If players had to stay for two years the quality of basketball the quality of basketball would undoubtedly be better. Yes, players want to get to the next level as fast as they can, but but if they had to stay for two years instead of one, college basketball would even more fun to watch. Imagine that Brandon Ingram was staying for his sophomore year, and Harry Giles is playing at Duke his Freshman year. They would be so fun to watch, and they would not be the only team like that. It would be fun watching these players grow individually and as a team. College basketball would never bet the same, it would be on a new level. The teams would be so much more talented. If Kyrie Irving stayed one more year he would have been playing with Austin Rivers …show more content…
All of these players are wanting to go straight to the NBA for the money, but if they just stay one year more year more,their draft stock could go up and they could get more money their first few years and it could even out. Quite a few players would also benefited to staying one more year because they have rookie struggles, and one more year of collegiate basketball could have helped these players work on their game before going to the next level. Finally, basketball would be on a new level. The fans would want to come and watch the games live, and they would want to watch it on television so the television rating would go up. Next, say that Brandon Ingram stayed for one more year and played with Duke’s new recruiting class. He would be playing with Harry Giles, Jayson Tatum, and since Greyson Allen is staying for his junior year. They would be one of the most dynamic basketball teams of the decade. Talking about Greyson Allen he did it right, his freshman year he averaged four point four points per game, and sophomore year he led the team in scoring and averaged twenty-one point six points per game. That is a seventeen point two more point per game then the year
If they are getting ready to go to the next level with their talents, why not pay them for their talents while their in college and get them ready for the quite large amount of money that will be paid to them once on a National Football League roster? According to the article Football: College (1990’s) Some great players passed through the ranks of college football during the decade, despite many early defections to the professional ranks as National Football League (NFL) teams offered huge signing bonuses to the most skilled players. The most skilled players in college make it to the next level in the pro’s, and the most skilled players of that group get drafted in the top rounds of the draft coming out of college. Thus, these young people who are often inexperienced with money, and irresponsible with it, are about to be handed millions at around the ages of 20-24 most of the time.
Getting paid in college would help teach these players some responsibility before they are rewarded a big NFL/NBA contract. Players could make just enough money to be forced to make choices that can pave the way for more responsible decision making when the financial stakes become high. Many players will learn the value of money and the responsibility that comes from holding down a job. College football player’s should get paid to play because these players put themselves at risk for injury, college football is a job, not p.e, and it will help players adjust to college socially and economically. Colleges and the NCAA can make money selling jerseys and other souvenirs that might include the likeness of players, yet the actual players never receive a
Colleges willing to pay for their players could attract talented athletes. Students may want to go out for a sport if they know they will be paid, which could also bring talent to the field or court. With new talent, teams could win more and earn more recognition. This would benefit the players, coach and
When they play more games they miss out on even more school work with more and more practices and more risks of getting injured. One might say that the money is a distraction from school, and their team. However they are thinking incorrectly, just to get into Michigan you must have a 3.8 GPA on a 4.0 grade scale just to get in. With these athletes having to keep a high GPA they don’t have time to focus on money instead of classes, otherwise they might not even be going to that school anymore. There are those who think that college athletes shouldn’t get paid for playing in games, but there are those who do think so.
According to Fox Sports, this has been a law for at least 10 years. If a player gets fresh out of high school and then has to wait for 3 years, then that player is probably going to lose his/her talent with a sport. Also, people say that college is to much money. A basic degree in college is about $200,000. Most people don’t have that kind of money, making them in debt.
How will they pay them, will it be fair? Each player should get the same amount of money not that much but a enough to get by. In conclusion, College basketball players should take the right steps with money. College basketball athletes should be paid because they put their bodies at risk at risk, they also don’t have money, and they skip classes.
One of the most talked about issues to arise from the National Basketball Association is the number of high school basketball players skipping college to go straight to the NBA. The media and critics have been reporting on the troubles of this situation, since Kevin Garnett made skipping college for the big bucks a yearly tradition in 1995 (Abrahams). The number of high school teenagers entering the league has grown every year since Garnett, was the only one in 1995. Fans, the media, and critics alike have mixed opinions on the subject. Some feel that bringing in these younger players will make the league more exciting, others feel that most of these youngplayers are making a mistake and should go to college.
A quantity of high school athletes have succeeded and a majority of them have not. The issue concerning the NCAA athletes is that they are not being paid to play in these tournaments and games. They are not being paid to win, and to move on to play numerous other teams. With countless new players, the NCAA would have to pay the athletes different amounts of money depending on how long the athletes were on the teams.
Already, the system of college athletics is corrupt. People see that all this money is being made and the college athletes are completely getting
To players more money is just more money. It is not like they are going to get money and quit. They want to keep working and keep getting huge paychecks while doing something that they love. Money problems show in college too. Coaches want the best for their team and some will give anything for them.
Life for college football coaches and NFL coaches would change forever if the three year rule was lifted or modified. Maybe it will change for the better, but I understand why these coaches are scared of losing their players straight to the NFL. Football is dangerous and if the athletes do get injured enough that they can no longer come back to the NFL, having that college education will help them return to school, finish, and get a new good paying job. So the rules should not be lifted completely, but modified to fix everyones concerns and
Ken Shropshire states in his journal that,” A select few manage to continue their education after signing pro contracts at an early age” (57). Kobe Bryant is just one example of this. Kobe went to University of California in Los Angeles to continue his education even when he was playing professional basketball (Shropshire). If a player is good enough, then he should go to the NBA right
An important discourse community that was a part of my life was my volleyball team during my four years of high school. I started playing my first year going into high school and continued until I graduated. Until now I wasn’t even aware that would even be considered a discourse community, but it fits all of the qualifications of Swales’ definition of a discourse community. Goals
Did you know that in March Madness (one of the biggest tournaments for college basketball) that there are over 9 million dollars spent on just betting. No commercials or anything, just betting. College basketball is so much more interesting than NBA basketball, but in the NBA the stadiums are bigger so more people come. People don't realize how lazy players are in the NBA. College basketball is so much more interesting than NBA because they try harder in games, they rebound, which leads to big things, and there has been more money spent on March Madness than any other tournament in college basketball.
People say that NBA players don’t need college and people say they need college to be eligible for the NBA. I really think players need 2-4 years of college; people don’t look at the grand scheme of things and realize there so many ideas to why players should go to college before NBA. On the other people have other ideas of why players need college before NBA. Some sports fans don’t care how great college is for a player. College gives the player a lot of opportunities and many things to succeed in.