Born into the patriarchal restraints of the 1876 US nation, Susan Glaspell is revered as a trailblazer in early feminism through her dynamic background as a writer that intellectually represented a nation of women whose needs and abilities are swallowed by misogynistic tradition and underrepresentation in law. According to Laughlin McDonald’s article “A Jury Of Her Peers”, “ Aside from the “defect of sex,” women were excluded from juries for a variety of reasons: their primary obligation was to their families and children; they should be shielded from hearing the details of criminal cases, particularly those involving sex offenses; they would be too sympathetic to persons accused of crimes; and keeping male and female jurors together during …show more content…
The first is an unfinished quilt that catches the eye of Mrs.Hale, who is shocked by the poor stitching towards the end “ All the rest of it has been so nice and even. And look at this! It's all over the place! Why, it looks as if she didn't know what she was about!”(Glaspell). While fixing the quilt Mrs.Hale is interrupted by Mr.Peters who Mockingly exclaims “They wonder if she was going to quilt it or just knot it!”(Glaspell). The comment from Sheriff Peters is meant to remind the woman that they are once again focusing on Trifles, however, the Quilt’s shift in stitching represents a shift in Minnie's mental state, The woman also confirmed that a knotting style was used to tie the quilt similar to the knot used to kill John in his sleep. Analyzing the details of the quilt provides evidence that may incriminate Minnie however the arrogance of male investigators made the woman's revelation nothing more than a …show more content…
Removing this evidence is a clear obstruction of justice, a criminal act, however, the lack of woman jurors, the injustice Minnie Wright faced, as well as a build-up of frustration from the constant belittling by male investigators gave Mrs.Peters and Mrs.Hale a sense of agency as the pair let the attorney believe his own arrogance and led them to take the law into their own hands in order to get back at the patriarchal injustices embedded into societal
I agree with Tamara Steckler and accept her overall idea that society is responsible for the problem of juvenile crimes, and we cannot discuss or implement reform until society addresses the root problem of this issue. I support Steckler's argument because reform should be taken place to figure out the root cause of the high percentage rate of incarceration amongst adolescents. In her op-ed " Passing Judgement : Juveniles Crime indicts adults, " published in the online publication www.citylimits.org on July 8,2010, Tamara Steckler claims that the most effective way to reform the juvenile justice system is to keep offenders in their homes and communities whenever possible. Steckler notes that teenage behavior can be seen as normal depending
Thousands of women have screamed at the top of their lungs, clawed at the patriarchy, and tirelessly fought for their rights as citizens of the United States of America. From the beginning of mankind, women have been labeled as inferior to men not only physically, but mentally and intellectually as well. Only in 1920 did women gain the right to voice their opinions in government elections while wealthy white men received the expected right since the creation of the United States. A pioneer in women’s suffrage, Susan B. Anthony publicly spoke out against this hypocrisy in a time when women were only seen as child bearers and household keepers. Using the United State’s very own Constitution and Declaration as ammunition, Anthony wrote countless
First, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters notice an errant quilt patch in an otherwise beautiful quilt. The women notice how lovely the other quilts are and how the other rough-looking patch stands out: “all the rest of them had been so
In “The Jury of Her Peers”, the author Susan Glaspell aims to defy traditional gender dynamics to expose the societal norms that were prevalent in the early 20th century. In the story, she skillfully employs literary elements such as setting, narrative perspective, characterization, and theme to subvert inequitable notions and shed light on the profound injustices women faced at that time, allowing readers to fully comprehend the impact of such constraints on the women’s lives. The setting of “The Jury of Her Peers” plays a crucial role in enhancing the story’s themes and serves as a reflection of broader societal constraints and established traditions that were prevalent during the early 20th century. Glaspell sets the stage right from the
Introduction. A Jury by Her Peers authored by Susan Glaspell narrates the investigative events that occur after the death of John Wright in his house. As neighbors and the Dickson County administration, themes of sisterhood and gender roles appear through the actions and hidden motives of the characters. The book, A Jury by Her Peers, expounds on the silent suffering of women and being perceived as unintelligent while providing justifications for covering up of John Wrights death.
“A Jury of Her Peers”, written by Susan Glaspell, tells the story of the murder of Mr. Wright and its criminal investigation by Mr. Peters, the town sheriff, and the county attorney. In this short story, Glaspell illustrates how the female perspective is shackled by traditional gender roles, leaving their voices unheard and household abuse. This is depicted by Mrs. Wright, who murders her husband due to the abuse she experienced, and Mrs. Peters, who notices details that the men overlook, in turn cracking the case. In this story, Mrs. Wright has a pet canary that her husband kills. Glaspell's description of the canary symbolizes Minnie Wright’s character and role as a household woman in a male-dominated society.
A Jury of Her Peers by Susan Glaspell involves an investigation of the murder of Mr. Wright after he was strangled to death in his bed by a rope. His wife, Minnie Wright, is the leading suspect since she was in the bed with him when the murder occurred. Mr. Peters, the sheriff, Mr. Hale, the farmer who found Mr. Wright dead, and Mr. Henderson, the county attorney, all return to Minnie’s house to try to find the reason why she killed her husband. Mrs. Peters, the sheriff's wife, and Martha Hale, the farmer’s wife join the men, but to bring Minnie a few things from her house up to the prison where she is staying. From the very beginning of the story, the men are all very sure of themselves and belittle the two women who had tagged along.
Abuse is a way of controlling someone. Minnie Wright was not always a quiet women. She used to be beautiful; she used to sing. She used to be happy. Minnie Wright, in Susan Glaspell’s
Mrs. Hale states, “She was rockin’ back and forth. She had her apron in her hand and was kind of-pleating it” (Glaspell 1081). This allows us to know that Mrs. Wright was still shocked from what happened. It is also seen in her unfinished quilt and her messy kitchen. Her unfinished quilt has many knots in it.
As a senior, I chose to take composition two at Countryside High School in my last semester. I previously finished composition one and looked forward to enhance my comprehension of shorty stories and poems in composition two. I also wanted to receive dual enrollment credit for ENC1102 for my future education. Mr. Leo, my professor, taught the class in depth information on short stories by discussing the theme and symbols of the writings however, one short story in particular stood out to me that I will profoundly remember for years to come. Five years from now, I know I will remember the short story “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell due to its meaningful symbolization and the overall irony.
From this aggressive behavior, she could have pulled the string too tight and caused the rest of the pattern to crinkle, like pulling a thread out of a shirt. These small details suggest that Mrs. Wright was angry or uptight at the moment
In the time that “A Jury of Her Peers”, was written women did not have many rights. They also did not have many opportunities to do other things outside their home. They're expected stay home cook clean and take care of the children to their husband came home. Mr. and Mrs. Wright did not have any children nor did she take care of house very well. Her neighbor even told the sheriff this.
The men also take light of the small details that the women take note of, in particular as to how Mrs. Wright was contemplating the construction of the quilt. As the women converse and share experiences of their own and those of Mrs. Wright, they begin to form
Her reasoning, that “bad sewing always made me fidgety” (1085). The women begin to suspect that Mrs. Wright killed her husband, and keep finding clues that support their
Wright’s belongings are incomplete and out of place, particularly in the kitchen. The women find this to be abnormal and begin speculating the significance of these items. During one point in the play, Mrs. Hale notices an uneven stitch in Mrs. Wright’s unfinished quilt. She asks Mrs. Peters, “’what do you suppose she was so nervous about?’” Because of the death of Mr. Wright, Mrs. Hale views the stitching in a suspicious manner.