700 Words  | 3 Pages

    These compromises were very unpopular, especially in the south where pro-slavery politicians felt that their states were on the loosing end of these compromises. The first of these compromises was the Missouri Compromise which allowed Missouri to be admitted as a slave state while Maine was admitted as a free state. This compromise set a precedent that continued to be followed in which the number of new free states and new slave states was balanced. This compromise ensured that power in the senate would be balanced between free and slave states and would prevent either side from gaining the upper hand in the legislature. While this was a good idea in practice it created political gridlock and the compromise was effectively repealed in 1854 by the Kansas-Nebraska act which was the catalyst for the armed conflict fought over slavery known as Bleeding Kansas.

    Read More

  • Nationalism And Sectionalism During The Era Of Good Feelings

    1341 Words  | 6 Pages

    Nationalism and sectionalism were two powerful influences in the development of American policies and economy during the Era of Good Feelings. It is faulty to say that one was greater than the other because these two mindsets are symbiotic with one another. An increased sense of pride, nationalism, inevitably leads into developing a sense of sectionalism. The idea of nationalism, feeling that one’s country was superior to others, coincides soundly with the concept of sectionalism, where individuals view countries with an in-group and out-group mindset, or basically: “it’s us against them.” In many ways, nationalism and sectionalism are really one in the same due to the fact that during the Era of Good Feelings, Americans viewed their country

    Read More

  • What Was The Actual Compromise Of 1850

    1866 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Actual Compromise The actual compromise had multiple provisions. The Compromise of 1850 called for the admission of California as a free state; the strengthening of the Fugitive Slave Law; popular sovereignty in Utah and New Mexico concerning the question of slavery; the abolition of the slave trade in D.C.; and the federal assumption of Texas’s debt.   The first one we will discuss is how Texas would have to surrender control of land in exchange for ten million dollars.

    Read More

  • The Civil War: The Compromise Of 1850

    1069 Words  | 5 Pages

    The compromise was for the state to pay all of the debt while Texas let Mexico become a territory. California on the other hand was building up with growth in their population due to the gold rush the previous year. A state convention adopted an antislavery state in late 1849. They later applied for acceptance into the union as a free

    Read More

  • America Was A Phrase Attributed To President Monroe And Elaborated By John Quincy Adams

    1453 Words  | 6 Pages

    They were divided because they do not share the same ideas, the states in the north was not agree with the slavery and the states in the south, states that base their economy in primary activities like agriculture were agree on have slaves and they do not want to allowed to change that situations, but they were agree in one thing they know that they have to stay together in order to be a successful nation and contain the European powers they need to find a way to construct an empire even if they did not think the

    Read More

  • How Did Western Expansion Affect The Sectional Tension Between 1800 And 1850

    473 Words  | 2 Pages

    Between 1800 and 1850, western expansion played a major role in the sectional tensions between the North and South in America. Most of this would stem from whether or not new territory would be free or slave states. Later on, there would be compromises in place to alleviate the tension but disunity between the North and South was very prevalent. In 1803, the Louisiana Purchase from the French got a rise out of the New England Federalist party.

    Read More

  • Sectionalism In The 1800s

    270 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sectionalism The definition of the word sectionalism is the restriction of interest to a narrow sphere. There were 3 main sections that practiced sectionalism in the 1800s. These sections were the North, the South, and the West. A few events that created sectional conflict were tariffs, slavery, representation, and states rights.

    Read More

  • How Did Native Americans Affect Manifest Destiny

    939 Words  | 4 Pages

    The north and the south had always had disagreements but they became more serious as manifest destiny settled in. In document 9 it says “Prior to manifest destiny and the expansion west the politics and economics concerned only the Northern and Southern states. The North had industrialized and in the process changing the way things were made from hand and home-made to machine and factory made. The South was agrarian and a large grower of cotton. With the invention of the cotton gin in 1793 and invention of textile machinery, it created a need for a greater labor force increasing the slave trade in the south.

    Read More

  • Essay On What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    484 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the North slavery wasn't practiced. The economy of the North was mainly dependent on industry. The North depended on the South for

    Read More

  • What Was The Missouri Compromise

    261 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise greatly limited the growth and development of slavery in the United States. It allowed Missouri to become a state, and to allow slaves, and Maine, as a free state. The compromise also prohibited the practice of slavery in the northern portion of the Louisiana Territory. By this time, the importation of slaves from Africa had been outlawed, and they could only be purchased within the country. This meant also meant, that states that entered would be free states.

    Read More

More about Essay On Sectionalism

Open Document