The framers at the Constitution Convention believed that the president should be indirectly voted for. The framers thought the citizens were not smart enough and were uninformed to be able to elect their own leader. They knew their leader had to be chosen in an informed process that would consider the desires of every citizen without giving away too much power to one group. The delegates did not trust that the voters had enough information to be able to vote on their own. This lead to the creation of the Electoral College. With the Electoral College system each state is given a certain number of electors based on that state's population. Each state has at least three electors. When citizens vote they are really just voting for the slate of …show more content…
"A candidate can win an election with just two hundred and seventy electoral votes" (Document A). This means that a candidate could potentially win an election by just persuading eleven out of the fifty-five states. The number of electors in each state is decided by the number that that state has in The House of Representatives and Senate combined. This causes more power/weight to be given to the smaller states, making states such as Alaska, with a population of 710,231 and Wyoming, with a population of 563,626 equal regardless of their population differences with both states having three electoral votes (Document A). A candidate could potentially become president by just winning over the small states because that it where the most electoral votes are (Document A). This system allows the possibility of a president who is not favored by the majority to be …show more content…
"The election would be thrown to the House of Representatives, where state delegates vote on the president" (Document F). A tie happened in 1800 between Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr. In 1824, Jackson won the popular and the electoral vote, however Adams won that election (Document G). For that particular election the House of Representative chose the president. This proves that the House, like the Electoral College, don't always vote what the people want. In the event of a tie all the power goes to the House of Representatives. When the House of Representatives decides who the president will be it is even less fair than the electoral votes. "Each state casts only one vote, the single representative from Wyoming, representing 500,000 voters, would have as much say as the 55 representatives from California, who represent 35 million voters" (Document F). It is unjust to make each state have the same amount of say because of the larger population differences. It is also unfair because that one person that represents your state might not vote with the way the majority voted. This is
The smaller states rule the elections because they have the most power. “The states with the most electoral votes in California with 55, and Texas with 38” (Document A), which isn’t fair with some smaller states having only 3. Also each state doesn’t have the equal amount of votes, and the smaller states have more power behind their votes. “Each state casts only one vote, the single representative from Wyoming,
The year a new president must be chosen is always a time of tension in the United States. Hopeful candidates run for president, and citizens start swearing their allegiance to a candidate and party. The GOP and DNC start grooming the candidates they wish to have as president while independent candidates are just trying to get their names in the news. One of the topics that is always criticized and defended around the time of the presidential elections is always the Electoral College. One side say it is undemocratic and unfair, and the other side says that it is a pillar of the United States government.
The existence of the Electoral College has remained a source of debate for the population of the United States for centuries. Despite the evident discontent surrounding it, the United States is largely unaware of the disconnect between citizens’ voices and the Presidency. It can be said that popular sovereignty, no matter how pleasant a concept, has become little more than an illusion the people cling to. In short, the Electoral College is an institution that must be abolished, because it violates political equality, is unfair to third party candidates, and is not an accurate representation of the people’s votes.
Those states have high electoral votes because of their population and more people to vote equals more power in the Electoral College. This systems allows a group of districts to decide in a group effort to give their power of choice to the right leader for this
The battle for the Electoral College vote is usually a tough one and it reflects upon a supposed popular majority. The reason it’s difficult is because often times less populated states are over-represented in the winner-take-all type of situation, when they win the Electoral College the chances of them winning the election for President skyrockets. However, if there is a tie the House of Representatives will chose who is best based upon the top three candidates.
The amount of influence a state has on the election depends on how many districts it has, and a district is determined by population. The more people in a state the more powerful that state is on election day. This is because one candidate can win the popular vote by a landslide but if the opposing candidate wins key overall state votes he or she would win. Many people do not agree with the way the United States elects the president. Some believe it should be abolished
Currently, the electoral voters are the only ones with a direct vote in the election. In order for the election to be more reflective of the citizens’ wishes, the popular vote should become more significantly tied to the election. The Electoral College should not be the most prominent voting process, when the popular vote should be more important. The risk of untrustworthy electors increases, which causes the voter to feel that they are being cheated out of their votes, which may discourage them from voting in the future. There is also the high possibility in which neither candidates receive the majority of electoral votes required to win election, such as what occurred in the 1824 election, meaning the House of Representatives would have to decide who becomes
This is called the electoral college. The electoral college allows people to vote for electors, who then vote for the president. They meet every presidential election, usually
The people who live in Wyoming, Vermont, and Rhode Island all have a heavier hand in the election due to their low population, this is unfair because although the point of the Electoral College is to keep power out of any one person’s hands, it is not fairly dispersing power to the people within the different states. According to Chris Derosa, he too believes this, “The first problem with the Electoral College is that it gives more weight to voters in small states than those in more populous ones, says DeRosa,” (Nuemann). Yes, the point of the Electoral College is to keep the fate of the election out of any one man’s hands, and it still does that; this is exactly why citizens have voted for themselves for 200 years. The population might be smaller in these states but think about the uses of their land; Wyoming’s unpopulated land is used for mineral refining and national forests and parks. Vermont’s land is used for forestry that allows people to build homes across the country, North Dakota’s unpopulated land is mainly used for agriculture.
A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. Your State has the same number of electors as it does Members in its Congressional delegation: one for each Member in the House of Representatives plus two Senators.” (National Archives) Despite the criticisms that the system has received, it is still important that we maintain the Electoral College system for multiple reasons.
First, with the specifications of the electoral college there only needs to be 270 electoral votes to a person for them to win. With this rule only 12 states need to be won CA, TX, FL, NY, IL, PA, OH, MI, GA, NC, and NJ(DOC A) and this is only a part of the overall population of America. While
The electoral college also helps the small states have an opinion that actually is heard in the presidential election. In class, it was discussed that Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota together, though their combined population is less than that of Oklahoma, each of those states has three electoral votes, whereas Oklahoma just has seven votes. Going by electoral votes, a candidate would have a better chance at winning the election if they won over Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota versus Oklahoma. With the electoral college, a candidate could win over all thirty-nine small states and win the entire election. Though the candidate could be supported by less than a quarter of the population,
Each state has a different number of electors, based on the number of representatives they have in Congress, which is based on population. I.e. Alabama has
The Electoral College is the process to which the United States elects the President, and the Vice President. The founders of the Constitution came up with this process. This was done to give additional power to the small states, and it was done to satisfy them. It works by the citizens of the United States electing representatives called electors. Each state is given the same amount of electors, as they are members of congress.
Several years after the United States came to be, the Constitutional Convention met to determine how the new nation should govern itself. The delegates saw that it was crucial to have a president and vice president, but the delegates did not want these offices to reflect how the colonies were treated under the British rule. The delegates believed that the president’s power should be limited, and that he should be chosen through the system known as the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the electing of the president and vice president. Many citizens feel that the Electoral College goes against our nation’s principle of representative democracy, while others