Topic
Critically review an article on leadership.
Rao, M. S. (2013). Soft leadership: a new direction to leadership. Industrial and Commercial Training, 45(3), 143 – 149. doi:10.1108/00197851311320559
There are many great leaders all over the world such as Prophet Muhammad, p.b.u.h, Mahatma Gandhi, Alexander the Great, and Tun Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad. All these leaders have their own style in leading their countries or communities. Prophet Muhammad, one of the most influential people not only from the religion that he leads which is Islam but also from his leadership style, at least to the Muslim all over the world (Encyclopedia Britannica, c2014). He is one of the most soft and gentle leader that have been known. Apart from Prophet Muhammad,
…show more content…
The 11 C’s are character, charisma, conscience, conviction, courage, communication, compassion, commitment, consistency, consideration and contribution. The leadership codes are strategists, executors, talent managers and human capital developers. In his paper, he also includes some questions asked by the leaders from several organizations that are interested in his concept. The questions are asked and answered during the ILA webinar. From the paper, he mentions that to become a soft leader, ones does not require to possess all C’s, enough to have majority of the C’s as others can be developed over time. He also adds that Mahatma Gandhi is one of the leaders that possess all 11 …show more content…
Reading through the paper, readers are delivered with the author’s promises to elaborate on the soft leadership concept as well as provision of the questions and answers from the ILA webinar that had greatly helped for those that had missed the webinar to clearly understand the soft leadership concept. Few examples of leaders that possess several C’s of leadership will help readers to understand more on the concept of the 11 C’s of leadership. In addition, the mention of the name Mahatma Gandhi is helping readers to envision the soft-leader.
Another criticism that can be made is this paper can be considered as relevant to the current situation. The modern world is not suitable era for leadership with force and strength. Although power in terms of force and strength are also important, they do not play an important role as in the World War I and World War II era. Nowadays, people tend to prefer leaders with great empathy and really concerns about the followers or partners in context of soft leadership. In addition, although Mahatma Gandhi, whom is considered as a soft-leader by the author, the term soft-leadership itself is relatively
Peter Drucker once said “Effective leadership is not about making speeches or being liked; leadership is defined by results not attributes”(BrainyQuote). Indeed, many leaders enjoy being popular. But popularity is not the most important trait in a leader; people should look at a leader’s results rather than his/her ability to speak. In the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding, many characters have the potential to be leaders. Yet, judging from his characteristics, Piggy would be the best candidate for leadership.
Wherever human beings are accumulated together in large numbers, they need leadership. Even a school needs a principle to mentor and escalate the school’s rank. Armies need generals to lead them to a courageous victory. Civilians need governments, captains of industry and intellectual leaders of thought as well. However, There are characteristics common to most great leaders that can be picked out.
A leader has the expertise to make people aware of the advantages of doing a certain thing, thereby creating a desire in people to follow him/her”. Good management is managers who are also leaders, they should also take responsibility for all that is done under their ‘command’. Application to movie In The Big Short it is emphasised how corrupt,
True leadership requires one to be able to understand, inspire, motivate, and communicate with others. Good
An American president must maintain an image that is usually described as strong, powerful, leader of a free world and commander in chief, among others. Many base a president’s success on whether they were true to these titles during their time in office. One of the most important roles of a president, which seems to encompass all the others, is that of a leader. However, a leader can be viewed as different things and when determining if a president was a successful leader, all aspects of their presidencies are taken into consideration. In American politics, real leadership can be defined as one that “creates the conditions and coalitions for others to step up as well” as described by President Barack Obama (“The president’s definition of leadership”).
Is Military Leadership any different from that in other field of human endeavour? Does it require a similar leadership philosophy, choice of leadership style and leadership values as a leadership in civilian life? Leadership cuts across different facets of life. People often debate whether leadership comes from birth or acquired over time and for some, it may be a bit of both. People are born with a degree of leadership embedded in their inherent character and personality, but it is the life experience that would hone this further to a varying degree depending on one’s upbringing and development.
“Are Theories universal?” is an edited book which contain of many different articles and it has been compiled together. This book has been edited by Anders Ortenblad, Ibrahim Ahmad Bajunid, Muhammad Babur and Roshni Kumari. The auditors have decided the format for this book to standardised it and make it looks universal so that it can be understood by all level of readers from all over the world. The book explained different type of tradition theories which may or may not be universal to be used by all different people, cultural and regions. Hence, some of the theories may be accepted and rejected based on its universalism.
In spite of the fact that’ leadership analysis’ is the art of breaking down a leader into basic psychological components for study and use by academics and practitioners, a sound leadership analyses
Today, leadership is considered to be more art than science. Equally observable is that those who engage in leadership invoke a variety of leadership styles and traits that can vary greatly, and yet can be equally successful in a variety of situations. No one could deny the tremendous leadership skills of Martin Luther King, but at the same time, for example, do not highlight the skills and success of General Schwarzkopf in crushing the army of enemies. As is generally known, the personal motives affect the leadership preferences. For example, some people choose adventurous and strict leadership style, while the others prefer peaceful and continuous.
Leadership has been defined in a variety of ways, there are multiple authors and theorists who have tried to define and understand leadership, all leading to varying theories and conclusions, but one thing that is universally understood is the importance of effective leadership and how someone with good leadership skills can impact so many people around them. (Kakabadse and Kakabadse, 1999; Yukl, 2002; Northouse,2013) The main components that have been identified to play a role in leadership are relations between leader and subordinates, interaction form between leader and followers, the influence that the leader has, the way in which the leader behaves and finally a leader’s traits. (Yukl, 2002) These elements that make up a leader, are then used as building blocks to identify the way in which each specific leader deals with its followers.
Introduction To be a good leader in a way, you need to know how to influence, motivate and let others to contribute towards the road of success which they are the members in the organisations. There are a lot of elements of leadership which lead the leader to be a good leader. The most common element is motivating others and keep on stimulating the desire and energy into people to continually interest and committed to attain a goal. Different element created different types of leadership which is useful on different environment. One of the leadership style that is very common in Asian country, the “power distance”.
In fact, leadership is an art rather than a science. The process of learning leadership is a hand-on experience, which focuses on practice instead of concepts itself. This course provides me a chance to gain more insight about leadership and it helps me develop my new image of leadership. Meanwhile, I also use the theories in our textbook as a framework for self-assessment of my leadership skills and try to develop my own leadership style during the
This paper is going to encompass different leadership theories and their relevance to my own personal personality and method of leadership. There will be information on the advantages and disadvantages of the leadership theories and information on each including examples. The purpose of this paper is to view various kinds of leadership theories and apply them to a real-life scenario. Leadership Theories There are quite a few different leadership theories available for people to take information from and use in business settings and even personal settings.
Introduction At the present competitive world leadership is a dynamic process where influencing others is the most important issues. That’s why exercising power is one of the most important issue to be a charismatic leader and this power doesn’t come automatically it comes after advocating other fellow members. Here, one thing is most important to remind that the power should be imposed and exercise within the worth and boundaries of the leaders. However organization’s culture, its mission, vision, short-term strategies all these reform the leadership process.
‘Organizations provide its managers with legitimate authority to lead, but there is no assurance that they will be able to lead effectively’ (Lunenburg, 2011). Organizational success usually requires a combination of both management and leadership. In today’s dynamic work environment, leaders are expected to challenge the present state of affairs, and to motivate and convince organization members. Managers are needed to assist in creating and maintaining a positive and well-functioning workplace. ‘Leadership and management are often considered practically overlapping concepts’ (Bohoris and Vorria, 2007, p. 1).