The internet, in short, is our everyday savior when in distress. Technology is a need in the 21st century. It is our main source of communication, socializing, learning and many others. However, according to Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, published in the July/August 2008 issue of the Atlantic, the internet is reprogramming his memory, and remapping his neural circuitry. Despite using logos intensely and multiple rhetorical approaches in convincing the reader of his point of view, Carr fails to make a logical, persuading argument for multiple reasons. To begin with, Carr starts his article by attracting the audience attention in the introduction, by citing a piece from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, in which HAL says …show more content…
He uses the phrase “I think I know what’s going on” (Carr 314) which proves his uncertainty of the reason. He also contradicts himself by stating that research now is much easier than it used to be before the internet, which brings the audience to question themselves and Carr about his point of view. And to be more self-contradicting, Carr states that the internet is a “Godsend” (Carr 314) to him as a writer, making his argument out of shape. Carr is also known to write multiple repetitive articles and about the issues caused by the usage of technology, but from what humans are experiencing so far, technology did nothing but improvements to the human culture, facilitating research, and helping to bring scientific discoveries to the surface. Later, Carr mentions Scott Karp and Bruce Friedman, Friedrich Nietzsche, who underwent the same problem as his, which seems to be an approach using ethos to gain credibility. However, he denies that by writing “Anecdotes don’t prove much.” (Carr 316). Then, switching for ethos to logos, he cites a study from University College London, explaining how internet users have the tendency to skim over articles, and to save web pages, but never return to them, but Carr doesn’t explain how it relates to his loss of focus or how it is making us “stupid”, which takes away the credibility he is trying to …show more content…
Previously, when there was no internet, people’s memory could recall full pieces of the information, but now, they might not recall the information as efficiently, however they can remember where they found the information and go back to it when in need. In fact, certain parts of the memory are improving. Like what Carr mentioned, the internet affects our cognition; a study states that not using Google makes you stupid, too. “Experienced Internet users actually showed increased brain activity, with more advanced decision-making skills and complex reasoning. In simple terms, the inexperienced Internet users lagged behind.” (Estes
He talks about the study report that people go online to avoid reading in the traditional sense. For example, one of the study reports, “It is clear … traditional sense (349) proves people, who use the internet, never return to any source they’ve visited. They just take the information and quickly jump to another source. He tries to give his audiences, mostly everyone who uses the internet about his argument by providing what we are losing over time in the process of using internet as our main information source. One more thing, Carr says that Google has made everything easier for people to take in
It is almost like the web reprograms our minds to think differently. Carr proves that other people have noticed this problem by saying “When I mention my troubles with reading to friends and acquaintances – Literary types, most of them – many say they’re having similar experiences (Carr 733). This all comes back and proves carr’s theory is
The article was chosen specifically by The Atlantic, at that time, because many assumptions and experiments were being made in that year, and the prior year, about what the internet is doing to our brains and the magazine wanted to be one of the first to publish such a work that they believed could be accurate and persuasive. In an attempt to sway the reader that the internet is affecting cognition, Nicholas Carr does not always meet the criteria
Additionally, Carr includes metaphors which incite pathos. He comments that our minds are being subject to pressure to “operate as high-speed data-processing machines” (Carr 12). This is an unhealthy expectation, and it leads most individuals to turn to websites such as Google in order to supplement (or even replace) their own brainpower. Comparing the expectations of our minds to be akin to some sort of supercomputer incites concern in the reader… they may realize for the first time the truth in this statement. Overall, Carr used far more rhetorical devices within his essay than I have been able to elaborate on (including, but not limited to, precise diction, a somewhat casual tone in order to help readers relate, and appositives to build his
Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” was published when the internet was still taking hold in a person’s everyday life. Throughout this article, he talks about how the internet is making our brains lazy because we do not have to go in depth to find what we are looking for. Ever since he started to use the internet, Carr thinks that the of the internet has made it so that he can no longer focus on a long article or research a topic. In this article Carr uses many examples of logos, ethos, and pathos to effectively convey his argument in a way that will convince the reader to believe his arguments.
