Differences And Similarities Between Frederick Douglass And Socrates

593 Words3 Pages

Both Frederick Douglass and Socrates prioritize the True over their reputations. Willing to admit his weaknesses, Douglass’s main goal is to seek the True even if it means leaving his reputation undefended. He begins his speech by having a “distrust of [his] ability” and claims that when it comes to public speaking, he has “little experience” (Douglass). Douglass admits that topics concerning American history should be discussed with people who were educated through the school system instead of with a slave who has no educational background. He ultimately establishes trust with his audience by pursuing the True over maintaining his reputation. Sharing similar priorities with Douglass, Socrates humbly accepts Callicles’ refutations and allows his reputation to be vulnerable. Douglass’ speech exemplifies the Beautiful when discussing the impact slavery has on the church. In response to slavery, the ministers, “strip the love of God of its beauty and leave the throng of religion a huge, horrible, repulsive form.” (Douglass). Appalled at the church for supporting the ugliness and injustice of slavery, Douglass claims that slavery is in no way “divine” and that …show more content…

He believes that there are “forces in operation” that will end slavery, especially because of America’s naivety and youth (Douglass). Douglass’ conclusion exemplifies the pursuit of the Good because he never loses faith or hope in the “higher power”. Similarly, Socrates never gives up on the pursuit of the Good, even when others are willing to. Towards the end of the Gorgias, Socrates questions Callicles on his ability to keep up with their conversation and ends up finishing the debate by himself. He is always willing to continue the debate until him and his prolocutor reach the True and Good. Socrates’ unending pursuit of the Good parallels Douglass’ never-ending faith and hope in America’s

Open Document