In Nicholas Carr, Is google making us stupid, He emphasizes on many points,the main point being , how before the creation of the internet people had to spend hours and hours in the libraries looking for the right articles, but now with the creation of the internet things can get done faster and more efficiently. He also he argues that before the creation of the Internet people that loved to read and that had degrees related to reading found themselves less into reading when computers started to make an uprising. He also argues that the internet is being a primary source and now and it’s affecting our reading habits and demolishing our brains. In Clive Thompson, Smarter than you think, He’s trying to convince his readers that the internet …show more content…
He mostly relates his article to the game of chess and makes the point that no matter how good you are with your critical thinking once the internet is added into the “mix” the internet gives the players the upper hand because no one is able to think of as many possible moves as the internet. The internet will continue to shape our critical thinking as it brings more tools to our brains.
While, I mostly agree with Thompson there are some valid points that Carr makes as well. I agree mostly with Thompson because he is saying the internet is shaping our critical thinking and we, as human, don’t realize how we are being affected. One clear point I agree with from Carr is "I'm not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I'm reading….I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I'm
…show more content…
He states “Our tools are everywhere, linked with our minds,working in tandem.Search engines give us an ESP-like awareness those around us; ONline collaboration let far-flung collaborators tackle problems too tangle for any individuals. We’re becoming less like rodin’s thinkers and more like kasparov’s centaurs.(P.347)” This to me means that we are moving away from our critical thinking and are relying more on the internet. Another point that's made by Thompson is “Every new tool shapes the way we think, as well as what we think about. What this means is the things that are being continuously made are changing our critical thinking skills. Thompson central claim is that computers are not as smart as humans, but once you have been using them over a certain amount of time you seem to get better at working them and that’s what really makes you more efficient in using them. The point that I don’t agree with Carr on is “Their thoughts and actions fell scripped, as if they're following the steps of an algorithm (p.328.)” I don’t agree with Carr’s argument here because he’s emphasizing that human thoughts are being scripted and we don’t think about things critically, but not all of our thinking
The concentration that he once had while reading had nearly diminished. He was once able to read lengthy articles with no problem, but now the deep reading had become a serious struggle. Carr felt that he knew what was causing this problem. He states in the article that over the past several years, he has been doing much reading online. With reading
Summary One Nicholas Carr in his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” states that the internet is causing deficiencies in reading and has caused people to have brief attention spans while reading a book. Carr immediately goes into explanation on how he can no longer sit to read without becoming “fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do.” Carr then uses the rhetorical device of ethos by using creditable sources to back his claim. He uses a claim from scholars at University College London that stated, “It is clear that users are not reading online in traditional sense,” therefore stating people are skimming and scanning for information.
In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, the author suggests that modern technology is changing the way him and other people think. He argues that, in the past, it was much easier to engage in long readings. Now, he claims, reading is more challenging and people are more likely to skim a passage rather than fully absorb the information due to excessive use of the internet (313-314). Carr uses Friedrich Nietzsche’s relationship with his typewriter as an example to express that with every new technology, he warns, the human mind is vulnerable to a change in structure (319). Carr observes and suggests that the more people use and rely on computers, the more the human mind essentially becomes a form of artificial intelligence
Rhetorical Analysis In the article “Is Google Making us Stupid?”, author Nicholas Carr expresses his idea that the internet is taking over society and our thinking process. Google is affecting our abilities to read books, longer articles, and even older writings. Carr believes that we have become so accustomed to the ways of the internet, and we are relying on Google 's ability to sort through the details for us so we don 't have to, in order to get the information we find necessary more efficiently. He finds that this process has become almost too handy, and that it is corrupting us from becoming better educated.
In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, he states that our minds are changing because of the time we spend online. He explains how not only does the media just supply the information to the users, it also morphs the thoughts that flow in people’s minds. Previous habits such as reading are slowly being affected, but only few have noticed the change. For instance, when surfing the web people skim the articles they’re reading and merely go from link to link. Carr talks about how easy it is to research and find things on the internet within minutes maybe even seconds.
