Since the World Wide Web was introduced to the world in 1990 by computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee, the Internet has changed in many ways, but also remained the same in certain aspects. It is remains as a platform where members of the global community can interact with anyone, anywhere; given they have an online connection as stated in the article “The Internet and Global Rights” by Lloyd Axworthy. However, while there may be numerous benefits of the Internet, the World Wide Web has greater potential for evil because it can be used as a weapon to expose people’s personal information, exploit and prey on children, and create discrimination.
From the moment you have access to the Internet, you are warned of the risks of being part of the online
…show more content…
In a similar fashion, the Internet can be utilized as a tool to spread hate and discrimination on a variety of topics. Members of such pages, blogs, and sites dedicate time and effort to spread hate and voice their negative opinions. Moreover, the members of hate groups can now completely avoid the risk of meeting in public. In the past, whenever hate groups wanted to gather, they had to choose a location and be discrete about it. However, a discrimination group could be conversing about negative topics at the moment and no one would realize. The Internet has provided a cover and mask for cyberbullies and members of society who would otherwise be too scared to speak their negative thoughts in real life. To illustrate, an individual may have spent a countless amount of time working on something they are proud of, only to be belittled by a disheartening comment left by someone they have never met before. Axworthy, author of the article “The Internet and Global Human Rights” believes and states that there should be rules governing the Internet: “The Internet should not be a law-free-zone” (Axworthy 180). While this statement is true, it is only carried out to a certain extent. Anything that is a crime in the real world should be a crime online. The fact is that there is too many tasks for the cyber crime divisions of the government to handle. For every blog dedicated to hate speech that is taken down, another can be put up. The Internet is a tool. What the tool executes, whether for good or for evil, is up to people who hold the tool in their
Tyranny of the Mob Rhetorical Analysis In his article “Tyranny of the Mob,” Joel Stein emphasizes how the dynamic of the Internet has drastically changed over the course of a few years. He wants you to look at your normal interactions online and ask questions about what made it get to where it is today. Are you one of the people who has to censor yourself to prevent online trolling and did you even notice you were doing it? Stein wants to shine a light on the people who are making the internet a negative wasteland for hatred to manifest.
The more we use the internet as an online we are plunging ourselves into a dark era of arrogance and normality. We are all drawn to the new exciting world online where anything is
Amid the ever changing world we live in where the internet expands globally, the question arises how to regulate and prosecute wrongdoings. As technology advances daily, laws have to adapt quickly to ensure that the people are protected in the physical sense and in the virtual sense. For the most part the lack of physical presence is difficult to identify the
The world describes itself in anonymity. The online world blurs credibility with smooth-talking from behind the mask of a screen. “It has become appallingly obvious,” a certain quote reads, “that our technology has exceeded our humanity.” Various sources credit this quote to Albert Einstein, yet if one delves deeper into the Internet in an attempt to find a solid source, they will discover that not one website can infallibly say that Einstein said that (cite QI). Fahrenheit 451 warns of technology’s evolution into a smudging, anonymous being.
A major problem that has dominated the world in today’s society is the development of mass media. The mass media is said, “to be divided into two types: print and broadcast,” but the advancement of the internet became problematic. The internet allows the public to view the news by providing information between the citizens, and government faster than any other source. Consequently, this resulted in the decline of newspapers while more people began reading online. The negative effect of the internet is described as, “a wild west atmosphere” in which individuals may post whatever they wish online, “without professional, organizational, or legal concerns about its source” (Janda, Berry, Goldman, Schildkraut, and Manna, 2017, 148).
