State v. Dedge Article Critique
Introduction
On December 8, 1981 Wilton Dedge was working in his shop in Florida where he repairs transmissions. A 17 year old girl Jane Smith that stays in Florida about 50 miles from where Dedge works, was rapped two times and was cut by a razor 65 times. The description that the girl gave law enforcement was a tall white male standing about six and a half foot tall and weighing around 200 pounds. Dedge was seen at the gas station twice buy the girls sister where she called police. Dedge went to the police because he had always trusted law enforcement. He knew he was innocent and figured he would have the situation worked out and he would be free to go. He was surprised to find out that he was sentenced to
…show more content…
Merjian and he sees to be biases in this article towards wrongful convictions. He spends the first couple pages in his article explaining how wrongful convictions are happening and how it’s usually on higher offense cases. He goes on two show stats on how so many cases have had to be changed in the past due to wrongful convictions. I feel as if my reaction to this article is the same as his when he was writing it. I think it is very odd that the courts would constantly get cases wrong. I feel like after the courts made these errors over a certain amount of time that they would come up with some type of procedures to try and minimize wrongful convictions. Also I feel like it is crazy for there to be and obvious wrongful conviction. By obvious wrongful conviction I mean like in the case of State v. Dedge where half of the evidence that was pending against him wasn’t strong enough to convict some one or the witnesses used had past history of being wrong in court. I don’t understand how the court system wouldn’t take the time to help someone that was sentenced to life in prison when all evidence proves his or her …show more content…
This article has the potential to show the reader how often wrongful convictions actually do happen and the means that someone wrongfully convicted has to go through to try and turn there case back around. I do believe that this article is a little bias and that the reader doesn’t really get to see the amount of times that the courts actually get the cases right. It’s just a good article in the fact it shows the amount of times wrongful convictions happen and the time it takes and effort from and individual to get a case
This article is about a 16 year old boy Ethan Couch, who murdered 4 people and assaulted 2 people while intoxicated. Ethan Couch was sent to court, he was sentenced to 10 years probation and time in rehab. I strongly believe that the justice system didn’t handle the case correctly. I believe that Ethan Couch shouldn’t have only gotten probation and rehab. I believe Ethan Couch should be sent to jail for what he did.
For the most part I agree with the writer idea. I like what the writer said how the justice was served by the court. Kinkl murdered 4 people and attempted 26 murder case, so he deserve 112 years to be in prison. Even though Kinkl has a mental disorder problem, he was a danger to the community and needed to be watched by the government for the public safety. The audience can clearly see what happened on the Kiniakl cause from the court report that is presented.
Michael McAlister was convicted of abduction of a female victim at knifepoint from an apartment complex laundry room at night time in Richmond, VA and rape. The female victim was unable to definitively describe the suspect who attacked and raped her as she could only describe her attacker as someone wielding a knife, a plaid shirt, and she explained that she was only able to get a partial glimpse of her attacker because he was wearing a stocking cap over his face. Her attacker would be later described as a 6 foot tall white male with shoulder length blond hair and a beard; a description that would match Michael McAlister’s appearance. Police then proceeded to ask McAlister to take a picture wearing a plaid shirt for the photo line-up.
As Ollin Crawford’s district attorney, she has served more than enough time for four crimes using a fake weapon and committed the crimes within two months apart back in 1984. Unlike, Sue Kennon who received a much lower sentence. Ms. Kennon also used a fake weapon and committed four crimes within eight days apart. Both woman were tried under the Virginia’s Three-Strike law. The intent of the, “Three-Strike law was described by its proponents as targeting the most violent career criminals and gained public favor in the wake of such heinous crimes as the Polly Klass murder,” (criminal justice pg, 111).
The American legal system is supposed to be fair. In recent times, majority of minorities will argue against the fairness and that there are inherent biases embedded throughout the system. The issue of those biases is a separate case, however, the legal system can be wrong, even in instants of murder and rape. The story of Randolph Arledge illustrates how the legal system is not perfect. The law failed him for 29 years, but after DNA testing, he had his justice.