He attempts to show us in his essay how our minds have changed due to the use of the Internet. Summary Nicholas Carr examines in an essay how digital technology affects our intelligence. Nicholas was educated at Dartmouth and Harvard and is a member of Encyclopedia Britannica’s editorial board of advisors. He has written a book name “The Big Switch: Rewiring the World from
Some of the effects that Carr claims the internet cause do not entirely sound negative. For example, he states that “Taylor’s ethic is beginning to govern the realm of the mid as well.” Carr is saying that the use of the internet is causing its users brain to follow the ideas of Frederick Winslow Taylor, the idea of “seeking maximum speed, maximum efficiency, and maximum output”. He is attempting to argue that our constant search for instant answers was created by our experience with search engine like good and that it prevents its users from trying to think for themselves. Carr’s argument is a very debatable one, one could question why we should be putting effort into already acquired knowledge when we can devote it towards undiscovered knowledge.
Carr examines several key points in his articles that help assert his thesis. First, that he and his other literature based colleagues are having issues with concentrating on long stretches of text, and he finds himself drifting away, and having difficulty with returning to the same long stretch of the text he was just reading. Carr argues that “I feel as
My mind isn’t going---so far as I can tell---but it’s changing. I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy.” (Carr
Carr explains the internet has start to negatively impact our way of thinking, it brings distraction and lead us lost our concentration and also let us become impatient when reading a longer piece of article. Carr uses examples from history, his personal experience, and
Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” was published when the internet was still taking hold in a person’s everyday life. Throughout this article, he talks about how the internet is making our brains lazy because we do not have to go in depth to find what we are looking for. Ever since he started to use the internet, Carr thinks that the of the internet has made it so that he can no longer focus on a long article or research a topic. In this article Carr uses many examples of logos, ethos, and pathos to effectively convey his argument in a way that will convince the reader to believe his arguments.
Every day the world is being introduced to new technology to make life easier for people. In the article, “Is google making us stupid”, author Nicholas Carr tells us about how he believes that the internet is making us stupid by changing the way our brain processes information. Carr begins to tell us how the web is causing these issues such as how he can no longer be occupied in a book for a long period of time. He then starts to talk about how his whole life is surrounded by the internet and that is to blame for the problem he has with being able to stay focused while reading; but he also talks about how at the same time the internet benefited him so much because he is a writer. When reading this article, you can see that Carr uses a lot of
Thompson states how it is possible to maintain mindfulness as long as there is no laziness while reading. This means that taking the time to read all articles thoroughly will be beneficial in the long run, for skimming articles leads to an unsavory habit of getting complacent while reading. Su and Thompson both display their fear when it comes to how the Internet is affecting our social behaviors. They discuss how it is leading to people becoming less sociable and more likely to dodge social events. Carr argues for his concerns involving the Internet, including how it is affecting his ability to pay attention to long pieces of literature and how other scholars alike are having similar complications.
Is technology really changing the way our brains function? In “The Shallows” Nicholas Carr, argues technology is affecting the human brain by causing individuals to react abnormally. Having done some research, Carr realizes his lack of concentration due to technology was not unique but quite common. Fellow bloggers who are well known for their work have agreed that the internet has made them less a patient reader. The web encourages users to click and flick through ads that sidetrack people from realizing that their longer reading the articles they started to read.
Carr brings up many significant points that support his argument throughout the article such as the examples of himself, Bruce Friedman, and the study of the University College London to show that the way we think had been forever changed by the internet because we no longer have the ability to focus or concentrate. The author makes a strong point when he states a point from theorist Marshall McLuhan “media are not just passive channels of information. They supply the stuff of thought, but they also shape the process of thought” (227). Carr continues his thought with the self observation that “And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation. My mind now expects to take information the way