“Black Code: Surveillance, Privacy, and the Dark Side of the Internet,” written by Ronald J. Deibert, outlines different issues and benefits that have arised due to the growing use of the internet. Deibert begins his essay providing information about the internet such as the rapid growth of smartphones, how the internet has taken over most of societies lives, and key differences between previous technological innovations compared to the internet. He continues his essay by discussing the U.S.A. Patriot Act and how this law should be retracted based on the fact that various companies, like Google, can give the government our personal searches if they ask. Then, he talks about various types of cyber crimes and how we need stronger regulations to control the internet so these crimes would not be possible. Deibert concludes his essay explaining how the internet has provided many benefits in today’s nation, but the internet needs stricter regulations for our own protection.
The modernization of the web can have positive and negative consequences on the world. It is sure in light of the fact that it gives everyone the power to access any information, that they need in second. In any case, it is contrary since individuals start to get limited focus and just focus on the things they need to see as opposed to seeing the full picture. To begin with, The Loneliness of the Interconnected is an essay on how the internet
Jeremy Waldron challenges the absolutist position in his book, The Harm in Hate Speech, where he addresses the damage caused by hate speech and notes its relevance to an extensive freedom of speech (Potter
Hateful speech has adapted and modified it own version of ‘peaceful protest’ , maintaining the fundamental prospect of freedom, while crudely striping away peacefull and replacing it with hate: ‘hateful protest’. These ideologies of justice prompt violent outstrikes from religious and anti-religious groups that seek to protect their own personal agendas against each
In 1988, the Internet was opened to the public. At that time, not many people were aware of what a huge impact the Internet would have on the lives of future generations and cultures. While it was at first widely accepted by many users because of its astonishingly convenient and unlimited access to information, the enthusiasm for the Internet has more recently diminished and even disappeared in some cases. Many people no longer view the Internet as a helpful tool, but more as a harmful weapon, attacking every area of our lives, including education, communication, literacy, attention span, memory, intelligence, relationships, politics, economics, even sleep, diet, and physical activity. The Internet is ultimately affecting and determining the
Imagine living in a world without any internet. Imagine the amount of trouble a person would require to go through in order to find out the simplest things. The internet nowadays has become an essential part of almost every human being’s life. Cutting the internet off for just one day my actually leave the world in a state of commotion. Every type of technology may be used in either a way that benefit’s a person, or a way that may harm a person.
Committee: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Topic: Protecting Internet Privacy Country: Federative Republic of Brazil The universal declaration of human rights: what we, the United Nations, use as a basis of rights each individual obtains at birth, and what we stand to protect for each individual on Earth. Over time, our ideas of these rights have been cemented into society’s law, making sure individuals obtain the rights they deserve. But as humanity progresses into the future and technology develops, inventions such as the internet start to blur the lines of right and wrong. A new form of cybercrime (internet crime) is formed relating with even large countries like the U.S.A, China, and even Brazil itself
looks at how it ultimately affects society and targeted groups. There are a myriad of arguments for and against the allowance of hate speech. Some citing Democracy and the first amendment others stem from the fear of eroded freedoms of expression and have valid points, but ultimately, it corrodes society’s human rights and freedoms. The two fold issue being intolerance of the freedom of self-determination and the fact that some are born a color or culture and have no choice. Therefore, hate speech is anti-social and damaging to society as a whole.
The internet has been a wonderful home and place to me over the six or seven years I’ve dedicated to using it in my free time. And I have seen many fads and problems come and go, but there has always been one problem that has stayed and has been around since the beginning. In recent years, the users of the internet have seen the rise of the internet troll take place. Most have been a nuisance online, with the constant attacks on people and online groups. And now, not only do they affect the internet, they have started to affect and cause trouble in the real world.
Many people over the world rely on ‘real life’ and ‘offline’ action and behaviours to express their opinion on politics. For those without the internet, their voices may go unheard and ignored. Furthermore, Papacharissi expresses that popular forums online may not create a utopian democratic society as many extremist groups are able to discuss their views online. Knights of the Ku Klux Klan is a great illustration of how the internet can publicize extremist views and undemocratic values, as they promote racism towards African-American citizens. These negative effects are a creating a significant obstruction towards the creation of a global democratic society.