Aaron Burr and Thomas Jefferson fighting for that one spot, to be the next President of the United States of America. It’s up to the people to show who they want. But it isn’t just the people who determine the winner. The electoral college allows each state to vote and whoever wins the most states is determined as President of the United States. This system also states that a smaller group of people, known as representatives, chosen for the Americans. The electoral college can either be abolished or changed. With it being abolished all the power would go straight the American citizens, if changed it will allow the smaller states to have a say. By changing the electoral college system it will allow representatives of the people, smaller states …show more content…
Most candidates in the race have to win certain states because of how big they are. But if the electoral college were to be abolished these smaller states would not really matter in the election at all. The number of electors must be “equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives” (Document 2). Since these two types of committees are based on the population it must be equal, not less or more. This system also allowed Washington DC to have three electoral votes, it is a system that lets these little states to have a vote. In both documents two and four it explains how the electoral system supports the smaller states. It allows them to have a voice in a …show more content…
With the vote directly to the people it eliminates the idea of a bandwagon. A bandwagon makes people join something because of popular belief it happens a lot now because of social media. Without representatives to persuade the state’s vote it gives people to the choice to choose who they want. On document seven it shows how the 2016 election should’ve gone out, the people’s votes are being persuaded because of the people representing them. Only the majority vote really matters. Having each individual vote count can allow more voting diversity and more voters coming to polls to vote. Another thing that could benefit from this not having a tie vote or a third party coming in and voting eliminating the people’s vote. In document six it talks about the 2000 election, the U.S. Supreme Court had to come in and make the final decision. The ruling stated that “lawsuits escalated the to U.S. Supreme Court where the final, 5-4 decision was made” (Document 6). This ruling left the decision on nine justices, that took away the vote of the people of Florida.Giving back the power of the people will solve many debating issues in the election system. Take away the majority and give back the power to the individual
Short Essay: The Electoral College was constructed in the 1700s in which it was a process that ensured that election of the President of the United States was fair and not chaotic. It consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by Congress. Many people disagree with the system of the Electoral College being an impact when determining the President of the United States.
The Electoral College has caused numerous problems in the past and have consequently changed the outcomes of numerous elections including the elections of 1800 (Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Aaron Burr), 1824 (John Quincy Adams, Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay and William H. Crawford), 1876 (Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden), 1888, (Grover Cleveland and Benjamin Harrison), and 2000 (George W. Bush and Al Gore). throughout these elections the same catastrophe has occurred; The winner of the popular vote did not receive the presidency due to the Electoral College votes. In addition to the problems, there have been multiple close calls, for the example the elections of 1968 and 1976. While many analysts of American politics have come to
One reason that the framers of the constitution included the Electoral College is because they believed people will only vote for people in their own states and basically play favorites. However, in modern democracy it is evident that this system no longer benefits entirely the people of the states’. It must be modified because the restrictions that vary state to state through each election is now unnecessary in today’s society. In a presidential election an electoral vote should count the same as a popular vote no matter the circumstances. The states that remain mutual in a presidential candidacy election, where the populations are evenly divided causes an issue of winning the state
The Electoral College system is a long process but a fair system. The theory behind this system is to ensure that all of the states, even the small ones, receive a fair voice in the election. In doing so, this will assist in the election process. Electoral College is defined as, “an unofficial term that refers to the electors who cast the states’ electoral votes” (Patterson, T.E., 2013, p.514).
First you decide which candidate you will vote for. Then you just see as the voting goes on in your state and see how many electoral votes will choose the future president. Trent England proclaimed, "The people vote to determine how their state will cast its electoral votes. The candidate with a majority of those electoral votes becomes president. It isn't really that complicated, and it certainly isn't undemocratic.
If we somehow happened to be a capable vote, then we ought to have the capacity to really pick who might be president. The Electoral College removes that from us. The Electoral College is not by any stretch of the imagination reasonable for our rights and our opportunity. It, for the most part, takes away the ability to vote the president. The Electoral College was made in a period when votes were harder to gather and number.
The President is chosen from a group of electors which are picked from the states. Each state gets an elector for every member that state has in congress. The presidential Candidate who receives the state's most popular votes receives electoral votes. The framers were afraid of the public being manipulated by a tyrant and wanted to prevent them from coming to power. (Patterson, 2015, p. 378.)
Debate has arisen on whether this system should still be used to elect a president after the election of Donald Trump. The Electoral College should be preserved since it represents all states fairly, and exemplifies efficiency. Firstly, states are represented evenly through the Electoral College. In the article “Should the United States Keep or Abandon the
Electoral College Essay The Electoral College system used in the United States to elect the President was created to make voting a smoother process when the country was first founded. At the time, the fastest way to transport people’s votes was by horseback. To speed up the voting process, U.S. leaders devised the Electoral College system, so the electors who represented each state could keep each other updated without the delay of travel. In today’s world, we have the Internet.
The electoral college also helps the small states have an opinion that actually is heard in the presidential election. In class, it was discussed that Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota together, though their combined population is less than that of Oklahoma, each of those states has three electoral votes, whereas Oklahoma just has seven votes. Going by electoral votes, a candidate would have a better chance at winning the election if they won over Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota versus Oklahoma. With the electoral college, a candidate could win over all thirty-nine small states and win the entire election. Though the candidate could be supported by less than a quarter of the population,
In Document D, we are shown an example in which we can visually see how one citizens vote weighs more heavily than others depending on the state. While Illinois has a larger population than all twelve states and D.C. depicted
The Electoral College is the process to which the United States elects the President, and the Vice President. The founders of the Constitution came up with this process. This was done to give additional power to the small states, and it was done to satisfy them. It works by the citizens of the United States electing representatives called electors. Each state is given the same amount of electors, as they are members of congress.
The Votes that Should Count The United States should abolish the Electoral College, by amending the Constitution, and use the Direct Popular Vote process for presidential elections. Though the U.S. Constitution Article two, section one, clause two states that the appointment of electors belong exclusively to the states (National Conference of State Legislator), it is seemingly pointless to carry out national voting polls of the public if only electoral college votes will hold the count for the next elected president. Every three years around the United States, candidates who decide to run for the seat of presidency begin their campaign to win the votes of Americans, but for what?
Along with keeping balance between the states, the Electoral College also helps keep independent parties under
Electoral college has been with us since the birth of the constitution, and to this day we are still using this type of system to this day. The Electoral College is a system that the United States uses to elect our upcoming presidents and vice presidents. Each state has electors equal to their senate member and house of representatives, however who ever gets the highest popular vote in the state gets the electoral vote. The issue is the Electoral College do not give votes to the people, but to the states. Which has some unfair consequences.