Some of these sources include, “I think I know what’s going on. For more than a decade now, I’ve been spending a lot of time online, searching and surfing and sometimes adding to the great databases of the Internet.” (Car. 736). He then continued in saying “Research that used to require days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes.” Citing these sources encourages Carr’s credibility by showing that he has done his work and supplied beliefs and aspirations, as well as an expert opinion to maintain hiser claim.
In, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?," Nicholas Carr contends that the web is changing the way individuals read and process data. Despite the fact that the web offers information productivity, it smoothes the brains learning knowledge simultaneously. The main thing he does is clarify how his psyche has turned out to be considerably more unpredictable subsequent to utilizing the web. “I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do.” Carr not just uses numerous accounts to help his perception, he likewise utilizes logical investigations from the University College London.
How does the Internet affect your attention span? Nicholas Carr argues that the Web is detrimental to your ability to focus on literature. He focuses on his personal experiences and what other scholars say about this phenomenon. I believe that having the Web at your disposal makes it easier to focus, considering you can clear up anything you come to be stuck on while reading. With the Internet comes the ability to read something that may be out of a person’s education level since they can search any terminology that is more in depth.
He tries the explain the natural development of technology and how it is leading us to artificial intelligence, but in doing this he does not add into in his argument. The objective of companies like Google attempting to supplement our intelligence with artificial intelligence does not have any measurable outcome in the real world. The counterargument is trying to take something that he believes may happen in the future vs. something that he has explained to be experienced over time. While it is possible that he is trying to warn about the future to this problem, this argument does not supplement his argument that we are losing our attention span when it comes to long readings online. Carr is only deviated from what he is trying to convince the reader, and this only adds to the tangled mess that his arguments are in
Carr declares his realization that he has been spending a lot of time online, and acknowledges the value it had to him as a writer to quickly obtain the facts or quotes he was seeking, and the advantages
Carr expresses that his mind and how he thinks changed due to the new phenomenon “the Internet.” He proves his point by explaining that the internet has reprogrammed our minds to want everything quick and complete. To me, this was effective because once the reader thinks about it, they start realizing how accurate this actually is. By successfully, including pathos he interacts with the any type of audience and has them mentally
Nicholas Carr wrote this essay to let the upcoming generations know about the danger effect of the Internet overuse by using ethos, logos, and pathos and also some other rhetorical strategies. He starts his essay with a scene that was takin by Stanley Kubrick’s A in 2001: A Space Odyssey at the end of the paragraph saying, “I can feel it.’’ And after that he started his next paragraph with the same words, “I can feel it.’’
Carr describes himself over the past few years as being inadequate of reading a full book. He formulates a theory saying that the Internet is a “universal medium”, where people have instant access to almost any topic imaginable. Because of the accessibility of the Internet,
In the essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by Nicholas Carr, he mentioned that the technology is decreasing our abilities and increasing our dependence on sources such as internet. Carr describes how the internet is affecting the human brain and changing our minds. He explained that the internet is affecting the way that people receive and store information. Carr’s main idea is that extensive computer use is changing the human mind, mostly in negative ways because spending too much time on the internet can cause people to become lazy. He thought that the internet is turning us into scattered and superficial thinkers.
He includes quotes from large, technology tycoons who believe that advancement in technology is beneficial because it is making information more accessible and more useful. Carr counters this claim by stating that with the large advancements that technology “Is doing the work of the mind” (324). While he addresses naysayers in his argument he does not completely dismiss their ideas, instead discussing them in a calm way that builds his credibility with the reader. Though Carr believes the most important thing that technology is doing is getting close to replacing human thinking, he discusses the ideas that people believe could be a positive. His rational discussion of the opposition makes him appear knowledgeable to the reader which further builds his argument.