Manufacturing Guilt Wrongful Convictions in Canada, follows the theme of the first edition where the authors demonstrate what leads to wrongful conviction. We all know that innocent mistakes happen however, wrongful convictions are usually the result of deliberate actions of those working in the criminal justice system and not unintended errors. By using Canadian cases as miscarriages of justice, the authors argues that understanding wrongful convictions and how to prevent them is incomplete outside the broader societal context in which they occur, particularly regarding racial and social inequality. This book also analyzes how forensic science is used as a resource for prosecutors rather than seeking the truth. What is miscarriage of justice?
Ewell v. Robinson, The Rape Case that Rocked the Nation By: Hailey Ellwanger After hours of jury deliberation, the case of Ewell v. Robinson has reached its conclusion. The jury finding the defendant Tom Robinson guilty of raping Mayella Ewell. This case is a prime example of the injustice that can occur when juries listen to their prejudices instead of the evidence. The two different sides of the story vastly differ, the jury ruling in favor of the Ewell’s.
The verdict in this case generated an epidemic of outrage throughout the world. I agree with the not-guilty verdict on the murder one and two charges; however, the evidence is not as incontrovertible as some have suggested. I also agree that there was some mischaracterization around the 31 days; yet, to trivialize this behavior as simply immature is inaccurate. The way Casey handled the death was inexcusable.
Therefore, this is an outdated claim, due to our justice system changing and adapting to public beliefs. There may be a few wrongful convictions in the criminal justice system, however that does not make it cause more harm than good. In any system there are flaws, we cannot disregard all the good the justice system does. Although this system has flaws like all others, it is what safeguards our society's
The Clutter case is a prime example of this bias that passes through into court unfiltered. One of the jurors had actually stated, "... that ordinarily he was against it, but in this case no,” (326). Anyone can hear about a case and then become dead set on a decision before the actual trial even takes place. But the main issue here is that it’s not just a typical punishment, because this punishment ends in death. The death penalty is unfair as it is committing a murderer to the same treatment that they are being condemned for.
Nate Ms. Keeney Fourth period 3/2/2023 Bias in Courts Many people’s lives are and will be injured by bias in court rooms. Is similar to how bias is used in the Flawed. Cecelia Ahern’s use of bias in the Flawed damages people is similar to the bias in court rooms of modern day.
Out of the 337 cases where innocent men and women were wrongfully imprisoned nearly half of the true suspects were identified and convicted. The racial heritage of those who have been exonerated is fairly diverse, consisting of “206 African Americans, 104 Caucasians, 25 Latinos, and 2 Asian Americans” (The Innocence Project). (Transition) Although The Innocence Project has changed the lives of many who others would not afford them the opportunity to prove their innocence, they would not have been able to do so without the recent
There were claims on the Manton case study that Dixon had prior history of engaging in sexual activity at his high school, which led Dixon to be suspended twice for the prior sexual acts. At the time of this incident, Dixon was 18 years old, and the “victim” was 15 (Manton, 2005). Following this factual information, Dixon at that time claimed that the sexual act was consensual and accused the girl of fabricating the story because of fear of her parents finding out and punishing her for sleeping with a black man (Manton, 2005). Several charges were suggested for Dixon which included: statutory rape, aggravated child molestation, rape, sexual battery, false imprisonment, and aggravated assist (Manton, 2005). Dixon was then acquitted of a majority of the charges and found Dixon guilty of statutory rape and aggravated child molestation (Manton,
Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong In Brandon L. Garrett 's book, Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong, he makes it very clear how wrongful convictions occur and how these people have spent many years in prison for crimes they never committed. Garrett presents 250 cases of innocent people who were convicted wrongfully because the prosecutors opposed testing the DNA of those convicted. Garrett provided simple statistics such as graphs, percentages, and charts to help the reader understand just how great of an impact this was.
Luckily, it is known what causes wrongful convictions and how to fix them. Many wrongful convictions are due to mistaken eyewitnesses, jailhouse snitches, or false evidence. I think many of the wrongful convictions could be solved with harder evidence, more information. A case should not rely on a single eye witness but multiple.