“The Electoral College is a disaster for a democracy.” Donald Trump, the forty-fifth President of the United States who ironically won from the votes of the Electoral College, declares that this unpatriotic system hinders the people from choosing their president. A “disaster” for the American system, the Electoral College displays an authoritarian structure, giving citizens little to no choice of their leader. Since a president was not chosen by the majority vote in 1824, there has been heated debate on whether or not to eliminate the Electoral College. The Electoral College was created in 1787 during the Constitutional Convention. The framers of the Constitution incorrectly believed that the people would abuse their power if they decided to …show more content…
Primarily, the Electoral College promotes a racial bias and gives more electoral weight to the Southern Republican states. Moreover, the popular vote system would enable third-party candidates to have a higher probability of becoming the president. However, several misguided Americans believe that the popular vote would not protect small states, but small states actually become ignored during presidential campaigns. Hence, the federal government’s elimination of the Electoral College would strengthen the representative government and the chances of third-party candidates, giving states and American citizens the power to choose their president as they …show more content…
Jerry Fresia, a former professor of political science, explains that if a popular third-party candidate runs for the presidency, such as Ross Perot in the 1992 election with twenty percent national support, the House of Representatives chose the president. The two dominant parties ruled the House anyway, so the chances of a third-party win became slim to none (Fresia). In that case when the Electoral College was split in their decision, the biased House chose the person to take office. The Electoral College still displays partiality and should be eliminated, because Republicans and Democrats control almost all government systems, the Electoral College included. The elimination of the Electoral College and the election of third-party candidates may bring real change to America. Furthermore, the Electoral College forces smaller parties to merge with one of the major parties, diluting their true cause. According to the aforementioned article, the People’s Party in 1896 had as high as forty-five percent support in over twenty states. However, they knew their candidate could not win the presidency because of the small amount of electoral votes for their supporting states in the Electoral College, so they hoped to unite with the Democrats rather than advocating for their own
In its favor, one may argue that it supports smaller states, creates more stability within the election due to the two-party system, and prevents the chances of recounting votes. However, the Electoral College is also believed to be “complicated” by cause of its unique representative system, persuade candidates into giving more attention to the smaller states, and be a magnet for faithless Electors, or Electors who decide to not vote for their party’s candidate (Veracity
The electoral college is unfair to the third party because they don’t get votes from the electoral college. Based on the presidential election from 1980 and 1992, it have show that the third party don’t get electoral vote(Doc B). The third party have a disadvantage which make it impossible for the third party to win the election because of the “winner take it all” system. According to George Will, he say that it discriminate smaller party and only help the main two parties(Doc E). The electoral college supports a two party system, discourages third party, and thereby restrict choices available to the
The first words in the Constitution are “We the people”, yet the Electoral College takes away power from the people to directly elect a President. To better understand the Electoral College, we will delve into the basics of the Electoral College and presidential elections, the pros and cons of the Electoral College in modern times, and a specific instance in which the Electoral College majorly affected the outcome of an election. The government should abolish the Electoral College, so United States citizens can directly elect whom they feel should head the Executive Branch. To begin, the Electoral College is a process, not an educational institution.
“In 1980 and 1992 the third party candidates received 6.6% and 18.9% of the popular vote but both received 0% of the Electoral Vote” (Document B). This is a significant difference of the popular vote and the electoral votes. It is not a correct representation of the citizens’ votes. Arthur Schlesinger wrote, “The abolition of state-by-state, winner-take-all electoral votes would speed the disintegration of the already weakened two-party system” (Document E). The Electoral College voters mostly belong to Republican and Democratic parties therefore they do not want a third party candidate to win.
The Electoral College When the Founding Fathers congregated and drafted the government of the newly-formed America, they wanted a system that would not produce a tyrant, but could also produce a strong executive that would lead and consider the people. They created a system in which power could be checked and with hope, incorruptible. Distributing political power into the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches, and an elaborate process to elect leaders in each, the American Constitution was a document revolutionary in its conception. There are irrefutable strengths of the Constitution, just as there are undeniable weaknesses, however both are huge influences on the shaping of our modern political arena. As discussed in this paper,
Throughout the years, there have been many qualms regarding the electoral college. Does the Electoral College properly represent the will of the American people? Is the electoral college an outdated system? Recently, these questions resurfaced as the election of 2016 resulted in the projection of Donald Trump triumphing over Hilary Clinton, even though Clinton received more popular votes at the end of the election. I believe that the Electoral College should be removed and changed to a more balanced system which reflects the needs and wants of each individual residing in America rather than society that does not account for the greater population of America in an old-fashioned system where the framers of the Constitution did not trust the American people to elect a leader worthy of the title.
The electoral college is the system that has been used to elect Presidents in the United States since the Constitution was established. However, there has been a debate that the electoral college should be abolished. (Claim) The Electoral College should be abolished and replaced with a direct popular vote. This system goes against the Constitution by undermining democracy, and the distribution of voting weight in states is extremely uneven.
The Electoral College was a part of the federal plan that our forefathers set for the American people. While it made a place for the stars, as well as the people living in them, by giving them a say in the Federal process and preventing bigger cities from taking over in the presidential election, opponents believe that this is not the case. Even after difficulties that the United States has been through, the states have control over a large number of laws, management, and finance which impact the lives of citizens. Each and every state has their own political cultures, ways of behaving and traditions that continue regardless of our short-term population, a connected economy and news media. The Electoral College was meant to be a way to solve the problems with one large state dominating over another small state based on the population.
As far as the two party system goes, eliminating the Electoral College would basically eliminate it, as well. Two parties cannot represent the needs of all citizens. Direct voting would benefit most voters who do not agree with everything the two parties represent. Again, this would encourage more people to vote. A) Over much of American history, especially more modern history, elections have exhibited the use of the two-party system.
Abolishing the electoral college will better the chances of voters having an equal say in who becomes
The Electoral College is a system that has been used to elect the president of the United States since the country’s founding. It is essentially groups of people called electors who cast votes for the president and vice president of the US. Each state has a slate of electors chosen by political parties. This system is prone to manipulation and fraud and takes away the meaning from the American people’s fundamental right to vote. For three reasons, the Electoral College should be abolished.
Although many have made their case against the Electoral College system, it is a necessary institution in the Presidential election because it preserves Federalism and encourages the two party system. One reason why the Electoral College is a necessary evil is because it secures the power of the states in the election, thereby upholding Federalism. As previously indicated, when citizens vote, they are voting for the amount of electors in their state to vote for their candidate of choice. The number of these electoral votes varies from state to state due to the fact that they are made up of the sum of its state’s Senators and House Representatives.
A sad truth comes to light as the results of a tight race for the next president starts to roll in. The truth is that the dysfunctional system that demonstrates the whole voting process takes the future of America 's leader, the one who will set many precedents and lessons for future generations to come, into the hands of former politicians and notable political figures, who take on the careless and unnecessary role of an elector. These electors are part of a voting system called the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a group of 538 people that are elected at state conventions to officially vote for the next presidential candidate based on each state 's popular vote. This structure is old and should be banned for several reasons.
Along with keeping balance between the states, the Electoral College also helps keep independent parties under
Electoral college has been with us since the birth of the constitution, and to this day we are still using this type of system to this day. The Electoral College is a system that the United States uses to elect our upcoming presidents and vice presidents. Each state has electors equal to their senate member and house of representatives, however who ever gets the highest popular vote in the state gets the electoral vote. The issue is the Electoral College do not give votes to the people, but to the states. Which has some unfair consequences.