Freedom Writer An Analysis of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s Moving Letter On April 12, 1963, a group of clergymen from Alabama released the “PUBLIC STATEMENT BY EIGHT ALABAMA CLERGYMEN” in which they criticized the actions of the Civil Rights Movement, asking for the oppressed African American community to wait with patience for their justice to arrive. In response to this publication, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a lengthy letter while incarcerated known as “LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM JAIL”, on April 16, 1963. Dr. King uses this letter to respond to the clergymen, and convey his side of the situation, as well as to justify the actions of those involved with the movement. Dr. King’s letter means to sway the views of the clergymen by explicitly …show more content…
King adds some context as to why he is in Birmingham. He states that he “was invited” to Birmingham due to the many organizations that he is involved with, but first and foremost “because injustice is [in Birmingham]”. This immediately sets up and validates not only his purpose in being there, but also to the movement itself. Dr. King then includes an allusion in which he compares himself, and those involved in the movement, to the Apostle Paul, and others who spread “the gospel of Jesus Christ to the far corners of the Greco-Roman world”. By including this allusion, Dr. King strengthens his ethos and appeals to the religious background of the clergymen at the same time. He also notes a common belief that he shares with the clergymen, setting them equal to each …show more content…
King notices many flaws and inconsistencies within the clergymen’s article and attempts to set things straight. He points out their contradicting views on how the movement is treating the public compared to how the public is treating the movement, stressing their goal of “peaceful protests” versus the police brutality and social humiliation received in response. King also lists examples of the promises that have been broken by the public and the government, which furthers his ethos. One of which being the promise of storeowners “to remove [their] stores humiliating racial signs”, which were disrespectfully put back up soon after being taken down. King goes on to explain how they have started “a series of workshops on nonviolence”, along with peaceful protests and sit-ins, which exemplifies their continued dedication to keep the movement free of tumult on their side. King justifies these actions with an allusion to Socrates, explaining that they are necessary “to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism”. By assuming that the men will know and understand this allusion, he is in a sense complimenting them while further establishing his own
King directly responds to the points brought up by the clergymen in their letter and always backs up his argument with evidence. He objectively uses rhetorical questions to provoke the clergymen to consider his own ideas on the points raised in their letter. He aims to put turn a negative situation, into a positive one by hoping that positive social change can come out of a negative situation such as
Others might say all leaders are rebels because they perform illegal actions to get what they want. For example, King, Martin Luther Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail, states, “But I am sure that if I had lived in Germany during this time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal.” This means Mr.King would’ve helped unexplored Jews in Hitler 's Germany even if it meant going against the law. This shows Mr.King, a leader representing rebellion as he states he wouldn 't have a problem braking authority. Nevertheless not all leaders are rebels.
Martin Luther King Jr.’s letter from Birmingham Jail was written so respectfully while still addressing many valuable points of disagreement in response to a public statement made by white religious leaders regarding a non-violent demonstration he was involved in and arrested for. I found it kind of humorous that as I was reading A Letter from a Birmingham Jail (1963), I thought, this is more like a book than a letter, and then Martin Luther King, Jr. writes “never before have I written a letter this long – or should I say book,” (p.6). I believe that what MLK is arguing throughout his letter is for understanding.
They make a claim of value, stating that they support equal rights and a peaceful resolution. The clergymen just want to avoid any act of violence that will disrupt that peace. Laws are already in place that will address their concern, and they believe that equal rights should be decided by the courts and not the people. Thus making a claim of policy. This letter was intended to make a claim of fact to the readers that King was an outside agitator disturbing their progression, and was only going to make matters worse.
