The Soham murders refer to the death of of Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells, two ten year old schoolgirls who disappeared on the 4th of August 2002 around 6:30 pm in Soham, Cambridgeshire. Ian Huntley, the local school caretaker was found guilty of these murders. Throughout this case review, the case will first be shortly reviewed, then the main issues will be pointed out, an awareness of the procedures and forensic guidance will then be demonstrated, then we will comment and rationale and to finish we will conclude.
On Saturday, August the 17th, the bodies of the Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman were found brutally murdered in a ditch. On the same day, Ian Huntley was charged for the murders of Holly West and Jessica Chapman, and Maxine Carr,
…show more content…
Though this case showed many issues on the investigation side mainly due to Patricia Wiltshire. Firstly Patricia Wiltshire found two paths that could have been used by Ian Huntley to enter the ditch where he dropped Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman. Patricia Wiltshire says she did not take note of route B because she was concentrating on route A as soon as she found it, she claims route B was not “important” because it seemed “obvious that route A had been used”. The second path was not measured and was just followed by eye and no evidence for a continuation of B was searched for. Patricia Wiltshire said not remembering the name police officer she told about the second path to the ditch, she told Mr Peter Murphy but did not take note of the others. Patricia Wiltshire knew how important it is to take notes of everything on a crime scene, but she did not. Patricia Wilshire also made a mistake by not looking for footmarks in between the bodies and the line of B, she declared that she would have not been able to find any because the soil was thick twig litter. Even if she said that route A was the one used to enter the ditch, she did not make a verification of this fact and
Topic: Azaria Chamberlain By Laura Winkler Deep Question: Question: How did the forensic scientists get it so wrong (evidence) and why did they convict her on the 2nd inquest if there wasn’t enough evidence that sufficiently supported the murder of Azaria Chamberlain. Shouldn’t everyone have the right to be innocent until proven guilty? Evidence carries weight and the weight of the flawed forensic evidence in Lindy Chamberlain’s trial sent her to prison. The story of Lindy Chamberlain has changed quiet a lot throughout the last 30 years with the advancement of technology and science.
In a small Southern California town, a woman calls police to report her husband never returned from his afternoon run. The police determine that Robert Dorotik was a marathon runner and suspected he had experienced a medical episode until they discover his body the next morning. Initial examination indicated death by blunt force trauma to the head. Additionally there was a rope around Bob’s neck and signs of strangulation. The tire tracks around the body implied the body had been dumped at the location.
The victim was able to describe her attacker, and they were able to make a sketch of who they think the attacker for the Lover’s Lane murder is, and this separate case. Even though; with a sketch made, no one has ever said anything about any sightings, leading to a dead end in the
Detectives have also found fresh muddy footprints leading to the road and disappearing,
There have been many people who have looked into the case of Karen Silkwood. One investigator had seen skid marks along with the incredulous dent in her back bumper. That indicated that another car had forced Silkwood into a culvert (“November 13, 1974). Considering the fact that they was evidence that there was another car many people said that is was indeed murder. Even Bill Silkwood,Karen Silkwood’s father, deducted that she was murdered exclaiming that he needed to learn who killed his daughter (Bashke 194).
The investigators were convinced it was Adnan Syed- the ex boyfriend, they saw through his charm and manipulation accusing him of killing Hae because they broke up which was in December a month before she went missing. The amount of evidence in the case was not strong. First, when they tested
She was attacked on August 15th, 1975 with his common weapons, a hammer and a knife (Crime + Investigation), in Halifax (The Sun, 2022). To attack her, Sutcliffe followed her home (Crime + Investigation), but she managed to survive with trauma from the attack (The Sun, 2022), although police could not link her attack and Anna’s (Farlex). So after two victims, police could not find out who was doing these attacks. Tracy Browne was lucky to have survived being Sutcliffe’s third victim. Was attacked on August 27th, 1975 with his hammer (Crime + Investigation), and she was 14 years old when attacked (The Sun, 2022).
As with any criminal case, there are always a number of issues pertaining the stages of the crime and also the media and the general public’s opinion of the case. Many of the issues and explicit actions of certain individuals that had happened during the Corryn Rayney case had affected the interpretation of the case in someway for both government workers and the general public. By analysing the issues of the case, it allows a much more detailed view on the case and how most of the issues are linked in one way or another. One of the issues regarding this case was where a police officer had been found attempting to pressure forensic pathologists to alter their case reports to align with their best interests.
She was later convicted and hanged for murdering her mother’s lover’s wife and child in a similar way to the Ripper
Murder on a Sunday Morning, is an Oscar award-winning documentary that tells of the conviction and trial of 15-year-old Brenton Butler for the death of Mary Ann Stephens in Jacksonville, Florida of May 2000. The film is a 111-minute movie directed by Jean-Xavier de Lastrade. The plot originates from the incident of Mary Ann Stephens being shot in the head by a black assailant; and then begins to unravel as Brenton Butler is arrested 90 minutes after the murder has occurred. Pat McGuinness, one of the main interviewees in the movie, takes up the case and defends Brenton Butler. The documentary presents the film from the trial, as well as interviews and investigations that Pat McGuinness and his partner Ann Finnel performed to gather facts for
The nonfiction book, Jumped, Fell, or Pushed: How Forensics Solved 50 “Perfect” Murders, is an informative and well written book by the author, Stephen A. Koehler. Okay, you get two options, take Mr. Laney’s forensic science class at Lincoln High School or read this book. If you don’t know anything about Forensics, this book gives a sufficient overview of the subject and its counterparts. There is no main plot or developing characters within the book. The type of evidence varies from chapter-to-chapter, as well as the forensic technique implemented to analyze that evidence.
On February 11, 1987, Peggy Hettrick’s body was found in a field in Fort Collins, Colorado. Hettrick’s body was located near the Prime Minister Pub and Grill which was the last place Hettrick was spotted alive at approximately 1:30 in the morning (Possley, 2016). When police found Peggy Hettrick’s body she had been stabbed in the back and sexually mutilated. Eye witnesses reported that Hetterick left the pub after allegedly witnessing her boyfriend with another female.
Excellency, surely her claims and this trial deserve to be re-examined. Human lives are on the line! Have you thought of the unfairness of this court? If the devil lives on such confidence (Act 3, p78), the court is surely the devil or it worships his majesty for believing the girls’ false claims without even requiring a single piece of evidence from them. Giles Corey and John Proctor presented the court with credible and tangible evidence.
They searched and could not find the body instead they found the shirt the baby was wearing which had no signs of a dingo attack which made the public and media suspicious about the claim it was a dingo that took the baby She reported it to the police and a search was taken across the campsite and beyond, they only found a jacket that was smeared with blood An inquiry was taken to find out the real reason for the death of the toddler, the inquiry taken by the coroner supported the couple saying that a Dingo did take the kid and that the police “‘evidence’ against the Chamberlains did not stand up.” (The Story Lindy Chamberlain) The Chamberlains Home was raided a couple of months later and eyewitnesses continued to be interviewed by detectives and police, More inquests were requested the first was overturned the second resulted in nothing but was turned over to trial
Agatha Christie’s murder mystery novel A Murder is Announced, is full of complex, deceitful characters and an intense storyline that keeps the reader questioning every character’s motive. Each character in her novel has their own background story that gives insight to the main issue; the murder at Little Paddocks. Very often, however, these stories are full of unexpected twists and lies that challenge the reader’s ideas about who could be trying to kill Miss Blacklock, and why? Chapter twenty-one and chapter twenty-two both work to create the connection between character and plot because they show instances of a character revealing an idea that can change the whole outlook on the case completely.