Even though both ancient Rome and ancient Japan had advanced militaries. While they were quite different from one another, they both contributed to today’s military tactics. Some people would think that in Ancient times, they really don’t do anything compared to today’s military. But without some of the Ancient military ideas, we wouldn’t have some of the military equipment or similar weaponry that they had back then. Both ancient Rome and ancient Japan had advanced and well trained soldiers.They also created and used advanced weaponry for their time. In Ancient Rome, they used a lot of similar weaponry as Ancient Japan. Military strategies and tactics between civilizations varied significantly.
Ancient Rome had one of the largest armies in ancient times. Even though the Roman empire consisted between 45 million and 120 million people, the Roman military only consisted 3,750,000 people out of Rome. Some people thought that the Roman military were born ready for
…show more content…
The first way that the Roman military lined up their troops were that the calvary is up front, and on the sides where they can protect from flanks. In between them were two rows of five cohorts. The rightmost cohort consisted of ~1100 infantry and ~30 mounted troops, while others contained ~500 infantry and ~65 calvary.
The ancient Japanese and Roman military have both many similarities and differences in their military, strategies, tactics, and weaponry. One of the similarities between the two militaries were that they had a symbol that made them stand out from the other militaries. The difference between the two militaries were that ancient Japan didn’t have as many people as ancient Rome did. Another similarity that both civilizations had in their military were that some of their weaponry. Finally, another similarity that both civilizations had in their military were that they both were hard working
The Roman empire was one of the most powerful to ever exist and influenced all of Europe with their designs and battle strategies, even today Their impact is evident. The Romans changed European first century warfare forever with their superior army and tactics. The Romans were powerful due to the sheer number of soldiers they possessed, the equipment given to each soldier, and the training each member received to prepare for battle. Of course the Romans had innovations of their own but it was not above them to borrow techniques and styles from other cultures, like the Greeks for instance. The Romans also took equipment types from other European cultures as well, like plate armor.
Nihal Lalwani BBE 29 October 2014 8 History Essay Term 4 Assignment Tokugawa Japan (1600-1868) and Medieval Europe (590-1500) both grew in two separate sides of the world but both of them are similar in ways such as how they were run, their architecture, their warriors and the society. In discussing whether these two civilisations are similar, the research has led me to believe that these two civilisations are partly similar. There are many similarities between Japanese and Medieval European Castles such as what were they used for and how they worked. Medieval European Castles are similar to Japanese castles as they are used for similar reasons and architecture such as the castles had high walls for protection against arrows, both of them were used as outposts by respective lords of each civilisation (Friar, 2003. P.47).
To begin, the Shogunate’s were vastly superior in weaponry as they had guns, metal swords, bows and metal tipped spears. This meant that the shogunate warriors could attack from long range or fight close up. This is compared to the Polynesian, who used wooden spears, swords, axes, sling shoots or stone clubs. These weapons were less durable and the user would need to strike at such a powerful force to do the damage that the Shogunate weapons could
During this era, both the Han Empire and the Roman Empire rised above and proved they were the strongest and while having the most powerful empires. Although their methods of reaching the highest point in power they didn't both get there the same way but in many ways, they compare. Both empires believed in power vested in the wealthy which gave the mandate to control. The Han Empire and the Roman Empire shared similar political structures that centered around everything. Both empires shared the belief in religious practices, economic values, and social practices.
There are many uncanny similarities between the social and military features of Tokugawa Japan and those of medieval europe, considering they developed in isolation from one another. Japan and Europe have many differences There are many key features of Tokugawa Japan and Medieval Europe such as the structure, the weaponry and the strategies. The Middle ages started in the 500 AD and ended in the 1500 AD. Castles were made to defend and protect the king and everyone else who lived inside of it.
Soldiers began to fight through grueling and harsh conditions in battle without armor leaving them in a losing position. Roman soldiers without armor wouldn’t stand a chance against those who were skilled fighters and wore armor. In addition, in Document B, it stated,”Therefore, they first asked the emperor to set aside the breastplates...and then the helmets.” Based on this quote, Roman
Each regiment carried one eagle. The eagle was gravely important to the Roman military. Because it was not just a symbol of a legion but represented there values and futility. Losing a standard was considered a serious and terrible offense, the Roman military often went to great measures to protect a standard and to reclaim or recover it if lost. For example, after the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest, the Romans spent years trying to recover the lost flags of three regiments.
Curator Analysis - The Roman Gladius The superior weaponry possessed by the Roman army undoubtedly proved a contributor to their military overwhelming success. When used in conjunction with the Roman scutum (shield), the gladius was a highly efficient weapon in dispatching the enemies of Rome and breaking through enemy defences. Because of the highly drilled nature of the Roman army, specific strategies were developed for the gladius’ use and implemented with ruthless efficiency. The Roman soldiers were able to defend from attacks in ironclad formations, including the “wedge” and “tortoise”, then striking with quick motions as their opposition tired.
There are many similarities that can be noticed between the American Nation and the Roman Empire such as the same founding of government and both dominated in military, and economic similarities. Rome is famous for their harsh discipline amongst their own ranks and their mercifulness brutality amongst their enemies. Rome warfare was characterized by great ferocity and the roman pursuit of victory was determined. Rome gave many good ideas; the senate was ruled by the people of Rome. The Roman Republic Government was a large complex constitution, which was secure by many checks and balances, so that no man could have complete control.
The Samurai's armor was very heavy mostly is it rained. Finally, in Documents E and F swore a certain oath or vow to show their loyalty. Although the Samurai swore oaths, “he stands in physical readiness for any call to service
Military is a big part of how countries protect themselves in the world. Many countries have militaries. Some military strategies, weapons, and tactics came from ancient history. The military in Ancient Rome and in Ancient Greece played an important factor in keeping both civilizations safe.
According to Morey (1901), Carthage was a wealthier nation with brilliant leaders, rich in commercial resources. It had a more powerful navy and they showed their greatness in their successes. On the other hand, Rome was better organized and had a more efficient army. It depended on the well-organized political system and the character of its people.
The Spartans had elite military force and Ancient Rome generals trained their armies to be like Spartans. The selection for the strongest amongst the population was a common trait in Sparta that was passed down to Ancient Rome. Ancient Greek’s military trainings influenced Ancient Rome in their powerful army. However, a strong army would be ineffective without a strong leader. Alexander the Great significantly influenced the leadership style of Julius Caesar.
Ancient Civilizations of the ancient world have explained a lot of things in our present days, but what makes it so great is that it’s architecture. The ancient Greek and Ancient Roman are very rich and variable history and culture, but also they had similarities and differences The Ancient Greek and Ancient Roman civilizations had some differences although they are very close to each other. First, they had different social systems; the ancient Greek divided their social systems into five categories: slaves, freedmen, metics, citizens and women , and in the ancient Greek women were not given a position they were like to be less than slaves, but in the ancient Roman civilization they dived into four categories: freedmen, slaves, plebians and patricians, and women were considered citizen if they were not born into slavery, however they were not able to hold any position or vote. Second, The ancient Greek created and developed the three famous classical orders which is Doric, Ionic and Corinthian, On the other hand Ancient Roman took the classical order with making minor differences and created the arch and used it in their buildings.
Ancient Greek and ancient Rome are often confused with one another even though there are great differences between the two. Both countries are Mediterranean but have social class differences, different mythology, different life values and different architectural concepts. It is said that much of what Rome used in everyday life was taken from the ancient Greek civilization as the ancient Greek civilization started 5th century BC. And it was not till hundreds of years later that the roman civilization started. Cities in Ancient Greece were differentiated by hills.