1963 could be considered the peak of the civil rights movement- with protests in Birmingham, the March on Washington, and the surfacing of Martin Luther King Jr.'s ground-breaking pieces "I Have A Dream" and "Letter from Birmingham Jail," the demand for civil rights had become a genuine American crisis. Dr. King wrote "Letter from Birmingham Jail" while he was in custody with the intention to share with fellow Americans his grievances and explain the absolute necessity for protests in Birmingham. Almost a century prior, in 1852, Frederick Douglass delivered his biting and passionate speech "The Meaning of July Fourth for the Negro" on behalf of all the enslaved. Somewhat similar to Dr. King's letter, Douglass shares his own grievances regarding
Dr. King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”: Just and Unjust Laws Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is a letter to eight white clergymen while he’s sitting in a jail cell, the result of a protest in Birmingham, Alabama that King, a Georgian, traveled to attend. Due to the criticisms of the clergymen, he commences his letter by explaining why he needed to come to Birmingham. King states that he was there for a multitude of reasons, the first being that he had organizational ties to Birmingham, the second being that he was there because there was injustice in Birmingham. He states that as a citizen of America, injustice in Birmingham is not removed from justice anywhere else because everything is interrelated, and that injustice
Dr. King's, "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" is poignant in many ways in regard to a "big picture" viewpoint of our society. Overall, it speaks to the viewpoint that we all have a social responsibility to each other to work against injustice irrespective of where that injustice takes place. "Martin Luther King Jr.'s letter from Birmingham Jail, which was written in April 16, 1963, is a passionate letter that addresses and responds to the issue and criticism that a group of white clergymen had thrown at him and his pro- black American organization about his and his organization's non- violent demonstrative actions against racial prejudice and injustice among black Americans in Birmingham. Dr. King told the local clergy in Birmingham that he understood he was an outsider and he realized that his presence in Birmingham would cause trouble. However, he also felt that he had a moral
In paragraphs 33 to 44 of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s response to “A Call for Unity,” a declaration by eight clergymen, “Letter from Birmingham Jail” (1963), he expresses that despite his love for the church, he is disappointed with its lack of action regarding the Civil Rights Movement. Through powerful, emotionally-loaded diction, syntax, and figurative language, King adopts a disheartened tone later shifts into a determined tone in order to express and reflect on his disappointment with the church’s inaction and his goals for the future. King begins this section by bluntly stating that he is “greatly disappointed” (33) with the church, though he “will remain true to it as long as the cord of life shall lengthen” (33). By appealing to ethos and informing the audience of his history with the church, he indicates that he is not criticizing the church for his own sake, but for the good of the church.
In this quote, Martin Luther stated that his critics disagreed with his decision to hold demonstrations in Birmingham but managed to weaken these claims by exposing the hypocrisy within them. He does this numerous times within the letter, using a persuasive structure to dismantle the opposition’s arguments. Throughout the “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King also used metaphors and comparisons to bring attention to
Martin Luther King, Jr. attempts to persuade clergymen to follow in his civil rights movement through exhibiting his knowledge over just and unjust laws, displaying peaceful behavior, and empathetic diction. King was very knowledgeable about laws and his right as a human. King stated laws in his letter to the clergymen, which displayed his credibility. He did not only state laws, he also stated just and unjust laws. King stated, “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?”
Although that was enough reason to be in Birmingham King goes on further to say that he is in Birmingham because injustice is here. King says he couldn’t ignore the fact there was injustice in Birmingham regardless if he was an outsider or not. King goes on to say that “injustice anywhere is a danger to justice everywhere” this builds on the theory that “whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly. Defending his belief on just and unjust laws, King uses a quote of St. Augustine the quote says, “A unjust law is no law at all.” King uses this to answer the criticism on how can you advocate people to obey one law but breaking others.
Civil rights leader, Martin Luther King Jr, in his Letter from Birmingham City Jail, argues against criticism from eight Alabama clergymen, and addresses their concerns. He defends his position, and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), against accusations of disturbing the peace in Birmingham, as well as explaining his values and opinions. Throughout the letter, King adopts a strong logical and credible tone, and reinforces his position through the use of strong emotional justifications, in order to appeal to the clergymen and defend his public image. Martin Luther King opens up his Letter from Birmingham City Jail by appealing to the clergymen's emotions, and assuring his peaceful response, which he describes in "patient and
When responding to the eight white clergymen, he states, “Seldom do I pause to answer criticism of my work and ideas,” giving the reader the notion that a plethora of criticism must come across his desk. But, he has chosen to write a response and explain himself simply because King feels they are “men of genuine good will” and their criticism is “sincerely set forth.” After the introduction of his letter, he feels he must next explain his location at the time: Birmingham Jail. “I am in Birmingham because injustice is here,” says King. This quote lets the reader know there is a reason behind King’s arrest, a very good reason, too.
He as well emphasizes the importance of the demonstration in moral and historical grounds. In this letter, King explains the importance and the planning of the Birmingham demonstration. King illustrates this when he faces the criticism of his demonstrations as “unwise and untimely” (King 1). He shares key features to his anti-violence movement: “determining whether injustices exist, negotiation, self-purification, and direct action” (King 1).
King believed that if he could just go to Birmingham, and protest non-violently, that he could make a difference. On April 16, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. was imprisoned, in Birmingham, for protesting the civil rights of Black Americans. While in jail, he began writing a letter addressing the clergymen. His main audience in writing this letter was to the eight clergymen who criticized his actions and also the majority of the population as well. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter From Birmingham Jail”, argues that injustice