Summary Of Jackson's Nullification Proclamation

421 Words2 Pages

Alan Martinez November 11, 2017 History 1301 President Jackson's Nullification Proclamation (1832). Pdf. In this proclamation, Jackson opposes the constitution and responds by saying that whoever does not listen will be punished. Also, he said if anyone tries to bring in goods then will close the ports. He said that regardless with the constitution put in place he was not going to let the states follow its laws. Jackson says that the laws were not current and that and that people from the union lost the real laws. He said that the people declared the us to be a nation and not a individually state governed nation. This argument is important because it helps me and others understand that the meaning of liberty during the time frame meant to …show more content…

The president is allowed to take away any land claimed by the indian tribes including any lands that were improved or refurbished by the indian tribes. However there is a section that states the protection of the tribes as they are forced into estranged territories. This document was useful for me in understanding briefly how the U.S, through law, pushed the indian tribes to migrate to other locations in order to continue manifest destiny. “Transcript of Gibbons v. Ogden (1824).” Our Documents - Transcript of Gibbons v. Ogden (1824). Accessed November 10, 2017. https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc This impactful court case was based on two men who thought their licenses outweighed one another. It is clear based on this transcript of the Gibbons and Ogden case that congress was given the power to control regulation of interstate waterway commerce. Every state in the nation was connected by waterways and marshall made his point that without the power of congress, commerce cannot be carried out through the states. If states were allowed that control , then they would have their own rules about commerce, therefore, commerce would have been impossible and producers and consumers would not be able to sell or buy products under uniform law. Hence, it is why the articles of confederation were put to an end in order to prevent states from eventually holding the power to control interstate

Open Document